MerieuxMarylandPfeifield

6 minutes ago, swansont said:

I recall experiments where you can have the excited atom or a photon, but that isn’t detecting the fields. That’s absorbing the photon.

I know how the quantum venn diagram can be used to prevent a photon in array from scattering

All ball lightning/solid light sightings were the after effect of the retrocausal construction of Raven

Illinois/Missouri, Phoenix lights were just balls the v-shaped spacecraft was unique to Illinois/Missouri in the y2k scare

Society is certainly standing on a house of cards rn

It's one thing to have an idea of like how carbon doesn't melt in Earth's atmosphere in a simulation. Or how like stable moscovium could make the difference between stable fusion in a satellite that has to remain at a Lagrangian orbit to receive constant sunlight.

7 minutes ago, iNow said:

Thank you for reminding me how even ridiculous children can post dumb things on the internet 

And you meant swat, not swap. 

Yeah

I hold the key. A secret 🗝️

1 minute ago, Phi for All said:

!

Moderator Note

I split this tangent off to give you an opportunity to explain your interest. If you have none, or don't wish to discuss the science involved, I can close the thread. It's up to you to support your ideas here, and I don't think this post is really trying. More rigor, please.

 

Who do you think you are compared to me

I swap you like a fly

On 6/30/2021 at 8:49 AM, Intoscience said:

AFAIK there is no mathematical reason why time travel into the past is not possible (someone may correct me on this).

I think the issue is maybe more around the causality aspect. Essentially unless some rules are introduced, like splitting timelines, multiverses etc... then going back in time creates paradoxes, the "grandfather paradox" probably being the most popular one. Where time travelling into the past may allow effect to precede cause, which violates logic and the laws of nature.  e.g. You go back in time and kill your grandfather, which prevents you being born, which stops you going back in time to kill your grandfather...

Obviously if time travel was possible then there would have to be some mechanism to prevent paradoxes happening, hence timeline splits, or multiverses,  or no matter how you attempt to change the past something happens to prevent it etc... 

I suppose the only way to know is to test it.

So, let's get lean beef patty to knock on my 🚪

1 minute ago, exchemist said:

And......my hovercraft is full of eels. 

You're just mad

2 minutes ago, exchemist said:

Yes, I have seen it once, in a "tank farm" at a lubricating oil blending plant, during a thunderstorm. After a lightning strike, I think to one of the tanks, a glowing ball, perhaps about the size of a football, or a bit smaller, appeared, which moved along a pipe track for a few seconds and then vanished. I don't recall any sound, but I was in my office looking out through a closed window, so I can't be sure if there was any sound. This was in 1982 or so, so there were no mobile phone cameras to take a picture.

I believe the phenomenon is now at least recognised as not being an illusion, but I am not aware that anyone has been able to account for it convincingly. Perhaps others will know more. 

Light is radiation, not matter, so it can't be solid, liquid or gaseous. 

Something emitting light, presumably.

They aren't made up, an object that uses fusion would be a good source, a v shaped object. However, there's only ever been one incident, anything prior "Kenneth Arnold" et al just a test to see what people believe and if the videos are legit of balls instead of a v-shaped object it was just an after effect of retrocausal grafting of the Illinois Missouri v-shaped craft. Phoenix lights and Lubbock lights also made up

They put the Illinois footage in this video to trick people

I'm referring to an event that has been well documented as evidence of what secrets I hold I am tired of playing this game.

"

The historical codex, theory of everything, cracks QM, unlike relativity and newton's laws of universal motion it's a function f(t)=

Part 1; an 324 columb and 2 row [x y] coordinate matrix (sphere worlds) plus another 324 columb 2 row coordinate matrix (quantum gravity).

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

[n n]

Etc...

Part 2; You take every integer in the first two matrices to the power of the product of those two matrices. Like Russian matryoshka dolls you have to do this n number times, n=radius of observable universe over the planck length. & we must root every exponent in the -z direction to superimpose the smaller and smaller x and y values in the +z direction. && everytime we do this we need to take out the top exponent from power towers and redo it for counting down to the x y coordinates of the z vector which is the center of the codex, let's call this operation V for vector. Problem with operation V, you will lose entire matrices of coordinates when you remove an exponent from the power tower, so now we must rectify that by putting op V through the power tower and plugging those values back into the base matrix, and then redoing the full power-tower with these adjusted values, but this time rooting every other iteration of exponential matrices in the power tower so that the values remain the same. 

Ex)

Vector +3

Ex)

[n1 n1]____[n2 n2]____[n3 n3]

________+__________=_____________

[n1 n1]____[n2 n2]____[n3 n3]

&

[n1 n1]___[n3 n3]____[x1 y1]

_______+_________=2*______

[n1 n1]___[n3 n3]____[x1 y1]

&&

[n2 n2]___[n3 n3]__[x2 y2]

________+________=2*______

[n2 n2]___[n3 n3]__[x2 y2]

&&&

___[x1 y1]____[x2 ny2]__[n4 n4]

+/-_______+/-________=__________

___[x1 y1]____[x2 y2]__[n4 n4]

&&&&

[n3 n3]___[n4/2 n4/2]__[nx ny]___[n5 n5]

________+_____________+________=________

[n3 n3]___[n4/2 n4/2]__[nx ny]___[n5 n5]

where, nx & ny = geometric equations applied to the [n3 n3] columns' gravitational tug and [n4 n4] matrix gets divided by 2 because of the inverse square law for [n2 n2]'s gravitational tug applied to [n3 n3]'s position from when it was [n1 n1]

The practical use of the codex is evolving the observable universe from the moment of the big bang to now. 

You will acquire a printout of all of the atoms of the periodic table, and how their quantum particles behave, with a magnification of up to 26 orders of magnitude greater than that offered by an electron microscope, and how micro lasers will effect a quantum system every planck second after your instruments perturb a system.

Unlike normal quantum teleportation, which involves changes over lateral time, the codex can instead be used to teleport quantum objects using particle confusion, which is a result of analog quantum gravity, as gravity propagates in two directions, moving n-number of sphere worlds that collide to generate one higgs function to the exact quantum phonetic frequency of another higgs function, will duplicate that higgs function precisely where the other higgs function is located.

This works because all potential universes are so similar at the quantum scale."

https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/38131-historical-codex/?do=findComment&comment=394227

&&

"

The device in the experiment on harnessing controlled ballistic as a potential over unity device will involve hundreds of imperfect carbon nanotubes (more for conducting electricity and absorbing heat than durability), with 32 simultaneous and continuous rotary features powered by electric impulses (that's the energy input in the denominator of the over unity calculation because the sunlight is free), & 16 polarizing light filters. Whereas the numerator would be the overall energy output of the continuous laser pulse it generates if successful.

If successful as an over unity device, it would be installed into one of the satellites over earth that have static orbits in order to receive continuous sunlight along with and integrated into a miniaturized version of the tokamak fusion reactor."

&&&

https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/38229-counter-rotary-feature-of-quantum-tunneling/

No, but I have witnessed at one time a green fireball, and more recently a yellow fireball.

Solid light?

7 minutes ago, MigL said:

So, who flipped the perspective through time of your consciousness ?

Brain

15 minutes ago, zapatos said:

This thread is not about time travel. If you wish to discuss time travel you should open your own thread on that topic.

Everything is about time travel. For instance, your very own continuity of consciousness has a perspective trough time. Flip that perspective and you have split personality, which is a psychological condition. So you see, all of these things are related to the au current crisis of discussion.

11 hours ago, exchemist said:

Yes this criticism has a point.

It seems to me that the deepest mystery of all about the universe is where the order in it (what we call the "laws of nature", though actually the laws are just our models of the order, as we perceive it) comes from.  As far as science can go , it "just is". We have to accept it as a given. 

Rather interestingly, it seems that, to Einstein and Spinoza, this order effectively is what we commonly call "God".

 

 

So what are thoughts on time travel?

Apparently carbon is 100% unmeltable, but only when in Earth's atmosphere. 

In 2000

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hjw4BCmOxWQ

This landmark

https://i.ibb.co/qkjJCXM/screens-shot-842021116.jpg

Acts as my PhD because I'm explaining the source of the object that leveled this

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2021/06/640/320/what-an-e-state-698074.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

And the lasers in the 2021 film Voyagers.

I need a negasonic teenage warhead