573v3

Matter isnt a planet.. matter is a identical source of one thing organized in different facions to emmit different characteristics. I was refering to human time determined from the earths spins, and revolutions around the sun originating from which makes those things exist, the combination of "attoms" making the system operate, it all comes from 1 source u see. Every action comes from 1 thing, combined and organized in a cirtain way that then determines what happens from the relation ship between this interacting identicals.

 

If all matter, stopped, meaning all the atoms in the universe suddenly stopped functioning in any possible way imaginable. yes time would stop in the sense of a human watching time pass by. Because nothing would happen, without active atoms, no reactions occur (and i am not refering to absolute zero degrees tempeture) I mean putting a stop to everysingle atom. This would cause all light energy to cease to be in production, gravity would then cease to exist for it has to orginate from something that exists. So theoretically, sure if you paused atoms in time, atoms would pause time. Everything as you know today would quit interacting and darkness would be all.

So you'r saying time is fictive term, a word we came up with to define the activity of events rather then time as a construct; the construct of space-time; a 4dimensional universe; an existing degree of freedom in wich energy moves?

LHC, is that a reference to that thing they'r constucting down at cern?

As for the typo, you just couldn't leave the opportunity to comment on it right

Yes, I copy-paste a lot, whenever possible, It's a way of avoiding mistakes due to my dislexia.

So basicly you'r saying: if it would be theoreticly and practicly possible, then yes I believe it would. Not much opinion in that statement, now is there.

Do you personally think there exist a complete, background-independent, deterministic, and fully quantifyable (i.e. discrete) model of how spacetime behaves?

I do, but I don't think we'r very likely to find out

I think that is a lousy defenition of time when talking about relativity if that was what you meant then.

Think about this, if the earth would stop spinning, would time stop? Your defenition seems to implie that if you ask me.

If All matter would come to a stop, would time stop to? Would the fabric of time, the dimention suddenly sease to exist?

I guess it all depends on quantummechanics. Some people think that quantummechanics gives these statistic results because that is the best we can get while others believe our knowledge on it is simply to small to see why sometimes we have one outcome and sometimes another. In other words believe that chaos is an order we fail to understand.

theoreticly, ...

practicly would of course be a whole diffrent thing as bascule pointed out

That is based of my theory that light is particles.

Again, nothing new here, we call them photons.

I'm no expert, but as far as I can tell, all it does is display some images

the source:

<script>

 

var presses = 0;

 

function press() {

var i = document.images[1];

var j = document.images[0];

 

presses++;

 

i.src = "brb-in.png";

j.src = "brb-display-on.png";

 

window.setTimeout("unpress()", 200);

}

 

function unpress() {

var i = document.images[1];

 

i.src = "brb-out.png";

 

if (presses > 1) {

window.location = "http://totl.net/HonourSystem/?doit=2) ?>";

}

}

 

</script>

I dont thing its even a hole..It seems to me that it is a very dense pulsar type of object, a collapsed star that has enough gravity to slow down light enough that it can suck it back. So it has the appearence of a large black hole but I beleive it is a small collapsed star and only allows the light to travel so far away before it sucks it back.

we all know that it's just an old name that survived the newer theories

If you were able to get on that event horizen I think you would simply be peering inside the zone where light makes a U-turn back to the gravity source.. Im not sure what it would look like.. I guess it would be pretty damn bright since it would be like a white dwarf that has so much gravity light cant escape very far from it before turning around.

How would you "see" the light when it is drawn away from your eyes?

The frequency of the universe interpretted as how you choose to combine the frequencies to call it one unit.

I read this over and over and over agin, but I still can't figure it out.

I take it the second part: "interpretted as how you choose to combine the frequencies to call it one unit."

means: "however you feel like interpreting that and whatever you like to call it"

But the first part: "the frequency of the universe"

When I read frequency I automaticly think of vibration.

Are you trying to say time is defind by the frequency of the vibration through it's dimention? And if you are saying that, the vibration of what?

A particle? The entire universe?

damn, you beat me to it, and there i was wasting my time ttrying it with:

Sin (2a) = [2 tg (a) ] / [1 + tg^2 (a)]

Sin (2t) = {2 sin (t) / cos (t) } / {1 + [sin^2 (t) / cos^2 (t)]}

Sin (2t) = {4x^2 / cos (t) } / { 1 + [x^4 / cos^2 (t) ]}

Sin (2t) = {4x^2 / cos (t) } + {4x^2 / cos (t) }/ {x^4 / cos^2 (t)}

Sin (2t) = {4x^2 / cos (t) } + {4x^2 / cos (t) }{cos^2 (t) / x^4 }

Sin (2t) = {4x^2 / cos (t) } + {4 cos(t) / x^2 }

Sin (2t) = 4{ [x^4 + cos^2(t) ] / [x^2 cos (t) ]}

Didn't amount to much

Glad you found the answer though

It's been a long time since I dealth with this, but aren't you confusing:

cos (t) = 1 - sin (t)

with:

cos (t)^2 = 1 - sin (t)^2

This is a standard formula:

Sin (2a) = 2 sin (a) cos (a)

Lets use it for your problem (I replaced theta with t for easy typing, hope it isn’t to confusing with t-formulas)

Sin (2t) = 2 sin (t) cos (t) of which we can replace Sin (t) with x^2 so:

Sin (2t) = 2 x^2 cos (t)

somehow I sense there’s a mush more elegant solution then this, but technically, this would be a valid answer. And your signature does ask for simplicity

and the reason is because of how the brain works, it TRIES to make sense of things as soon as possible, and so it`ll take each letter at a time until it makes a word, then move on until it gets another word and so forth...

Hmmm, I think it will be more likely to be due to the fact that only 2 splits have to be made to see "god is nowhere" apposed to 3 splits to recognise "God is now here". See, it's just easyer.