Kimani

Where does it say a theory has to be scientifically researched? Where the does it say it has to be proven by this research in order for it to be a theory?

Its an idea I had while extensively studying metaphysics and modern psychology. It is a theory. This is a non-issue. You are hung up on something that is irelevant.

Ive been promoting this thing all over. Ive been to many different messageboards that have anything to do with this and yes you are the second person to bring up research. Nobody defines theory in the way you do.

No its still a theory. Im just using evidence and philosophies that are already in place. Most people dont even ask me about research. You are like the second person who has done so. Most people Ive shown this to just accept it as a theory regardless of whether they support it or not.

I'm just basing this on an existing philosophy or existing evidence. I dont have a research group. I dont understand the need to do further research when these types / disorders have already been thoroughly explored.

Well If you are familiar with these disorders you would know that some of them have similar characteristics. Since they have common elements they can be classified or grouped together.

I think there is evidence that the archetypes that Carl Jung recognized in people can be alligned with these conditions so that they are equivalent to each other. Again being familiar with the archetypes as he describes them helps and being familiar with the disorders also helps.

Environment is everything in this theory. Environment is what causes these types to surface. I dont believe that intelligence or personality is genetic.

That being said I think that aspect is something to ponder but I don't really see it as being relevant to diagnosing people or having people diagnose themselves as one of these types. It's interesting to think about but is it beneficial?

Well I'm using division to come up with personality types. Im dividing archetypes until they take on new meaning and manifest themselves as something else.

These types are like windows into how/what people really are. I think they are people in their true forms. Gnostics believe that there is more to us than what we can see. There are other forces and thats what this seems like. Another force.

I never really understood the difference between Gnosticism and metaphysics. They both seem to cover the same territory. I mean they both try to explain the true nature of people.

Well I think it shows that math can actually be applied to psychology. I think it also legitimizes beliefs such as Gnosticism.

I thought that the three types allow people to view themselves in a different way than they may have viewed themselves before. it puts their conditions / disorders in a more positive light. You design. You charm. You are professional. I don't see what is so pointless about it.

I agree that you dont need the archetypes to reach these conclusions about people but I find it interesting to do that way.

All feedback is welcome and appreciated

Math and synergy can be used to understand human behavior. Metaphysics and modern psychology are explored using a formula. This formula transcends those beliefs. It reorganizes Carl Jung's concept of archetypes. It involves synergy in that it combines types until they assume a new meaning and can be viewed and classified under a larger umbrella.

Archetypes are primal symbols of people. They are basic instincts and tendencies. Archetypes represent the hopes, desires, and needs that people universally exhibit and express without being aware of it. They are our primitive selves. They make up the unconscious mind.

These archetypes are building blocks in determining personalities. Their fusion allows you to view personality types from a different perspective.

Many individual archetypes are found in people at the same time / over a lifetime. These archetypes seperately show fragments of people's unconscious minds. These archetypes combined display a large part or portion of the unconsciou mind. When organized into groups of two they spell out psychological conditions. What seems random at first becomes very familiar when placed in a different context. Archetypes are primal and one-dimensionl. Civilized man is two-dimensionl.

There are six archetypes in this equation. They include The Child, The Hero, The Mother, The Shadow, The Trickster, and The Wise Old Man. Each archetype represents a distinctive trait. The Child lacks restrain. The Hero is vulnerable. The Mother is empathetic and comforting. The Shadow is a symbol of apathy. The Wise Old Man is insightful.

The six archetypes are divided into three sets. There are two archetypes in each set. The combination of the two archetypes in each set results in a model for psychological conditions. The Hero and The Wise Old Man combine to form the bipolar spectrum and Asperger's syndrome. The Mother and The Child combine to form avoidant, co-dependency, and dependency. The Shadow and The Trickster combine to form borderline, histrionic, narcissism, and sociopathy.

There are twelve psychological condtions / types used in this concept. They are Asperger's syndrome, bipolar 1, bipolar 2, cyclothymia, Asperger's syndrome, avoidant, co-depedency, borderline, histrionic, narcissism, and sociopathy.

During periods of mania people experience bursts of creativity. Bipolar results in extended periods of mania so therefore a fluctuation of creativity but also intense vulnerability when the mania is over. The obsessive nature of people with Asperger's syndrome also results in a fluctuation of creativity and an inability to understand and be aware of people's feelings and perceptions.

Avoidants, co-dependents, and dependents tend to look to others for constant validation. They are very accommodating in their nature. There are large amounts of professional behavior in all three.

Borderlines, histrionics, narcissists and sociopaths all have a disposition that leans towards a self-absorbed personality. They draw people into relationships that are based on deceit and self-gratification. This results in large quantities of charming behavior in all four types.

The similar elements of these conditions unify them. They form an entity. These entities are used to define an individual. This is a method of identifying individuality. A person will gravitate towards one of three entities much more than any of the others. Three characters are used to symbolize humanity. Society is divided into three essential segments.

Artistrty, Professionalism, Opportunism

The Designer, The Professional, The Charmer

Experiences during childhood are catalysts. They mold and shape people. Habits developed as a youth act as infections. They stunt growth and progression in certain individual areas while leaving remaining areas alone. The end result of this process is this triad of entities.

A lifestyle or career isn't defined by this system. This is a state of mind. These are identities and alter-egos. They form an existence.

The mind is like a machine in this way. The brain is layered and textured with concepts until they take on form, shape, and color. The unconscious mind has built a program.

The Designer

Archetypes: The Hero - vulnerable, troubled

The Wise Old Man - mentor / guide

Tendencies: withdrawn, analytical, creative

Talents: composing, equating, calculating

Conditions: Asperger's syndrome, bipolar spectrum

The Professional

Archetypes: The Child - unconditional love, submission

The Mother - nurturing, devoted

Tendencies: generosity, dedication, humility, sacrifice

Talents: consoling, comforting, compromising, estimating

Conditions: avoidant, co-dependecy, dependency

The Charmer

Archetypes: The Shadow - back stabbing

The Trickster - devious, sneaky

Tendencies: impulsive, manipulative, egocentric

Talents: seducing, tempting, exploiting

Conditions: borderline, histrionic, narcissism, sociopathy