Weitter Duckss

1. From NGC 7320c  (10 Mpc) onwards, try to determine on these distances the amount of the constant expansion of the universe.

2. I'm just giving official (mainstream) evidence. I'm not dealing with theories (that's what I said right away).

Good night.

-I agree, "That's not surprising." Surprise is the existence of blue shift within the expansion.

„You need to provide a statistical analysis of a large number of observations to show it is not just due to chance.“ And „You make a LOT of claims that run counter to accepted science.“

Small, large mergers and collisions between galaxies, galaxy clisters and supercluster is for you a small number?  

Quote: „Collisions between galaxy clusters“ (72).. shows blue shift between these clustrs. All galaxy clusters (except ours) have a red shift.

There are several hundred active links on my page (it's just part of the database) by objects and bodies with deviations that do not follow „Although we have (with increasing distance) increase red shift (z), the distance may decrease or growth“.

Galaxy	Distance Mly	Red shift km/s
NGC 1073	80          kly	1208 ± 5
NGC 1169	114 ± 27 kly	2387 ± 5
NGC 1.600	149,3 kly	4.681
Messier 33	2.38 to 3.07	-179 ± 3  (blue shift)
Messier 32	2.49 ± 0.08	-200 ± 6
NGC 1569	10,96 ± 0,65	-104
NGC 404	10-13	-48 ± 9
NGC 2976	11,6±1,2	3 ± 5
NGC 4236	~11,7	0±2
NGC 3077	12,8±0,7	14 ± 4
NGC 6946	22,5±7,8	48±2
NGC 7320c	35	5.985 ± 9
NGC 7320	39 (12 Mpc)	786 ± 20
NGC 2541	41 ± 5	548 ± 1
NGC 4178	43 ± 8	377
NGC 4214	44	291 ± 3
M98	44.4	−0.000113 ± 0.000013
Messier 77	47.0	1137 ± 3
NGC 14	47.1	865 ± 1
Messier 88	47 ± 8	2235 ± 4
IC 3258	48	-0,0015 (-517)
NGC 3949	50	800 ± 1
NGC 3877	50,5	895 ± 4
NGC 4088	51,5 ± 4,5	757 ± 1
NGC 1427A	51,9 (+5,3, -7,7)	2028 ± 1
NGC 1055	52	994 ± 5
M86	52 ± 3	-244 ± 5
Messier 61	52.5 ± 2.3	1483 ± 4
NGC 4216	55	131 ± 4
Messier 60	55 ± 4	1117 ± 6
NGC 4526	55±5	448 ± 8
Messier 99	55,7	2407 ± 3
NGC 4419	56	-0,0009 (-342)
M90	58.7 ± 2.8	−282 ± 4
Messier 59	60 ± 5	410 ± 6
NGC 4013	60,6 ± 8,1	831 ± 1
Messier 58	62	1517 ± 1
NGC 4414	62,3	790 ± 5
RMB 56	65,2	-327
NGC 613	67.5	1487
NGC 1427	71±8	1388 ± 3
NGC 148	85.56	1516
NGC 473	98	2.134
NGC 3370	98	1.279
NGC 3021	~100	1541
NGC 3244	100	2758
NGC 7007	131,13	3098
NGC 5010	140	2975 ± 27
NGC 7074	140	3476
NGC 9	142 ± 31	4528 ± 10
NGC 922	150	3063
NGC 12	183	3941 ± 4
NGC 127	188	409
NGC 106	199	6.059
NGC 6872	212	4.555 ± 30
NGC 5	212	5111 ± 41
NGC 21	234 ± 29	4770 ± 4
NGC 476	261	6337 ± 126
NGC 7047	270	5811
NGC 965	294	6794 ± 39
NGC 800	300	5.966
NGC 1128	300	6940 ±20
NGC 90	333.8 ± 146	5353 ± 10
NGC 300	447	9.740
NGC 280	464	3.878
NGC 427	467	10.162

 

Deviation from a few units usually breaks theory without evidence. For example:

„The body in orbit around the Sun	.........Minimum temperatures °K	.........Distance .from the Sun AU
1	Mercury	80 (100 equator)	0,39
2	Moon	100	1
3	Mars	143	1.52
4	Vesta	85	2,36
5.	Ceres	168	2,77
6	67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko	180	3,46
7	Ganymede	70	5,20
8	Callisto	80±5	5.20
9	Triton	38	30,11
10	Pluto	33	39,48

Table 19. Sun system, temperature deviation, relationship: minimum temperatures °K/distance from the Sun AU.

These measurements of minimal temperatures show deviations from the accepted claims that the intensity of ("termal") radiation decreases with the square distance. Except Mars and Pluto, not all objects have enough quantity of atmosphere, which could cause doubt about the correct way of selecting objects in the example. If a factor of measurement imprecision is also taken into consideration, the deviations are still impossible to be removed as they show that the objects from the examples  1 – 5,20 AU have the same or higher minimal temperatures than Mercury and they are also of the lesser or similar mass. Mercury and Ceres are in a group of objects, which are explored equally well and in details; however, it is shown that the minimal temperature on Ceres is two times higher, even though it should be decreasing, according to the law of radiation intensity decrease with the increase of square distance. „ ...

-Photographs (mainstream) are a substitute for math. Figure 25 is an indisputable proof.

- Here's math clear:

„If deviation is excluded and minimal temperatures are observed very roughly, it is obvious that there is a temperature decrease with the increase in distance: „Mean Solar Irradiance (W/m2) on Mercury is 9.116,4, Earth  1.366,1, Jupiter 50,5, na Pluto 0,878.“ [33]“

Registered within the universe are the temperature below 3 ° C (1 °).  Next Level (Multi Space) yet more distances sources of radiation inside the space (falling temperature) ...

 

I appreciate your opinion.

I just (as always) pass official evidence, placed in a series of relationships.

Red shift

Although we have (with increasing distance) increase red shift (z), the distance may decrease or growth:

Leo_Cluster.............................368,6 Mly..............(z)....0,022

ARP 87………..........… distance..330 Mly.........................0,023726

Abell 2152...............................551................................0,041

Hydra_Cluster..........................190,1.............................0,0548

 

Abell 671.................................600................................0,0502

Abell 1060..... .........................190,1.............................0,0548

Abell_1991..............................812................................0,05870

Corona Borealis Supercluster..946................................0,07

Laniakea Supercluster…..........250................................0,0708

Abell 2029.............................1063................................0,0767

 

Abell 383................................2485...............................0,1871

Abell 520 ….....distance..........2645 Mly........red shift ..0,2

Abell_222(3)...........................2400 Mly.............. z ...... 0,2110

 

Saraswati Supercluster ..........4000................................0,28

Bullet Cluster......................... 3700................................0,296

Abell 2744……………................3982 Mly.........................0,308
CID-42....................................3900................................0,359

 

Abell_370 ..............................4775................................0.375

3C_295...................................4600................................0,464

Musket Ball Cluster ................ 700 Mly..........................0,53

Abell 754……….......………..........760 Mly..........................0,542

 

MACS J0025.4-1222 ..............6070 Mly.........................0,586

Phoenix Cluster......................5700................................0,597

RX J1131-1231.......................6050................................0,658

ACT-CL J0102-4915............... 4000.................................0,87

 

Lynx Supercluster ................12000 Mly.........................1,26, 1,27

Twin Quasar...........................8700................................1,413

XMMXCS_2215-1738...........10000................................1,45

Einstein Cross  …….................8000 Mly......................... 1,695

TON 618...............................10400.................................2,219

 

A2744 YD4...........................13200................................ 8,38

UDFy-38135539...................13100.................................8,6

GRB 090429B.......................13140.................................9,4                      etc.

 

Today in the database we have from 100 to over 8300 discovered galaxies that have a negative velocity (blue shift).

We also have a (mainstream) evidence of interacting galaxies (small, large mergers and collisions between galaxies). Within the objects that merge or collide there is only a blue shift. These galaxies for us may have a red shift.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Interacting_galaxies

The increase in red shift (due to my and similar tables) is tied to larger objects (unsuccessful).

https://www.spacetelescope.org/static/archives/releases/science_papers/heic1506a.pdf

Quote: „Collisions between galaxy clusters provide a test of the non-gravitational forces acting on dark matter. Dark matter’s lack of deceleration in the ‘bullet cluster collision’ constrained its self-interaction cross-section σDM/m < 1.25 cm2/g (68% confidence limit) for long-ranged forces. Using the Chandra and Hubble Space Telescopes we have now observed 72 collisions, including both ‘major’ and ‘minor’ mergers. .“  end quote

DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.2115 W.D.

 

Abstract
This article is about a constant growth of objects and systems in the Universe, based on: the forces of matter attraction (gravity), rotation and its speed with their effects, too, the creation of whirls and cyclones as a result of the rotation of objects, systems and the Universe. The creation of light is related to the effects and force of waves (radiation) in their collision with visible matter. It is proven here that a redshift is directly related to the weakening intensity of waves to the distant objects. Instead of being over-intellectual, this text, as a form of evidence, also introduces images, created by the direct observation (NASA, ESA, etc.) or based on the observations of the other astronomers and their published findings.

1. Introduction
The main goal of the article is to document a visible matter's constant growth, ranging from the smallest particles to the largest systems. The creation of systems, from small objects, stars and the most complex systems, is analyzed through the forces of attraction, the rotation around their axis and the processes that are a consequence of the rotation and gravity. Some accent is also placed on the whirls and cyclones that occur on the poles of gaseous objects, stars and the centers of regular galaxies, which themselves are a product of their own rotation. Light is documented here as a product of collision between waves and the visible matter and it is also shown why the Universe is dark. A redshift is analyzed through the weakening intensity of waves, which is detected by the astronomers' instruments.
The articles [5], [7], [10] and [11], with this one, too, make the integral part of a constant growth, rotation and its effects, cyclones, light and redshift.

2. A Constant Growth of Objects And Systems Inside the Universe 
The processes of matter attraction inside and outside our Universe are based on the evidence and the fundamental principle of matter attraction. ..

6. Conclusion
Millions of percussive craters scattered on the objects in our entire system, the daily influx of matter to Earth and the other objects, small and large mergers, collisions and other interactions among the objects, galaxies and galactic clusters are the representation of the process of the constant growth of the objects and systems. The existence of orbits, star systems, binary systems and other systems (from galaxies to superclusters, the Universe and the Multiverse) is impossible in the space without the effects of an object's and a system's rotation around their axis. The objects that have no rotation, or have an extremely slow one, do not create orbits around themselves. The objects with an independent rotation do not create orbits around their poles, where there is no effect of the rotation around the axis. The cyclones are the product of rotation. By sucking matter in, they increase or decrease the speed of an object's rotation. Only a very small quantity of the objects has a very high speed of rotation (O type and White Dwarf 0,0005% of the total quantity of stars in Milky Way). Light is the product of the collision between waves (radiation) and the visible matter. Space is very cold and dark where there is no visible matter or the intensity of waves is very low. Beyond the third level above the Universe the temperature of space is at 0° K. All processes at the absolute zero are extremely slow or in the state of rest. A red spectrum is a product of the weakening of the wave intensity, with the increase of the objects' orbital speeds inside clusters, galactic superclusters and the Universe. The decrease of the wave intensity is observed the best in our system from Mercury to the Oort cloud (Solar radiation pressure lbf/mi², 0.1 AU 526; 0.46 AU = Merkur 24.9; … 5.22 AU = Jupiter 0.19). ..

https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/  (1.  Introduction article)

The discussion did not start as a discussion.

Tables of the topic are sufficient for discussion. It should be read as text (with proofs).

I. Bodies of the same mass are found in all classes (from O to M). The height of the temperature is not dependent on mass, bodies (planets) with mass 12 M Jup. achieve autonomously high temperatures (they do not reflect only the radiation).

II and III. The speed of rotation regulates the systems and their appearance. Etc.

https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Universe-and-rotation.html#The-processes-which-cause-the-appearance-of-objects-and-systems

Topic is: Effects of Rotation Around the Axis (with evidence from multiple databases).

Judges of „American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics“, Author Weitter Duckss.

I want to see your (personal) opinion on the subject. Please, use proof in the debate. Avoid theories and hypotheses.

I.

Star…………………….Type………………Mass Sun=1……Temperature °K

EZ Canis Majoris..WN3-hv………….19…………………..89.100

Centaurus X-3………O……………….20.5 ± 0.7………….39.000

η Canis Majores…..B…………………19,19……………….15.000

HD 21389…………….A…………………19,3………………….9.730

Kappa Pavonis……..F………………..19 – 25…………..5,250 - 6,350

V382 Carinae……….G…………………20…………………5,866

S Persei……………….M…………………20……………….3.000-3.600

DH Tauri b..Planet; dist. 330 AU..12 M Jupiter….2.750

HIP 78530 b..Planet; dist. 740 AU..24 M Jup…….2.700 (2.800)

 

II.

galaxies....................type galaxies................Speed of galaxies

Fast-rotating galaxies

RX J1131-1231..........quasar.................half the speed of light

Spindle galaxy.......elliptical galaxy.......significant amount of rotation around axis“

NGC 6109………..Lenticular Galaxy……..40 ± 8 rad m−2

 

Contrary to: Slow Rotation

Andromeda………….spiral galaxy…………..225 km/s

UGC 12591…………..spiral galaxy…………..500 km/s,

Milky Way……………spiral galaxy……………210 ± 10 (220 km/s Sun)

 

III.

Galaxies…………………….type of galaxies……………….speed of galaxies

Large galaxies (fast-rotating)

APM 08279+5255…….elliptical galaxy………………..giant elliptical galaxy [25]

Q0906 + 6930…………..blazar……………………………..the most distant known blazar

OJ 287 BL…………………Lacertae object………………..the largest known objects

S5 0014 + 81……………blazar……………………………….giant elliptical galaxy

H1821 + 643…………...quasar……………………………..the most massive black hole

Contrary to: Dwarf galaxies (fast-rotating)

Messier 110………….elliptical galaxy…………………dwarf elliptical galaxy

Messier 32…………."early-type"……………………….dwarf "early-type" galaxy

NGC 147………………spheroidal galaxy………………dwarf spheroidal galaxy

NGC 185……………..spheroidal galaxy………………dwarf spheroidal galaxy

 

The topic was approved by judges. I hope it will not immediately end up on the black list.