civilizedvisualpresence

3 minutes ago, pzkpfw said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia

Pareidolia

I agree with you when it is only one object, or even a couple of objects. But when the number of such objects it is increased to considerable value, then the evaluation should take some extra work. Wish you a happy and long life, thank you for your comment.

10 minutes ago, Moontanman said:

Video are frowned on as evidence on this site and yours are considerably less than convincing. Again i ask you for the most convincing sighting you know of, I have a few but you are the OP of this thread... 

The evidence which I know are extremely zoomed view of objects over the moon and on the moon, and even other objects in space, however I admit that I am not the cradle of the truth because the truth needs lengthy discussions of many scientific minds, and you are the respectful subject of it. I was a skeptic myself before doing the filming of space myself.

1 minute ago, John Cuthber said:

Serious scientific research requires evidence- usually repeatable evidence. So, you can't do research on things that don't provide evidence.
That's not a "taboo", it's the basis of science so, if we say we don't need to follow it in this line of research, what's to stop people deciding to ignore it in other fields?

Would you like to break the taboo and allow , for example, medicines that have no basis in evidence?

 

I agree with your comment and in principle I am trying only to ignite the analytical thinking such as yours in order to prove authenticity, and avoid the race for profit from many scientific circles in order to simplify the premises of started serious research, and not admitting to manipulation. Wish you a happy and long life.

9 minutes ago, beecee said:

While certainly I accept and believe we are not alone for obvious reasons, as yet we have absolutely no evidence of any life beyond Earth. Many cosmologists though are of the opinion that we may have convincing evidence of ETL within a decade.

If by chance we were alone, it would raise far many more questions though then the affirmative.

UFO's are simply just that...unidentified with a small percentage remaining as unexplained.

 

No, I have not watched your crap videos.

6 minutes ago, Moontanman said:

I come close to qualifying as a genuine UFO nut, how would you suggest we scientifically investigate a phenomenon that seems to occur at random intervals and has no evidence other than eye witnesses, fuzzy photos, videos of lights in the sky? The very best evidence consists of photos of "something" that appears to be unknown and radar returns that could be natural or secrete technology. The videos you have provided are nothing but fluff... 

What UFO sighting do you think is conclusive evidence of aliens? 

Thank you for your comment, but with due respect do no read only the cover of a book if you want to know what the book is about. I trust in your patience to take the short time of watching and analyzing the provided information, which is not for profit. Wish you a happy and long life.

We need to break the taboo that does not allow serious scientific research to create grounds for serious scientific studies of the presence of the flying vehicles of extraterrestrials and their artificial structures on our moon, in order to use the outcome of such scientific research for radical improvement of our technology with the only purpose to serve the improvement of our standard of life for all our humanity of our civilization on this Earth, and to avoid and prevent militarization of our societies, avoid politics of mob-populism, improve our social relations in order to distinguish between like and dislike and avoiding extreme feelings of hate and disgust, and with the end goal achievements to prevent proxy wars and threats of nuclear weapons.