Radhakrishnan J

I have to forward this to@exchemist?

I can't do it, . Because it is theoretically derived material. Would you be open to helping derive it based on symmetry and known Fe-based analogs?

Thank you for reaching out. Yes, the RTSC material idea—FeLi₂B₂H₃—is completely my own. It arises from a new theoretical framework I developed, called ICQER–ToE (Informational Constraints Quantum Event Realism), which reconceptualizes physics from first principles—not starting from particles or fields, but from event-logic constraints. So yes, AI tools were used to help generate code and diagrams, but the theory, the material formula, and the simulations were all directed by me, including the logic, validation idea, and publication structure.

I edited the post.

I have developed a theoretical concept for a room-temperature superconductor (RTSC). I theoretically derived two promising RTSC candidates: FeLi₂B₂H₃ and FeLiB₂H₃. However, I lack the funding to synthesize and test these materials. Are there alternative ways to validate their superconducting properties?"