NumberlineA

Does a ideal electric charge distribution have a global magnetic field?  No, if there is no motion.  Yes, if there is motion.

Is a physical experiment in four dimensions?  Sometimes yes and sometimes no.

Is Quantum Gravity as radical as Quantum Physics is to Newtonian Physics?  It just flows to the creator.

A black hole with the mass of thirty billion suns has some wicked smart gravity.  Gravity causes acceleration.

Near a Black Hole the speeds are enormous and so also the red shifts.

The wave is red shift when the emitting object is go away from you. The wave is blue shifted when the object is coming towards you. Make your base in between.

Changing red shift is changing frequency, is changing wave length, and is changing energy of the gravitational wave.

Conservation of Linear Momentum

 In the collision of two non rotating objects all the before and after momentum is in one plane.  The two incoming vectors and two out going vectors are all in the one plane.  Every freshman physics textbook has Chapter 3, Motion in Two Dimensions.  The dimensions are not reduced to two dimensions. No third dimension necessary to do the physics.

Varying red shift is from motion to and fro which is the decaying orbit of the black hole which can be used to find the mass.

Relativity says that gravitational waves must red shift.  Red shift is the only way to determine the mass of the black hole merger.

One reply says that two plus two spacetime, (t,x) & (y,z), is consistent with all known physics.  The other reply says that a sphere is too for real math.

Does an electric charge distribution have a magnetic field?

Does a circle have a cylinder?

Gravity is 2D conic sections - parabola, ellipse, hyperbola. The surface of a sphere is two dimensional The earth has latitude and longitude to find any point.

Like Maxwell's Laws are the interplay of electro and magnetism so the Unified Field Theory is the interplay of dimensions.

That's point number 7 in the top post of the Unified Field Theory.

Two plus two spacetime is Kepler's ellipses and Coulomb's outer surfaces. Its 2D discs and 2D spheres.

The inverse square law is through a spherical surface.

  For planet detection the change in the red shift of light tell the wobble in the star.  Then Newton's modification of Kepler's Third Law gives the mass.

How did LIGO determine the mass of distant black hole mergers?

LIGO found the direction to the merger from the time difference of the two detectors and from the polarization of the gravitational waves.

Was the gravitational wave that was detected a combination of more then one gravitational wave?

Three dimensions and the inverse square law.

  The man from the flooring company came over to measure the rooms for carpet. He measured the length and width of all the rooms. I said to him, you didn't measure the height of any of the rooms. You are only considering two dimensions. He said that he's not denying the existence of the ceiling heights.

People read the top line of the top post (t,x) (y,z), dismissed it, and hit the reply button.

The statements 1-7 are standard physics that can be found in a thousand textbooks.

All that the top post adds is a parenthesis (t,x) (y,z). That's clerical bookkeeping.  It says 10th grade geometry is for real.

(t,x,y,z) trajectories equal (t,x) (y,z) Quantum jumps.  No standard physics has been rejected.

top post points 1, 2, and 3 is explained above.

Number 4 says that the two spherical angles are not contracted separating the dimensions in two and two

Number 5 says that Mercury stays in a 2D plane

Number 6 shows the two coincide

Number 7 shows how to map 2D discs and 2D surface

This is all geometric mathematics

Let's stay focused on the top post that is convincing the world of 2+2 dimensional spacetime:  (t,x) (y,z)

Quantum Jumps and Distant Quantum Entanglement are only applications of the theory.

Up above I explained points 1, 2, and 3 after being told they are cryptic.  Does points 4, 5, 6, and 7 need explicated?

Once more, Geometry is Mathematics

A three dimensional vector is a coordinate rotation to a two dimensional vector.

What's the geometric picture of quantum jumps and distant quantum entanglement.  EPR says that its non locality and non realism. Non locality is a feature of two plus two spacetime.

Back to the top post 1,2, and 3.  Once we have SR doesn't contract y and z, well electric charge doesn't contract spacetime.  But SR does have the amplitude of light (y and z) contracted. That shows Coulombic components of spacetime.

We can go line for line on the top post.  Special Relativity contracts x and dilates t.  Special Relativity doesn't contract y and z. Therefore we separate the dimensions into two and two components.

Not gonna quibble over what proof means. That's like saying it's just a theory.

Geometry is Mathematics. See top post.

No one on earth can explain quantum jumps or distant quantum entanglement without two plus two dimensional spacetime.

By the Bohr Correspondence Principle 3+1 trajectories are 2+2 quantum jumps

Einstein's final Unified Field Theory was Distant Parallelism but he was too wed to Minkowski's 4D spacetime continuum

Proof of 2 + 2 Spacetime corresponding to the two (approximate) inverse square laws:

1) In Special Relativity the transverse directions are not contracted

2) The Coulomb Force doesn't contract spacetime

3) The amplitude of light is contracted in Special Relativity

4) In the Schwarzchild Metric the transverse directions are not contracted

5) The Advancement of the Perihelion of Mercury stays in the orbital plane

6) The Speed of Light equals the Speed of Gravity

7) Kepler's Laws of Ellipses and Coulomb's Law of outer surfaces map spacetime