mrs.warren

quote:-

Confinement,which means that the force between quarks does not diminish as they are separated.Because of this,it would take an infinite amount of energy to separate two quarks;they are forever bound into hadrons such as the proton and the neutron.

Yet an up quark and an anti-up quark,annihilate producing a gluon which then produces a top quark and an anti-top quark.

 

MY question is if it takes an infinite amount of energy to separate 2 quarks,where do you get 2 free quarks to annihilate and produce top quarks that are separated,does it take an infinite amount of energy to separate top quarks?

An infinite amount of energy would imply that separating 2 quarks would require the annihilation of the rest of the universe,leaving you with just 2 quarks.

Try looking into Quantum Chromodynamics.... it's very enlightening information for this subject.

Right. so this is where the twin paradox theory comes into play. Observer A is moving at said speed © and observer B is stationary. each see's their own perspective on each others "movement".

Also, with the "warping of time" Who would age the fastest... more weird things!

"strings"in the string theory is nothing more than energy compressed into this infinitely thing "string" like manifestation.

Instead of looking into the string theory, try researching into the field of the "M" theory. It is backed by mathematical equations, that the sting theory still has left to be defined.

Also the "M" theory spans many more multiple dimensions.

(Theoretically)

If you were to be traveling in you vehicle at the speed of light, and you turned on your headlights. would you see the OUTWARD projection of the photons? Or would the beams itself bend around the front bumper and shine out in a negative velocity?