levin irmak

short description of quantum optics taken from wikipedia. Quantum optics is a field of research in physics, dealing with the application of quantum mechanics to phenomena involving light and its interactions with matter.

can some one tell me how does measuring a single polarized photon affect its behavior afterwards ex; when it goes through another polaroid. ? isn't there any way to measure it without disturbing it? Can we develop a theory that reasons for the disturbance of the subatomic particles and a way to determine a non-disturbing measurement of the subatomic particles?

sincerely yours,

Seeing as I have no background in prime numbers I'm sure I'll come across as an idiot, but that's okay with me as long as I learn something new.

 

Anyway, I don't understand this search for the highest prime number. If a prime number is divisible by only itself and the number 1, then doesn't the following example describe the highest prime number?

 

If you started writing the number nine at the very beginning of time, and then at the very end of time you placed a 7 on the end of those nines, wouldn't that be the largest prime number?

 

999-infinity-7

the greatest prime number has nothing to do with what you said. lets say the number 999......7 is a prime number as you said however if you multiply all the prime numbers until 999....7 and add 1 you would still get a prime and bigger than yours and you can infinitely do that operation.

Once you divide by (x+c) you will get q(x), not p(x).

p(x)= q(x). x+c/x+c

it is still p(x) but written by its factors

You can divide by the abstract polynomial x+c in the polynomial ring over the real numbers, and you are not dividing by the zero polynomial, so the operation is perfectly correct. Later you can evaluate the resulting function at x=-c if you like, and if you do it properly you will be dividing by zero.

this made it clear, still it turn out to be the same question , is 1/(1/0) =o or undefined ???

p(x)=a₁x¹+a₂x²+......a_nxⁿ is a polynomial

if the polynomial is divisible by x+c where c is real number we get;

p(x)= q(x).(x+c)

x+c=0

x=-c if plug that in to the division we get;

q(x).(x+c)/(x+c)

p(x)= 0/0

although this is a clear contradiction, why is it still possible to use it in mathematical calculations and give us right answer???

sincerely yours;

It works pretty often, but not always. You still have to check that the output is prime.

=Uncool-

Mersenne numbers are not actually to generate prime numbers, but using the generated prime numbers to obtain perfect numbers from this formula

2^p−1(2^p−1) where p is a mersenne prime number.

ex: when p=2 > 2^1*(2^2-1)= 6

6 is a perfect number because a perfect number is when the sum of its factors (except the number itself) is the number it self

6= 1*2*3 > 1+2+3=6

i believe this wouldn't harm the relativity as speculated because we actually don't know if the neutrinos travelled faster than the speed of light in our 4 dimensional space and time and i do believe that the tau neutrinos travelled through the extra dimensions predicted in the string theory or even a wormhole . therefore the only flaw of relativity would be that it only describes our 4 dimensional space if the extra dimensons and the neutrinos travelling through another dimension can be proved then the only thing we can do for relativity is to expand it to describe our 11 dimensional universe or whatever