TurboRotary
-
Posts
15 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by TurboRotary
-
-
Which interpretation do you subscribe to?
0 -
Well if you want to get into it, then may I ask: Where did you leave off with mathematics? I am sure I have some free online resources that can get you up to speed.
Im gonna make a guess here that I left off WAY to soon right!? lol
0 -
yeah.. He said that they are particles traveling backward but that we see them as moving foward.
0 -
Cant photons and electrons already go back and foward in time when they bounce off of each other? Thats what I read anyway. They can for a very very brief amount of time. Also photons do travel both faster and slower than the speed of light according to Feynman.
0 -
So basicially what hes saying is that the HUP really just helps people used to thinking in classical terms grasp QM right? And again... I do not know any mathematics so all of that is gibberish to me!
0 -
Im sorry but I dont know what that means.. Im very new to this and dont know what on-shell or off-shell is.. nor do I understand the mathematics. Maybe I also need a more thorough understanding of HUP.. When I read that it just sort of struck me as odd because from what Ive read HUP is one of the bases of QM.
0 -
It comes from the his book QED.. "If you get rid of all the old-fashioned ideas and instead use the ideas that Im explaining in these lectures then there is no need for an uncertainty principle."
0 -
He said that if you think in terms of classical physics then you need the uncertainty principle.. but if you think with a soley quantum mindset you then the uncertainty principle isnt needed.. what did he mean by this? why would it not be needed?
0 -
Well if you want to get into it, then may I ask: Where did you leave off with mathematics? I am sure I have some free online resources that can get you up to speed.
BTW.. Im interested in what sources you have.
0 -
Go for it. I'm 16, well nearly 17, and in college (UK equivalent of Highschool) and I taught myself quantum mechanics/field theory and all the prerequisite stuff. Reading popular science is definitely the thing to do first. If you need any help any time just give me a shout.
Yeah Im gonna try to do the same thing. Thanks man.
0 -
Well if you want to get into it, then may I ask: Where did you leave off with mathematics? I am sure I have some free online resources that can get you up to speed.
I left of with Geometry.. haha. I have some learning to do! Ill take all the help I can get.. thanks!
0 -
I know nothing of the mathematics involved with QM.. Im trying to break into that slowly. Right now Im just trying to get the basic gist of it all. I have read In Search of Schrodingers Cat and a few web sites about QM and I just picked up Feynmans QED book.. so Im hoping that will give a decent picture.
0 -
Ok.. first off Im no physicist.. hell Im not even in school. I have a deep interest in Quantum Mechanics.. Ive been reading alot about it. I want to get a better grasp on both QED and QCD. What books would you guys/girls recommend?
0
Copenhagen or Everett?
in Quantum Theory
Posted
I have a big problem with the Many Worlds Intrepretation.. It seems that alot of authors of QM books are subscribing to this though.