Gasparri

I don't have a theory. I have a discovery.

Apparently your view of me is ad-hominid.

Grow up young man.

Please remove my account from this site as no provisions are provided so I can remove myself.

What's missing ? How come we haven't worked out how to do this yet ?

It's just a 'matter' of 'time'.

And then there's the Boaz Einstein Condensates...

Light can be slowed down and even brought to a stop.

Not much practical use there though and you'd have to

wear thermal underwear to get a close look.

Some theorize a BEC analogy for space. Should an analog

BEC 'ether' exist (The Higgs field?) with similar properties it

might be wise to put a sticker on telescopes... "Objects

viewed with this instrument may be much closer than they appear."

Gasparri:

 

The mobius band locally looks like 2-space, or a plane - and so is defined to be 2-dimensional.

Of course! It all resolves down to a reference frame. On a mobius strip

there is a single point that marks a 2D x,y aspect. This point is usually

located at the center of the band and may move around the band

to always a position opposite to the center of rotation of the twist.

I hope I phrased that right. More or less the mobius band resembles

the electron of a hydrogen atom. If you think of the twist of a mobius

band as a unit, and that the twist can follow around the band leaving

a virtual impression of movement where only rotation is involved, the

whole idea makes sense.

There is some art sculpture done such that when viewed you see

a base player and when you look at it 90 degrees around you

see a master playing a grand piano. A single thing can be more

than one thing. That's why the observation's perspective is so

important. We see one thing but it's really another and at the

same time both things. This duality of perspective if unknown

to the observer limits his total observation. Is the elephant

a tree, a snake, or a broom?

 

If they're right, this is amazing. All these years of reading threads on SFN where monopoles are proclaimed to be impossible... and here they are. I'm now curious to see if someone else will overturn the claims or if their conclusions are truly correct.

 

(Here's where I wish I could skip a few semesters ahead so I could actually know what the papers are talking about. That could be important.)

In my research of mobius topology I discovered a mobius monopole.

I labeled the thing with North South and the elements A,B,C. What is curious

to me is how much it resembles the topic of discussion here. If you

want to see it I made a demonstration and stuck it here.

I would be delighted if you presented some math/topology, here. You can be moved out of P&S, but you have to earn it.

I present you a hexagon so arranged that it is transformed into

a construct that has all the properties of the mobius strip save

one, it has two sides but not just sides, it has two insdes and two

outsides. You could say it represents a bipolar manifold.

Video reference: 3D 2 sided Mobius meets schrodinger's cat

other references: http://parrinello.net/~top/mobius/

you're not making any sense.

Apparently you do not possess the proper sensory equipment.

Google up 'Satire' and when you come to understand the underlying

meanings perhaps you can find the energy to crack a smile.

light doesn't accelerate. it can't go at an speed other than c

Yeah, it's pretty hard to push a mass that has no mass.

Only the Pope can project a mass that's transluminal.

. I don't like the idea of saying "it's not the same photon" or not.

Well, that as it may, you are both fundamentally correct

and incorrect. It's the perspective of the observer don't' you think?

After all, no phenomena is a phenomena unless it is an observed phenomena.

That more or less sums up as; If it tastes like chicken it's not chicken unless

it *IS* chicken.

You can quote me on that.

Full moon is tomorrow, September 4, at 16:05 UTC. We are being attack by a wave of lunatics.

You live under the same moon as they do.

When is someone going to address the acceleration of light?

Is there such a thing and if so can it be expressed as

zero to 300,000 Km in one second flat? :-D

The Mobius strip discussion was moved because it has nothing to do with the topic at hand, which is "faster than the speed of light". It is off-topic.

No problem with moving it, but to pseudoscience and speculation?

Is there not a maths or topology area where it justly fits?

I would be delighted to see it moved to the proper appropriate area.

I think we've had this discussion more recently than 3 years ago.... Have a search...

I did. Probably not very well though. Could you provide

appropriate search keys or some pointers please?

3-d space would be like a picture, never moving. There must be a fouth dimension, time, for you to even consider dimensions.

Ever thought of time as nothing more than an 'instrument' with

which motion is measured? Like a ruler measures feet?

Time has no entity, time as a dimension does not exist.

What is the 4th? Sphere element metric. A volume that is

limited by the extremes of it's container. V= 4/3Pi*r^3

Time then is a mirage and the mind is thirsty for it but

it 'evaporates' as we close in on it in the desolate

dessert of science under the scorching sun of subjective

speculation misinterpreted as fact.

Mod note:

mobius strip discussion moved here

Wow.

Well, you have shown your true color mr. ^^oderator.

Enjoy your continued discussions, You've lost my support.

I would like to hear from scientist that has had personal experiences they could not explain through their current knowledge of science.

Marriage.

You have a reduction in kinetic energy available as well, for the second set and

So you probably have greater inefficiencies than one set of blades alone.(less available power)

Hello, I know very little about windmills but I had this idea of

making some blades based on something else and although

quite unconventional they worked pretty good. I made pictures

of them and put them here:

Them I imagined up this monster:

Then it dawned on me to make an oscillating single sail windmill. It works

but needs two opposing ones to power a boat or something.

You can define, mathematically, a Mobius Strip as a two dimensional surface, it is therefore a 2d surface, no amount of playing with paper will counter that.

 

Do the math. All surfaces are 2D. When you look at the paper you miss the point. The concept resides down on infinity itself and only if something comes

to exist (field harmonics) does dimensionality take on aspects we can deal with.

The very notion of "surface" is artificial as you know by closer inspection, worlds within worlds of scale to the unreachable infinity. The paper elements

are only a lens through which many geometric pathways may be viewed.

 

This appears to be off topic though.

 

Then let's model a photon on mobius constructs and see if there are

any properties. If you saw my vid on FTL you understand there are

situations that can be applied. In the c^2 square light is seen to violate the speed of light on the hypotenuse. Perhaps there is an underlying

topography of the photon that accounts for this. Can you find it?

 

I do wonder though if gravity is just in humans minds why the planets all obey gravity?

Gravity is the effect fields of masses give rise to. Nothing more.

Merged post follows:

 

————————

 

I really dislike videos as a substitute for writing, even when they aren't from some speaking slowly and sketching badly.

 

Very nice. You have to be commended for withholding your urge to throw

"Redneck trailor trash' in there.

 

No one on earth that I know really cares what you think about videos.

 

You can't quote them to address specific topics,

 

Yes, you can!

 

and much like simply copy-paste word wallpapering from some other site, it's far too easy to simply create a BS overload.

 

Very good, now that you've baked the cake decorate it! Copy me,

Make the models I show, peer review them. Then, tell me

what is right and what is wrong.

 

If you want a critique, take the time to type in a summary of the hypothesis.

Simple: The modius strip is not a 2D object. It is a 3D object and concept.

The concepts are directly related to the universe and make up

the static topological view. Wave, particle, duality, it's all there

with the realization that the mobius strip is only the beginning.

Just for you, unless you hate cats:

I have put many mobius videos up. Over the years I have

said and wrote plenty. From FidoNet to the Internet.

Very few understood UNTIL they saw the videos.

Now they do and are making even more interesting

discoveries as they play with these tools.

If you wouldn't pull things out of it and put them on the internet, it probably wouldn't get chewed as much.

Very good. Perhaps you can address the issue and not me?

Merged post follows:

I've traveled here from 1988 to ask you what you're smoking and if I can have some.

Again, focus on me all you wish and you learn nothing, focus on

my discoveries and your view of quantum mechanics will

become more real than imaginary.

When you guys are through with my ass, take a look at my work.

http://www.youtube.com/patp2

Hello

 

I'm an artist working on an illustrative project which revolves around the theme of a paradox. Using the Mobius Loop as its central iconic symbol, the message I'm trying to convey will be that of "the beginning is also the end "

 

Feel free to artistify my mobius junk...

 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=patp2+mobius&search_type=&aq=f

yes but could gravity be used to transmit information?

 

has it been proven to be = light speed or is it just a theory?

The whole notion of transluminal speeds is interesting. I have found at least

one case (that implies there are more) where light seems to travel faster than light. This I see as virtual but the fact is the question remains unanswered as far as I know. Here it is, you can plainly see this laid out in black & white

here:

Two things are big hangups as they are non entities. These are

Gravity and Time. Neither exist in reality but in the virtual world of the

human mind they do, as mirages that cannot be approached.

Gravity is a result, nothing more. It has no entity, no particle, no wave.

No graviton will ever be found by CERN.

Time is simply a method of metrication of motion and nothing more.

Motion and time are one in the same thing equally resolvable as

as something they are not. There will be no time travel. A trillion

years ago and 1 day from now are the same instance timewise but

motionwise things are always changing. Obama wants change? Look

at the universe, that's all it is. Change.

I await my asschewing by those that 'know' the truth.