Hami Hashmi

Ok, so there is a finite pressure where electrons collapse into the nucleus? 

I know that in a normal atom the Heisenberg uncertainty principle prevents the electron from doing this, but what if there was an infinite attraction (infinite force) between the nucleus and the electron? Would the electron fall in then?

ok thanks.

bump

How do i simulate it? I looked around but I couldnt find a way to do it.

Like a magnetic shield surrounded by an electric insulator covering.

Is this one good? https://www.falstad.com/vector3dm/ And how do i simulate what i mentioned above?

Ok. So I type down magnetic field simulator?

8 hours ago, swansont said:

Really, what you need to do is find a simulator that will answer these questions, or, for the simplest geometries, solve the equations yourself.

How would i find those simulators?

And how would i use them to solve this question?

Ok, what if you wrapped the mu-metal in a layer of nonconducting material with the wires on top? What would happen then?

10 hours ago, Strange said:

Are you asking if it is possible to change the spin of a (fundamental) particle like a proton? That has already been answered (no). 

So what is your question?

ok thanks that's what i wanted to know.

13 hours ago, beecee said:

 

The mathematical singularity where GR fails us, involves infinite spacetime curvature and infinite density, and this is why cosmologists do not believe it exists. Although we have no actual empirical evidence of what happens inside a BH, GR does tell us that once the Schwarzchild radius of any given mass is reached, further collapse is compulsory. But at the quantum/Planck level GR fails us, so it is I believe reasonable to assume that the mass resides somewhere at that level, before the infinities are reached. At the same time once any matter crosses the EH, it undergoes increasing stress [elongation/spaghetification] from the tidal gravity effects and depending on the size of the BH, will be broken down into its most basic fundamental parts, on its way to or at the quantum/planck/Singularity level. I think I have that reasonably accurate, if not someone who knows better can correct.

Ok thanks. But if a singularity did exist, would my theory (post #10) be valid?

4 hours ago, Hami Hashmi said:

So you are saying that a singularity does not really exist?

And if it did, would my theory (post #10) be valid?

16 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

The angular momentum of a black hole is a property of the entire spacetime, and not of the singularity (which only arises in our models in the first place because we can‘t yet account for quantum effects). Furthermore, while spin can be considered a form of angular momentum, it is quite different from the one of macroscopic bodies.

So you are saying that a singularity does not really exist?

Hi

Sorry, will still be enhanced around the poles? 

The only reason why i was wondering is because it is possible to change the angular momentum of a singularity (which is a point) so I thought it would be possible to do the same with two point particles using magnetism.

Ok. So the magnetic field will be enhanced around the poles?

Ok nevermind about that but what if the box was made from a material that had very high permiability, very high saturation rate, a extremely low coercivity, near zero magnetostriction, and extremely large anisotropic magnetoresistance? Would it dampen the magnetic field uniformly then?

22 hours ago, swansont said:

What do you mean by saturation is 0?

Magnetic field lines have to make closed loops. That limits what you can do.

Oh ok. I meant that if the actual mu-metal box had a saturation of 0 would it be able to dampen the field then.

Would a box made out of magnetic monopoles be able to dampen the field? (I know they are theoretical).

2 minutes ago, swansont said:

That's basically what it shows. The ambient field is uniform, and with the shielding, the flux lines concentrate at the end as they bunch up in the material.

Even if the saturation was 0 the outside field would be similar?

And if not, is there any possible way for a material (theoretical or otherwise) to dampen the magnetic field uniformly in this instance?

20 hours ago, Externet said:

I would say the magnetic field will be contained and follow the mu-metal path with minimal field outside it.

Your sketch should define/identify the colored sections to better understand you.

Well in the sketch the red areas are the areas with highest field density. 

hello

...