LIFTING RESTRICTIONS BETWEEN SCIENTISTS

COPYRIGHT

Copyright is the exclusive right given to the creator of a creative work to reproduce the work, usually for a limited time. The creative work may be in a literary, artistic, educational, or musical form. Copyright is intended to protect the original expression of an idea in the form of a creative work, but not the idea itself. A copyright is subject to limitations based on public interest considerations, such as the fair use doctrine in the United States. Some jurisdictions require "fixing" copyrighted works in a tangible form. It is often shared among multiple authors, each of whom holds a set of rights to use or license the work, and who are commonly referred to as rights holders. These rights frequently include reproduction, control over derivative works, distribution, public performance, and moral rights such as attribution.

Copyrights can be granted by public law and are in that case considered "territorial rights". This means that copyrights granted by the law of a certain state, do not extend beyond the territory of that specific jurisdiction. Copyrights of this type vary by country; many countries, and sometimes a large group of countries, have made agreements with other countries on procedures applicable when works "cross" national borders or national rights are inconsistent.

Typically, the public law duration of a copyright expires 50 to 100 years after the creator dies, depending on the jurisdiction. Some countries require certain copyright formalities to establishing copyright, others recognize copyright in any completed work, without formal registration.

With the level of danger we achieved in the current situation, are we allowed to lifted such restrictions, about data, strategy and strain of virus (under certain limitation).

I'm in the process to achieved a reasoning about a way to slow down a Coronavirus, type Delta, infection by another one of lesser importance. Could you please giving me some argue about those two sheets:

WORKING AROUND T-CELLS CYTOTOXIN

The point is that Coronavirus is not possessing the good membrane proteins, or viral peptides, to be the target of the immune system correctly, because, if it was the case, vaccine will arise rapidly. So why not insert a regular virus that possess what is missing, like flu virus, that is killed almost easily by the body. That Virus shall be from a strain where one or many proteins are missing but included in the Coronavirus.

So when the duo will arise, the cell will be targeted by the T-Cells and being destroyed:

The most important, in the selection of the attacking mutated virus, is it's capacity to trig the immune system. I mean, that the fact of non evasive escalation must not takes is source in the non-penetration of the host cells. There is in the NCBI database of genes, avian Coronavirus, that have been studied in the past, with high correlation base on BLAST software, the big problem is certainly my incapacity to determined the source of the non-infection of the Human specie by such strain (ex.: Avian infectious bronchitis virus (strain 6/82)). But, I'm insisting than by logic, it should be the case

So, the best strain will be the one with the lowest infection exponentiation, with a immune system triggering...

15 hours ago, MigL said:

I think he went to Proxima Centauri.
When he comes back in a year's time he might have proof.

Maybe

13 hours ago, Mordred said:

At 4.244 light years distance he would have to have a working FTL drive lol. 

I have to leave, see you next time, in a year, maybe 🥰.  Yes...

No, but I swear that I saw the results personally, If you know what I mean!

6 minutes ago, Mordred said:

CERN fires protons to cause collisions yet the particles they decay

You could try some of my experiments, why yours are better? If once done they gives rise to evidence… from a hobbys Physicist  

1 minute ago, Strange said:

If you are not even willing/able to do the schoolboy math of special relativity

Waste of time, unless you could dilated it to fraction of second.

1 minute ago, Strange said:

I don't think your "opinions" on gravity and energy conservation have much basis.

Up to you, the future will teach us the truth...

2 minutes ago, Strange said:

And what is a "gravitational line"?

Much density close to the center of mass, and less over distance!

Now you could close this subject if you want, but It's a big win to me, in a relativistic point of view

5 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Lol they even measured the time dilation between a persons foot to his head.

I don't want to make you upset, but my personal opinion is that gravitational lines are not conservative in energy, that's why!  This clock will do the trick...

In resume, that is what we need to verify? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_acceleration

1 minute ago, Mordred said:

Not if you properly understand what is curved under universe geometry.

I do not, could you explain?

7 minutes ago, Mordred said:

The universe is close to flat

Base on actual measurement, the surface of that flat universe, would be seriously huge

What do you think about that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-torus_model_of_the_universe

Ok, now I understand that the light observation, is equal in every direction...

3 minutes ago, Strange said:

Who is "our best scientist"? And where did the they claim this?

Hawking, did, but maybe bad citation, sorry… Did you read his thesis ?

6 minutes ago, Strange said:

The math is very simple.

Not at all, but I will try to do some calculation for you, in the next hours...

Our best scientist claimed that a long time ago. Is this still true?

I agree Einstein theory must be apply correctly, if we want to compare it, and verify it... 

Is that link could help: https://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Einstein/Einstein_Relativity.pdf

4 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Both the emitter and observer is at coordinate time.

I don't understand correctly, do you mean that there is no time dilation at speed close to light speed?

2 minutes ago, Mordred said:

First off the Lorentz transforms are under constant velocity not acceleration though one can use instantaneous velocity at each coordinate to adjust for constant acceleration.

In fact, we need proper time, so proper acceleration, because, otherwise, it will be too complexe for me, in time, to discuss that with you, based on Einstein Theory.

What will be the time on the ship clock, if Einstein was wrong, and if He was right, depending on a trip at constant acceleration to or from those two planets? The advantage is to discuss about the theory...

It's the best I can do, It's unknown theory: If you let me continue, I will implement better and better over time...

40 minutes ago, Ghideon said:

The theory was tested and did not match experiments and observations.

And if the Aether is fixed around the Sun, the experiment was in agreement the medium theory...

Could someone explain me the current Believe on that concept?

What will be the step to verify relativity in constant acceleration between earth and proxima centory ?

I'm still alive, if someone want to argue :)