OlegMarchenkov

This is the theory of everything. It predicts everything I tried to predict (dark matter, dark energy, quantum entanglement, quantum spin, neutron star glitches, etc). My suspicion is scientists obstinately believe that the universe can be explained only by math. I tried to add some formulas (derive gravitational constant, Hubble’s constant, Coulomb’s constant, etc) to satisfy their expectation. But I realized that it could take years to do it single-handedly. Perhaps, you can save my time and read it. I am sure you will understand it if you try to understand. Unsurprisingly, the universe model cannot be described in a short article. My 30-page article (15000 words) is divided into 7 sections: · Introduction · Construction of the universe model · Explanation of all fundamental forces and interactions · Connection to special relativity · Explanation of astronomical observations · Explanation of all remaining basic observations · Discussion of essential details omitted at the beginning It is necessary to read at least the first 3 sections (11 pages) to form basic understanding. The general assumption is that microscale physics is not fundamentally different from familiar macroscale physics. In macroscale physics, we observe particles and their interactions through forces (or "pushing"). It turns out that presenting microscale physics in the same way allows us to understand it much better. Using this model, I was able to explain all the most well-known phenomena, most notably: · Double slit experiments and quantum entanglement; · Light diffraction and the speed limit; · Fundamental forces; · Special and general relativity tests; · Evolution and structure of all celestial bodies (including black holes); · Dark energy and dark matter; · Reflection, refraction and interference; · Superconductivity and Earth magnetic field. New theoretical model of the universe 2.pdf