JTuffnell
-
Posts
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by JTuffnell
-
-
Ok... I watched the video and others by the OP. Let's just say that I'm going to be nice and withhold my comments.
??????????
0 -
Here is that link you missed:
http://primes.utm.edu/largest.html
http://primes.utm.ed.../page.php?id=14
Ooo.... this one is huge:
http://www.math.utah...largeprime.html
I can keep this up all day. If you are interested in large numbers than visit this site:
They love to prove that these large numbers are primes.
Why do you keep going on about primes? IM NOT TALKING ABOUT PRIMES!
Just the biggest number ever
If your just trying to get me to show you my calculations, so you can claim that you worked it out, then FORGET IT! Im not that stupid....try harder
-1 -
Well, if the numbers I have listed are bigger than your number, then clearly your number is NOT the biggest number of all time. Oh... prime numbers are probably more proper than yours.
but you have no proof?
-2 -
Not a proper number? You just made 7,212,610,147,295,474,909,544,523,785,043,492,409,969,382,148,186,765,460,082,500,085,393,519,556,525,921,455,588,705,423,020,751,421 cry :'( The answer to what? The meaning of life?
The answer to "what is the biggest number of all time"??? I thought this was clear?
-1 -
This prime number is bigger and has 100 digits:
7,212,610,147,295,474,909,544,523,785,043,492,409,969,382,148,186,765,460,082,500,085,393,519,556,525,921,455,588,705,423,020,751,421
This prime number is even bigger yet with 200 digits:
40,992,408,416,096,028,179,761,232,532,587,525,402,909,285,099,086,220,133,403,920,525,409,552,083,528,606,215,439,915,948,260,875,718,893,
797,824,735,118,621,138,192,569,490,840,098,061,133,066,650,255,608,065,609,253,901,288,801,302,035,441,884,878,187,944,219,033
This prime number is bigger than your number and it's a palindrome:
742,950,290,870,000,078,092,059,247
But all these numbers you've provided are not proper numbers. Plus I did all the calculations and none of these numbers were the answer
-1 -
That's just the count of the digits making up the number and not the number itself. Your number only has 22 digits.
Lets agree to disagree, Science is about sharing ideas
0 -
Have you ever heard of the Ackermann function? The numbers produced by this function can easily become larger than your 22 digit number. Also, a googolplex [math]10^{10^{100}}[/math] is by far larger than your number and only uses a one and a whole bunch of zeroes. We even know about prime numbers larger than your number:
http://primes.utm.edu/largest.html
The largest known prime from 2008 is [math]2^{43112609}-1[/math] and has 12978189 digits.
"12978189 digits"
12978189 is a smaller number then 7,987,987,778,981,078,910,148
Why would they copy your theory? What benefit does knowing this number bring?
The highest number for what? Anything? We actually have more atoms in our body than that.
Isn't 7,987,987,778,981,078,910,149 a little higher than 7,987,987,778,981,078,910,148?
Wouldn't your theory be falsified if there was even one number higher than yours?
You mentioned that your number had no numbers 1-6, yet there are 1s and a 4, which you read as "ten" and "fourteen". What's the significance of that?
ten and fourteen are clearly higher then numbers 1-6?
-1 -
what about the avagadro constant?
biggest number? aye right.
I don't know what the avocado constant is, sorry.
can you scientifically demonstrate a bigger number? I don't think so
I don't know what the avocado constant is, sorry.
can you scientifically demonstrate a bigger number? I don't think so
I meant the avagrado. autocorrect in action ther!
1 -
Well I have actually used considerably larger numbers than that. Although I did try phoning it and only got the BT ansaphone service.
Larger number then 7,987,987,778,981,078,910,148?
NO CHANCE
That's pretty big. At a glance, it certainly looks bigger than anything I've come across as a professional mathematician, but without knowing how you arrived at the number I can't be certain that it's the biggest. You'll probably have to publish your methods. If you're correct, it could be a pretty important finding.
Thanks, I think it could be pretty big aswell. When I was working out the findings, I could feel some sort of energy around me.
I knew it was gonna be a more significant project then usual.
0 -
why not your number plus 1?
I don't really want to go into my workings out, incase somebody copies my theory, sorry.
But this is the highest number
0 -
I think I may have found the biggest number available.
Here are my workings out. Please let me know how to submet this to a journal
0
My contribution to Science
in Speculations
Posted
Never seen this video before, was funny though..Why do you ask?