nizar

ا الThank you for your feedback! I think my idea may have been misunderstood a little — I wasn’t comparing the helicopter’s structure or its torque balance. What I meant was the rotational motion itself, like the spinning of the helicopter blades. In my analogy, this represents how the rotation of planets, galaxies, and even clusters helps maintain their stability, much like how the spinning rotor keeps the helicopter stable in the air. I meant it as a simple conceptual analogy: The centrifugal effect of rotation balances the inward pull of gravity. So, rotation acts as a stabilizing factor — in both the helicopter and cosmic systems. Of course, I’m not saying the mechanisms are identical, just that the principle of balance through rotation is similar. I appreciate your clarifications; they actually helped me express my idea more precisely!فThank you for your feedback! I think my idea may have been misunderstood a little — I wasn’t comparing the helicopter’s structure or its torque balance. What I meant was the rotational motion itself, like the spinning of the helicopter blades. In my analogy, this represents how the rotation of planets, galaxies, and even clusters helps maintain their stability, much like how the spinning rotor keeps the helicopter stable in the air. I meant it as a simple conceptual analogy: The centrifugal effect of rotation balances the inward pull of gravity. So, rotation acts as a stabilizing factor — in both the helicopter and cosmic systems. Of course, I’m not saying the mechanisms are identical, just that the principle of balance through rotation is similar. I appreciate your clarifications; they actually helped me express my idea more precisely!