antiaging

May 24, 2009

List all the contradictions then. Chances are they are misconceptions rather than problems with the theories themselves.

Get on google and look up: contradictions electromagnetic math

13000 results, first 10 pages presented

You can go down the list and find maybe 2 or 3 genuine contradictions per page.

Years ago I downloaded a page full of math contradictions in electromagnetic theory. On a another computer I had. I know that it can be found if you look for it.

May 23, 2009

You didn't actually address any of my points (which is pretty common among the pseudoscientists), but if you "don't have too much time to spend in cyberspace" why are you bothering to post here?

Again, why aren't you out demonstrating these things you have discovered and making yourself a boatload of cash? If everything works like you say it does, you will be fabulously wealthy, you won't have to work 40 hours a week, you can sleep 12 hours a day if you want, and pay other people to go to cyberspace and defend the ideas.

Why aren't you out there doing it instead of trying to convince a bunch of random strangers on the Internet with unconvincing evidence? You know what would be convincing... actually making machines based on the principles in the book and selling them! Not stories about your concrete block, not stories about some dude who was malnourished, not stories about some magic coral stone thingy in Florida -- actually go out and do it!

If it is as easy as you say, you should be able to make quite a lot of money in a very short amount of time. So, quit wasting time posting here and go start that company, make several million bucks, and then come back in 2 years and tell us all "I told you so!".

I am answering this because you asked why I am not making money on this.

Shortly before I got my physics degree I did an experiment to test for the existence of God. I got definite evidence from that experiment a became a born again saved Christian and a bible scholar. I do what I feel God leading me to do. I am not led to chase after money.

I post mostly on christian forums, on bible issues and trying to save infidels from the fires of hell is the prime conscern, for me. not making money or science.

I could give you the experiment I did for that and the evidence I got, but it would be stopped by the atheist moderators here.

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

How come all of our INDEPENDENT methods for measuring things such as electron mass match up? And how do things like electron microscopes work if the electron does not exist?

There is FAR FAR too much evidence for the existing theory, and none for the ideas proposed in this thread.

The electron does exist but it is misnamed. It is really a south pole magnetic unit. Atom smashers are giving photos of particles. They can tell mass and charge accurately. Electron microscopes work. Electronics and circuity work. It is not the devices invented that have the problem. It is the theory to explain what is actually happening that has contradictions in it. If it has contradictions it means something is wrong with it.

The theory to explain it, should be changed to magnetism, not electric charge. This would eventually lead to further progess without contradictions. And also, levitating things on the earth's magnetic field like Leedskalnin did and the Pyramid builders probably did.

When the theory is completely right it will make predictions that can be proven that you will not have if the theory is flawed.

May 23, 2009

Moved to pseudoscience.

Reality doesn't care what you believe. Reality is what it is -- and as far as we can tell, Einstein is right. Space and time are not nearly as simple as you would like them to be. There is overwhelming evidence in favor of relativity.

If Einstein's theories are wrong (and they probably are at some level), whatever comes along to replace them must still display things like time dilation and length contraction because those phenomena are very real.

General relativity, the theory dealing with space/time and gravity was proven to be correct experimentally. Based on his mathematics it was predicted that light passing close to the sun would be bent by gravity to a certain angle. During a solar eclipse, a star's position change as its light passed close to the sun was shown to prove the theory true.

Special relativity, the theory dealing with time and length contraction is based on the assumption that the speed of light is constant in all reference frames. It is light being a constant that forces the length and time contraction. If the speed of light is not really a constant, then those contractions will not happen and the speed of light is not a barrier.

It was the michelson-morley experiment that was supposed to prove the speed of light to be a constant.

I have read on forums at times that light speed has been found to vary. I also believe the red shift in light from stars moving away from us proves the speed of light has slowed down in reaching us, and it is not a constant in all reference frames.

I also think the michelson morley experiment was not accurate enough when it was done to establish light speed to be a constant.

So I don't believe the length and time contractions to be true and I don't think the speed of light is a barrier.

[Depending on what you accept as evidence: UFOs coming to earth from outer space must be traveling faster then the speed of light. The aliens told Betty Hill in the Barney and Betty Hill incident that they had trading routes between stars, which require faster than light speed to do that.-- That is depending on what you accept as evidence.]

E=Mc2, was calculated from special relativity assuming the speed of light to be constant. The equation shows large energy release from a small ammount of mass, justifying the search for an atomic bomb, during WW2. But, the equation is still approximately true if light speed is not a constant, so that does not change anything.

May 23, 2009

Wait, so if science is hard, I can just substitute vague assertions and anecdotes?

Wow, that'll make my thesis go a LOT faster!

Take 2 books on The Scientific Method and call us when you understand it.

Go to the longevity section of about.com. It has articles and references to peer reviewed articles where they got the research from.

Here is some of it.

Question: How do Antioxidants Slow Aging?

Answer: Antioxidants neutralize free radicals, which damage cells, clog arteries and contribute to chronic illness and aging. Antioxidants are found in leafy vegetables, fruits, wine, and chocolate. Antioxidants can also be found in certain vitamins and minerals such as vitamins A, C and E, zinc and selenium.

I use the supplements in that article, along with calcium, which is necessary for bones and teeth.

But, I use certain of them in very high doses.

http://longevity.about.com/od/researchandmedicine/p/age_radicals.htm

Free radicals are a byproduct of normal cell function. When cells create energy, they also produce unstable oxygen molecules. These molecules, called free radicals, have a free electron. This electron makes the molecule highly unstable. The free radical bonds to other molecules in the body - causing proteins and other essential molecules to not function as they should. Luckily, antioxidants can minimize free radical damage.

Antioxidants - the Free Radical Sponge:

Antioxidants are substances found in plants that soak up free radicals like sponges. If your body has plenty of antioxidants available, it can minimize the damage caused by free radicals. Get your antioxidants from eating plants. There is some evidence that we can only get the full antioxidant benefits from eating real plants and other foods. Supplements appear not to be as effective.

I disagree with the last sentence of that article. I have found supplements to be more effective because they allow for much larger doses to be taken.

However, natural vitamin C, which is sold with rose hips, has chemicals in the rose hips that make them much more potent. Purely synthetic vitamin C, with no rose hips, is much less potent. So, you see the chemicals in the rose hips add excipients that cause the full benefit. So, there is a small amount of truth in the last sentence of that article.

http://longevity.about.com/od/researchandmedicine/p/age_radicals.htm

How Free Radicals Cause Aging:

This theory asserts that many of the changes that occur as our bodies age are caused by free radicals. Damage to DNA, protein cross-linking and other changes have been attributed to free radicals. Over time, this damage accumulates and causes us to experience aging.

The Evidence:

There is some evidence. Studies have shown that increasing the amount of antioxidants in the diets of mice and other animals can slow the effects of aging. This theory does not fully explain all the changes that occur during aging. It is likely that free radicals are only one part in the aging

I have read a theory in a nutrition book that free radical damage can account for all of the effects of aging.

Books I used to formulate my experiment are books in the Good Health Guide Series. Vitamin C updated, The Disease of Aging, and The antioxidants. You can get on Google and find those books.

I was taking 9 supplements in combination to fight aging and high doses of 2 of them. The duration of my first attempt to slow aging was 19 years at lower doses, to get an idea of what was going on. I was about 26 at the chronological age of 40. The duration of the attempt to reverse aging at higher doses lasted for 17 years [During that time I did not need to work for 3 periods of time, 11 months, a year and 5 months, and five months] I got about 10 or 11 hours sleep per day during those three periods trying to force more growth harmone. [Even if I stayed awake I would stay there trying to sleep to fulfill the time.] Most growth harmone is produced in sleep.

My method don't show results against aging for almost 3 years and then it is only a little bit. But, as time goes by it accelerates. Cells divide, 2, 4, 8 16 32 -- many more divisions in each succeeding generation so you get rapid acceleration as time goes by.

May 23, 2009

Acne rosacea, often called adult acne, is a facial condition that is different from teenage pimple acne. Rosacea causes the face to get permanently red in the center portion of the face and nose. It starts with on a off blushing red, and then as it gets worse the face stays red. It itches and can cause skin flaking. I read that it is a little understood condition.

Well, I think I understand it, what causes it and what can cure it. I had Rosacea and was forced to devise my own cure because the condition was supposed to be incurable.

I will just tell you. If you don't have enough regular bowel movements over a long period of time [months] the blushing red face of rosacea will come on you. If you have rosacea already, then start increasing the amount of fiber in your diet, and have more frequent regular bowel movements [for months] and the condition will heal itself. Depending on how bad your condition is, it will determine how many months to heal it.

I made my own observations of what was happening to my face. If you eat, more blood comes up into the upper body, while the stomach is digesting, causing a temporary worse blushing. A few hours after you have a bowel movement, I noticed the blushing to get less red, as more blood was needed in the lower part of the body to process food in the intestines. If you don't have frequent enough bowel movements then the blood won't go into the lower body often enough. This causes more blood to be in the face more often and it stretches the blood vessels of the face, so that they can hold more blood. Holding too much blood, because they are stretched, the blood vessels of the face will cause the face to blush permanently red. The skin cells must divide around stretched blood capillaries. This causes the dead skin when it reaches the surface to have small holes in it. This causes localized infections and red bumps. This will heal and the localized redness go away, but the skin is not proper and won't come off right. It will form flakes of skin, that itch causing more redness.

The cure for all of these rosacea symptoms is to shrink the blood vessels of the face back to normal size. This is done by having more fiber in the diet which increases the frequency of bowel movements. More frequent bowel movements will cause more blood to be in the lower part of your body around the intestines and this will pull the excess blood out of your face. Keep up the frequent bowel movements for a long period of time {for months} and the blood vessels of the face return to normal size and this cures the rosacea.

I healed my rosacea totally. That lasted for years. I got into a bad diet again and got constipated too often and the rosacea came back. I increased my fiber, had more regular bowel movements and healed the rosacea again. I know that this is the real cure for acne rosacea.

Psyllium seed husks is a great fiber substitute as is prune juice. Cascara Sagrada, a natural herb laxative can also be useful.

May 23, 2009

Yep, no other person in the history of mankind has ever signed a sworn affidavit and been wrong or lying. Not ever.

And, we all now Leonard Nimoy -- Spock -- is the definitive scientific authority. Unsolved Mysteries was just the icing on that cake.

If it is so easy to have solved, why can't you answer any of the direct questions posted above? Why can't you reproduce it in an obviously unbiased and objective way?

Maybe more to the point, why aren't you fabulously wealthy yet? Because the ability to move large amount of matter with such ease -- even if limited to just night time -- would be an exceptionally valuable service that many people would pay a great deal of money for. So, why are you wasting your time posting on a rinky-dinky Internet forum? Get out, make a fortune, then you can pay scientists to replicate all your experiments and validate your theories and sit around telling us how right you were.

I am working 40 hours per week and trying to get more than 8 hours sleep per day. I don't have too much time to spend in cyberspace. Don't have the time. I was heavily involved in science in my younger years. I am not now. I examined Leedskalnin's ideas in 2000, when I had lots of time. Just out of curiosity. I just did that experiment to demonstrate to myself how he could do that. Science is not my main conscern right now.

I posted that mainly to show you scientists that there is another theory out there about electric current and magnetism that challenges accepted science. Also to remind that there are contradictions in electromagnetic theory; they can be found on the internet. And, Leedskalnin's challenge to science is a serious one. 2 million pounds of unexplained coral stone prove that. I will probably leave this forum soon and go to other forums.

Getting wealthy is not my main conscern nor is science.

Get Leedskalnin's book, Magnetic Current and see the experiments for yourself.

He really was eccentric. He died of malnutrition. He had 3000 dollars cash adjusted for inflation it would be about 40,000 now. And he was so absorbed in what he was doing he neglected to buy enough food to live. He checked into a hospital and he was too far gone to save. He could not hide any of his equipment. He died and scientists went out there and they could not solve the mystery of how he moved those heavy stones. --because their ideas about electricity and magnetism could not even consider the possibility of floating stones on the earth's magnetic field.

The electron never should have been invented to try to explain what comes off the cathode in a cathode ray. It is a magnetic flow of south pole magnets like Leedskalnin said. Electromagnetic theory has + and - charge (repelling and attracting in place of what it really is, north and south pole magnets, (repelling and attracting). So, current theory will still be right in many instances and have contraditions [especially mathematical contradictions] in other instances. I think the world will end before it is corrected.

May 20, 2009

Since you said it was a clothesline pole I’ll take a wild guess and say it was to tie off to secure the end of the clothesline.

And then you stated: “Clip fit easily…”

You stated in post #6 explaining your experiment: “Car battery charger rated at 20 amps”.

I asked in post #19: “Was there some indication on the ammeter of the battery charger to tell you how much current was going through the circuit?”.

You replied in post # 20: “I hooked the positive aligator clamp from the charger on the pole because of Leedskalnin's description of current”.

Side Note: They don’t use alligator clamps (more accurately – clips) on battery chargers.

You then said: “It pushed 20 amps through the clamps, but I don't know how many amps actually flowed over the wet pavement”.

I then asked in post #26: “How can you conduct 20 amps through the circuit you described?

And you replied: “20 amps comes out if you have it connected to a car battery”.

Since an automotive battery doesn’t come with an ammeter, may I dare ask, how did you know this? It doesn’t make any difference what the power source is, what determines the amount of current flowing in the circuit is the resistance and the applied voltage. Since battery chargers have an output voltage higher than an automotive battery, it stands to reason more current would flow through the circuit using a battery charger. Since the battery charger is rated at 20 amps, it should have no problem sustaining this amount of current (if not a little more) before some circuit protection kicks in.

There is no such thing as a “concreted brick”. You described a concrete building block which is quite porous because it contains entrapped and entrained air. You did use the word “soak”. When in doubt go to Google and in the box, type in- define:soak. It doesn’t mean to moisten. Maybe your bathroom scale only has two readings – 13 and 15 pounds. If water were that conductive then automotive batteries would quickly discharge from fog, mist, rain, snow, ocean spray, road salt, etc. There are many connections in automobiles, trucks, tractors, bulldozers, etc., that are not well protected like the battery, alternator and starter connections. In the real world automotive storage batteries don’t magically discharge due to north pole magnets committing suicide and automotive electrical circuits don’t develop low resistance shorts under adverse conditions.

In other words, your posts are full of nonsense.

For the rest of you that may be interested in the Leedskalnin fantasy, you can find it here:

http://keelynet.com/unclass/magcurnt.txt

http://keelynet.com/unclass/magcur2.txt

http://keelynet.com/unclass/magcur3.txt

What Leedskalnin did is no fantasy. There is a 28 ton stone sitting in Florida, with other stones weighing much over 10 tons, used to build his coral castle. The lifting equipment he had, --the best of it was a tripod of poles and pullies that could only handle 10 tons, and just lift it and not move it.

You tell me how he lifted and moved and set into position, a 28 ton stone with that equipment.

People spying on him did sign sworn affidavits that they saw large coral stones floating in the air. --that is a fact.

Leedskalnin was featured on Unsolved mysteries, with Robert Stack and In search of with Leonard Nimoy. It is a scientific mystery how he put those stones there.

It was a mystery till I solved it, anyway.

May 18, 2009

The Earths magnetic field will not lift a sewing needle, it will not lift a 150 pound magnet or a 150 ton magnet no matter how strongly magnetized it is. Your idea of magnetic fields is not connected with reality. The Earth's magnetic field is very weak, compared to it's gravity. I see no way possible to use the Earths magnetic field to levitate huge stones.

Based on your idea of what a magnetic field is, you think it couldn't be done. Physics calls a magnetic field a region of space that acts on magnetic material or something like that.

Based on Leedskalnin's definition of a magnetic field it could be done. Here is why.

This is what Leedskalnin calls a magnetic field:

Just like

physics considers an electron or proton to be the smallest unit of electric

charge, there is a smallest unit of magnetism which he calls north and south

pole individual magnets. They are free to flow in metals, in the air and in

other things. The iron shavings around a bar magnet trace their path. From

the North end of a magnet, there are many north pole magnets flowing out and

going around the outside of the magnet and coming into the south pole of the

magnet and then running in the metal and returning to the North pole. From

the South pole of the magnet, there are many south pole magnets flowing out

and going around the outside of the magnet and going into the North pole and

flowing through the metal and returing to the South pole. Some flow straight

out from the poles and don't return, but are replaced by others from the

air.

The Earth acting like a big magnet has these magnetic particles flowing around it like that. The North magnetic pole of the earth is the same polarity as the south pole of a compas. --south seeking pole of a compas. In the northern hemisphere south pole magnetic units are flowing upward from the earth. They extend as far down as close to the earth's core, some 4000 miles of them; south pole magnetic units flowing upward.

According to him a negative charge on something is the same as making it a south magnetic monopole. If you put a south magnetic pole on a stone, it is going to have south pole magnets coming out from it in all directions. At the bottom of the stone they are going to be repelled by the south magnetic pole magnets coming upward from the earth. So, there will be a place below the stone where the magnetic units flowing down from the stone will cancel the magnetic units coming up from the earth and the two opposing forces will cancel each other. This will put an upward push on the stone. Increase the magnetic field on the stone and the place where the forces cancel each other will move lower into the earth as more of the magnets coming up are cancelled and it will put a larger upward push on the stone. As the magnetism on the stone is increased a greater and greater upward push will be put on the stone as more and more of the magnets flowing up from the earth are canceled and the place where they cancel each other moves lower and lower into the earth. This can go on for a distance of roughly 4000 miles below the surface of the earth, roughly the radius of the earth. A time will come when the upward push will lift the stone.

By his definition of magnetism and the earth's magnetic field, you could probably lift the rock of Gibralta, if you could put enough of a south magnetic pole on it.

The biggest stone he lifted was about 28 tons. --no problem

The biggest stones in the great pyramid, ---no problem

And by your definition of magnetism you say the earth's magnetic field won't lift a needle.

I think Leedskalnin is correct and those 2 million pounds of heavy stones sitting in Florida prove that.

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

A fireplace chimney is magnetic but it doesn’t levitate.

Car axles turn too slow because of gear reduction in the transmission and differential. Leadskalnin probably used the PTO (power takeoff) from the forklift he used to load the coral stones to power his generator.

I’m still trying to figure out the following:

1. How do you attach a 20 amp battery clip, which has a maximum jaw spread of one inch, to a six inch diameter pole?

2. How do you take a fifteen pound concrete block and soak it with water and still have it weigh fifteen pounds?

3. How can you conduct 20 amps through the circuit you described? The bathroom scale has several layers of insulation. The top of the scale has a non-slip mat which is an insulator. The is applied to the scale with some adhesive (another insulator). And the top of the scale is also insulated because it is painted. The bottom of the scale has little ‘feet’ to prevent scratching the floor and those are also insulators.

The pole had a metal ring connected to it. Don't know what it was for. Clip fit easily.

A concreted brick does not soak up water like a terry cloth towel. The amount of water on it is just on the surface and does not weigh enough to move the needle on a bathroom scale.

20 amps comes out if you have it connected to a car battery. I have no idea how much current actually survived the conductive surface I set up with the soaked concrete. All bathroom scales are not the same. I think I may have soaked the scale also.--I used water to increase the conductivity.

I really think the cold dry air that night helped with conductivity.

May 17, 2009

By supplying mathematical concepts and detailing the experiment you've done. You can, alternatively, supply peer review evidence that state the above, if you can find it. Remember, though, that it needs to be peer reviewed to be accepted.

Easy enough even if you don't have a scanner, a cell phone or a digital camera.

No.

No no. That's not the way science works.

Science works by repeating the tests and checking if the measurements were accurate. And by reviewing the work of others, attempting to see what went wrong (the entire purpose of peer review). Scientists don't live next to one another - it's enough they publish the methodology of their experiments and the final results to make other scientists in places all over the world repeat those experiments and validate those results.

There might be a fundamental error in your experiment that is hard to spot, and that is giving your flawed results. That's why experiments are DUPLICATED ELSEWHERE but Third Party scientists.

You're just not supplying what you're supposed to: actual *scientific* reference and experiment methodology. How can this experiment of yours be repeated? If it can't, then it's not a scientific concept, it's a fluke.

As you were repeatedly told in this forum, there are a million reasons other than your theory for the "results" you report, even if we do believe them. No one challenged the RESULTS you posted. People challenged your conclusion. You need to show the conclusion is ABSOLUTELY a result of the method of your theory rather than all the alternatives people suggested. If you can't, then that's that.

And if it can, you need to show it.

~moo

OK. Get some people to do something similar and see if it is repeatable. You need to wait maybe 10 years to see if it is really working. You would get some results in 3 years, but not enough to prove anything.

Do you see the difficulty with repeatability of this kind of an experiment????

I have been trying hard to reverse aging for 17 years. My age stayed around my early 20s for maybe 14 of those years. In the last 3 years I have seen reversal.

There are websites and nutritional books about fighting aging and slowing it down with nutrition. There are many sites on the internet. Proving that aging can be slowed down with vitamins was done in the 1970s, and the theory behind it, "free radicals" goes back to the 1950s. I am not the only one doing this sort of thing. People are slowing aging with vitamins all over the world. What I am saying is I acheived reversal evidenced mostly in the last 2.5 years. Large doses of growth harmone were shown to reverse aging but accumulated side effects forced the experiment to stop. Giantism or acromagalee can be caused by too much growth harmone.

May 17, 2009

Everything you say is moot without evidence, antiaging, seeing as your claim is scientific based, your evidence need be scientific based too.

Claiming prosecution does not negate your obligation to supply proof for your claim.

I have no scanner, cell phone or digital camera. Pictures can be faked anyway. I thought about this already; how can I prove this to an internet forum?

The only real way I see is to meet with someone that uses this forum in my city, and he can report if I am really young or not. I can do a fast 100 yard dash if he likes; ordinary 57 year olds cannot do that fast. I can show him my driver's licence and birth certificate copy to show I was born in 1952.

I live in New Orleans Louisiana. If someone using this forum is willing to meet with me anywhere in this area, then I can prove it to him in person. He can tell you if I am physically as young as I say. If you really want to pursue this idea of proof we can do it that way. Get someone on this forum to post a message that he will meet with me in the New Orleans area and check out my age. I don't really see any other way of proving it on the internet.

May 17, 2009

The Earths magnetic field will not lift a sewing needle, it will not lift a 150 pound magnet or a 150 ton magnet no matter how strongly magnetized it is. Your idea of magnetic fields is not connected with reality. The Earth's magnetic field is very weak, compared to it's gravity. I see no way possible to use the Earths magnetic field to levitate huge stones.

Well here is a simple little experiment you can do to see if my idea of magnetic fields is connected with reality. Get two magnets of equal strength and put north pole to north pole. Feel the strength of the magnetic repulsion between the two. Now get a stronger magnet, and hold that on the left, and put them north pole to north pole. See if the repulsion between the two increases because the magnet on the left is now stronger than the one on the right. Get a stronger magnet still and put in on the left and put them north pole to north pole. See if the repulsion between the two increased further because the one on the left is now a stronger magnet still.

If increasing the strength of only one of the magnets will increase the repulsion between the two, then my idea should be correct. Increasing the strengh of the magnetic field on the stone should increase the repulsion force between it and the earth's magnetic field. Increase the repulsion force enough and the stone will lift. --Because of how strong the magnetic field is on the stone.

If the earth's magnetic field in this situation is as weak as you say, then how come the brick I charged up lost two pounds in weight? I am like Leedskalnin. I let the experiment show me what to believe.

May 17, 2009

Perhaps you could post some more specific details of what vitamins and dosages these megadoses involve, so that posters will have an idea why your approach apparently has different results from most other vitamin users? (I'm assuming you aren't averse to this, as otherwise you wouldn't have posted on a forum in the first place, and if you are already being "checked out" by government doctors and scientists then you've likely already done that.)

I ask because you surely can't mean just straight multivitamin pills, but rather a very concentrated diet targeting specific vitamins and nutrients. But there must be some element of multivitamins or you wouldn't have brought it up, and as at least one study (with N = 232606, anyway) claims a link between some multivitamins and increased mortality, I'm curious if you mean there is a different way to use them.

Fighting aging is about increased cell divisions. vitamins and calcium, sleep and protein promote cell divisions. A high protein diet needs fiber supplementation. Try psyllium seed husks. Do a colon cleanse about twice per year and try to keep the colon clean using fiber.

If I gave dosages and someone tried what I said and got sick or died, then I could be resposible before the law for hurting that person and maybe charged with a crime.

A, C, E, calcium, stresstabs, selenium, magnesium, zinc, biotin, -all fight aging. Too much A or D can kill you. C has side effects at large levels.

I megadose on C and E. [Read about megadosing before doing it. Look it up in nutrition books or internet. I am not telling you dosages. I don't want any legal trouble. You decide that for yourself at your own risk. Avoid side effects as they come up. Stop taking the vitamins for awhile. Sleep as much as you can. 8 hours per day minimum. make up for lost time on the weekends. Use technique for healing an ulcer to keep stomach in top shape. baking soda in milk for acid stomach.

If you start this now, you would get healthier and have more energy and higher resistance to disease, in a few days; spend roughly 800 bucks a year on vitamins. rough estimate. more or less You won't see any change in aging for about 3 years. It would start out slow and increase its effects.

What is happening to me now is because of what I did years ago.

I have been megadosing for 36 years. the last 17 years at very high levels trying to reverse aging. It has worked.

I took risks. Had to deal with side effects. Very restricted diet to keep stomach in top shape. The stomach bears the brunt of this.

May 17, 2009

If your story is true, then i would think that you would be relatively famous, or on the news of some sort, though i may be wrong. Who have you seen exactly?

Im not stating disbelief in your words, I am simply speculative due to the nature of your descriptions. If this is true, then i suggest that you try to contact a news of some sort in your town and tell them your story, I am sure that someone would be interested. I am.

Are you on any websites? Interviews? Any other form of relative validity in your statements?

My town in New Orleans LA. It is a roman catholic controlled city. They control the news. I am a protestant that posts against the roman catholic church often. They know me already. Don't expect the news in this country to favor me no matter what I accomplish. Believe what you will.

Based on what I have read and what I have seen personally, the news in this country is controlled by the Roman catholic church. We don't have a free press. If we did, your post would be meaningful; I should be on the news already. The AMA also discourages vitamin megadosing. They don't make money off vitamins. They are money oriented. They favor expensive drugs and expensive hospital machines that they can make money off of.

Look up vatican spy network --the vatican papers on google.

May 17, 2009

In several scientific disciplines that involve mathematics an imaginary number is used in the calculations to make the numbers come out right. That should mean that there really is something acting on the physical world that is represented by that imaginary number, since it makes the math come out correctly in real world calculations.

An example of this is voltage = current x impedance

The number used for impedance is a complex number composed of a real number plus an imaginary number.

V=I*(R+J) voltage =current times impedance J is an imaginary number to make the math come out right.

Current is plotted horizontally on a graph and an imaginary vertical axis is used for j; a2 +b2 = c2 pythagorean theorem is used to calculate a value for the current. Showing that the imaginary number represents another dimension acting on the current. This imaginary axis, for the imaginary number, on the graph, is at a right angle to the real axis for the current. So the imaginary number is acting, mathematically, as another dimension.

Einstein's general relativity theory, to explain gravity, (which has been proven experimentally correct) uses time as a 4th dimension. In the real world the 3 dimensions, length, width, and depth are each one at a right angle to the other two dimensions. Time, being a 4th dimension, should be at a right angle to the 3 physical dimensions, to qualify as a 4th dimension. The imaginary number, used in calculating current and other things, has an imaginary axis on a graph that is at a right angle to the real axis, and it is therfore acting as a 4th dimension. Since the only proven 4th dimension is time:

I recommend that time should be substituted for the imaginary number in all calculations, in scientific disciplines, that use an imaginary number to make the math come out correctly.

This could lead to all sorts of new equations in all of these fields, and show how time itself is entering into the function of the real world in these scientific disciplines.

copyrighted/plagiarized material removed

Investigating the equation v = i x (r + j)

v = voltage or potential difference (charge difference); i = current, r = resistance, J = imaginary number

Well let's do the substitution and see:

v = i x (r + j) substituting t (time) for j (the imaginary number)

v = i x (r+t); substituting i for charge/time [coulombs/time]

v = charge/t x (r + t); v = charge/t x r + charge/t x t; t's cancel

v = i x r + charge. For alternating current.

That equation that I derived from substituting j with t makes sense after considering it.

v = i x r + charge [substitution was made for i = charge/time (or coulombs/t)

That equation makes sense for alternating current.

Current goes from max to 0 then back to max in the opposite direction and then to 0. When the current is at 0 and ready to change direction the charge (built up at both ends of the wire) is at a maximum, so the potential difference has reversed and ready to push the current back in the opposite direction. So, the value of the voltage (potential difference stays constant) throughout the cycle. As I x r increases the charge moves away from the ends of the wire, in current, and charge at ends of wire goes down while current goes up, still keeping voltage value v, constant. That equation does describe what is happening with alternating current. The substitution of j for time worked.

Also, v - (i x r) = charge is valid. When v = i x r then the charge built up at the end of the wires is 0. V = i x r in direct current, and with direct current there is never a charge built up at the end of the wire because the charge is flowing constanly in one direction through the wire.

This is easy to do as you see. Go to any scientific discipline that uses an imaginary number (as another dimension) to make the math come out correctly and substitute t (time) for the imaginary number and then derive your own equations. My argument for why this is a valid substitution is in the post up top.

You could be the first man to see a new mathematical relationship in nature.

May 17, 2009

I really have to say here that the Earths magnetic field is too weak to levitate a sewing needle much less a chuck of coral stone weighing several tons. If indeed this guy levitated these huge stones it was not by using the Earths magnetic field........

I really have to say here that you must not understand the situation.

A sewing needle, magnetized, as much as you can, will have the south pole hanging upward as the earth's magnetic field pushes up on it, if you hang it from a thread in the middle. The more metal you have, the stronger the magnet can be made. Suppose you made the needle to be 20 feet long and weigh 150 pounds, and you magnetized it as much as you could. The magnetic field around the needle would be much stronger because you have much more metal. Hang that in the middle by a strong rope, and the south end is going to still be pushed upward; it will hang with the same angle upward as the small needle. The difference is, it now takes much more force to make it hang slanted and much more force to make it hang level against the upward push on the south end. How much force the magnetic field can exert is going to depend on how strong the magnet is. The earth's magnetic field will lift a strong magnet even weighing tons, if it is magnetized strong enough. Leedskalnin designed his own powerful direct current generator; I think he powered it with a strap to the axle of a car. It pushed a lot of amps.

You think the earth's magnetic field is not strong. It is extensive, very large, that makes it strong. The Nasa tether experiment hung a conductor tether 12 miles long from the space shuttle. It traveled through the earth's magnetic field as the shuttle orbited. The magnetic field of the earth is much weaker way up there. It generated enough electric current, traveling through the earth's weaker magnetic field to provide enough electrical power to run the space shuttle.

May 16, 2009

I assume what you mean by a “cement brick” is really a concrete brick or block. I’m having trouble visualizing this setup. There must be some reason why a T pole is embedded into the concrete pavement in the first place. Could you tell me what the diameter of the pole is? Does the “cement brick” weigh 15 pounds before or after it has been soaked? If before, then how much did it weigh after it was soaked? Did you dry the brick and then weigh it after the experiment? Or was it still soaking wet? Or did the scale just say – 13 pounds? Was there some indication on the ammeter of the battery charger to tell you how much current was going through the circuit? How did you hook the alligator clamp of the battery charger to the “cement brick”? How old was the battery charger at the time of the experiment? Did the battery charger have a non-polarized AC plug or a newer style polarized plug, or a grounded plug? Do you know what the voltage is of the battery charger?

Answering these questions will give me a better idea of how this experiment was conducted.

I had alot of spare time in the year 2000. I got Leedskalnin's books to see if I could determine what he did. Proper scientific method is --start with the experiment and the experiment shows you what the theory is. [False scientific method is ---start with a theory then find an experiment to prove it.] Leedskalnin was using proper scientific method in his books. His ideas came from experiments first. He was testing current using compass needles. What the needles showed him, that is what he believed.

Leedskalnin describes electric current as north pole magnetic units flowing from the positive terminal of the battery with a corkscrew right hand twist in the flow, and an equal and opposite flow of south pole magnetic units flowing from the negative terminal of the battery with a corkscrew right hand twist n the flow.

The pole was a clothesline pole for drying clothes; it would have wires hooked on it. It was about 6 inches in dieameter, 7 ft. high with two poles coming from the center pole like a T shape. I hooked the positive aligator clamp from the charger on the pole because of Leedskalnin's description of current. I was trying to put a negative charge on the brick. I reasoned that I must run positive charge off in another direction to do that. So I connected the positive clamp to the pole, to run positive charge into the pole. The negative clamp was connected to a top corner of the brick. The brick was a standard H shaped cement block, brick. I put the brick on the scale to observe weight. Dry cement is not a good conductor so I soaked the brick with water and the cement ground from the pole to the scale with water and maybe the bathroom scale got soaked to. The weight of the water has no effect on the scale. Current ran from the positive clamp, into pole, down pole across wet concrete floor and up through scale to bottom of brick and through brick to negative clamp.

Done on a cold dark night with a flashlight. Coldness probably helped greatly as wet pavement is not a good conductor. Coldness reduces resistance a lot. Amps is what is important as you are trying to build up charge. It pushed 20 amps through the clamps, but I don't know how many amps actually flowed over the wet pavement.

The brick weighed 15 pounds. Tested--still weighed 15 pounds. I turned on the current for about 10 minutes. Picked brick up off scale; I think I put in down quickly on dry pavement; took the negative clamp off and put it back on the scale. It weighed 13 pounds. Science reqires repeatability in experimenst. So I did it again. It weighed 13 pounds again after being disconnected and put back on the scale.

I did that to satisfy my curiosity as to how Leedskalnin could levitate stones using electricity. I have no reason to doubt the signed affidavits of people that said they saw stones floating in the air because there is about 2 million pounds of heavy coral stone sitting there in Florida and science does not know how it got there.

Since negative charge is what Leedskalnin described as filling it up with south magnetic pole units, then a negatively charged brick should be a south magnetic monopole. The Earth's magnetic field pushes upward on the south pole end of a compass needle in the northern hemisphere. So the negativiely charged brick should have gotten lighter because of being pushed upward by the Earth's magnetic field, if Leedskalnin was right about charge really being magnetic. My experiment showed to me he is right.

You could play around with this and come up with a better setup to push many more amps and get a greater charge on the brick. That would make it lighter still and maybe even float.

Try positive clamp to one brick. Negative clamp to another brick, and a battery jumper cable connecting the two bricks. The negative clamped brick on a scale and sitting on an insulator on top the scale. Disconnect by taking the jumper cable off of the negative clamped brick. It is important how you disonnect because you don't want the charge to run off of the negatively charged brick. It should not want to run back into the direction of the negative clamp when you take off the jumper cable. You could play around with it if you want to. I don't have any interest right now in doing that. I am working now and have other things to do.

Hey, make a brick float on the Earth's magnetic field at night and get the news media out there to film it. You should be famous shortly as a notable scientist.

As for me, I just wanted to satisfy my curiousity as to how he did that. I have satisfied it.

May 14, 2009

I don't understand this experiment.

People spying on Leedskalnin with binoculars signed sworn affidavits that they saw coral stones weighing tons floating in the air. Leedskalnin seemed to have electricity to make that happen. I was trying to reproduce what he did, using the welding rod experiment as a model for that. The only thing is his books that gave an upward push was the magnetic declination of compas needles. A compas needle [or long magnet hung by a string] would have the south pole end pushed upward by the earth's magnetic field in the northern hemiphere. Get a needle compass and see that the south pole end is upward a little bit.

According to Leedskalnin, putting a negative charge on something is really the same as filling it up with south magnetic pole units. So putting a negative charge on something should turn it into a south magnetic monopole. My experiment was trying to put a negative charge on the cement brick and see if the Earth's magnetic field would push up on it, and make it lighter. [it had to be done in the dark because light photons will knock electrons [whic Leedskalnin calls south pole magnets] off of the brick and so light would interfere with the experiment. I tried to disconnect it the using the way that he disconnected the welding rods as a model.

Leedskalnin worked with coral stones. I once had a coral stone and it was filled with many little cavities. This should incresed the surface area of the stone greatly, so coral stones could probably hold much more electric charge than a cement birck.

Leedskalnin claimed he knew how the Egyptians built the pyramids. It is interesting that many small ceramic jars were found near pyramids, in Egypt, which had two compartments. They were set up in such a way that if a mild acid like vinegar were put in them, they would be an electric battery producing electricity. Many of these connected together could produce some sizeable electric current. So did the Egyptians use Leedskalnin's method to build the pyramids. I don't know.

There is an egyptian writing saying the great pyramid was built in 20 years by a certain pharoah, but this must be a lie. It would take one stone set every two minutes to do that in 20 years.

Then there is this statement from antiquity that I read in a book.

"true it was, that the priests of On levitated the great stones, and they flew through the air about the distance of a bow shot"

Now, I don't know how true that was, but it is interesting to me that there is such a statement in view of what Leedskalnin did.

May 12, 2009

I have a hard time reconciling this statement with the claim that you have a degree in physics. Surely someone who has a degree in physics has learned that electrostatics and magnetics are related in Maxwell's equations and through relativity.

Related by motion maybe. Move the charge and you get a magnetic field circuling it. Paper hanging from a comb with electrostatic charge is stationary. Where is the magnetic force, if the charge is stationary? Do you really expect paper to be pulled toward a magnet. I saw it happen with my own eyes. I brought the magnet near slowly. Paper is an insulator, no current should have been induced in it. So why did it move toward the magnet?

I posted this explanation of electricity on a pay for forum years ago. One guy said, If it were all reduced to magnetism then maxwell's equations would have more symmetry. He said he always suspected something to be wrong with electromagnetic theory. I looked on the internet for contradictions in electromagnetic theory. I found a whole page full of mathematical contradictions in electromagnetic theory. Get on google and enter contradictions in electromagnetic theory or words similar to that. It is not hard to find. Mutually exclusive explanations for light. Photon particles versus transverse waves. ---that is a glaring example of contradiction.

Like I said in the OP; electromagnetic theory is going to have contradictions in it until it is reduced to just magnetism.

Leedskalnin was not in the scientific click of his day. He had only a small education. He was self educated. His ideas were not accepted against a man like J J Thompson. Leedsakalnin seems to have gotten intellectual revenge for being rejected, however. He put about 2 million pounds of heavy coral stone in Florida, for all to see, and the scientific community cannot explain how it got there. His equipment could not lift and move nearly that much. I had to search his experiments and ideas to find a clue as to what he did. He would not tell anyone how he did it.

May 11, 2009

This is false. They do not freely move through air.

Completely wrong. The key is here is getting the rods hot enough so that the atoms can align to form a magnetic. Simpler and safer to bang rods with a hammer to get the atoms to align. And the magnets so formed are not monopoles as claimed here.

This has to be the dopiest part of this silly post. The correct word is builder. Coral as a building material is common in many parts of the world including East Africa and the tabby buildings of the US Southeast.

You may be correct about that. Looking more closely at the way that he wrote that experiment, he says test the rod ends. I was assuming he was talking about the whole rods. They might not be monopoles. Nevertheless, he has demonstrated that electricity is a flow of magnetic particles.

Look up electricity on the internet, in science books, etc. They still don't know what electricity really is. They tell you about its effects, how it is produced, and then off beat theories which can't be proven about virtual photons and the like. It is not electrons flowing, nor is it protons flowing. They don't know what is flowing.

I may be wrong about the monopoles, but Leedskalnin's experiment does show it to be a flow of magnetic particles. Your idea about the magnets in the rods alligning would only work in the presence of a magnetic field that is parallel to the rods when they get hot or the earth's magnetic field being parallel to the rods when they get hot. Leedskalnin does not say allign the rods with the earth's magnetic field. Evidently it will work no matter what the orientation of the rods. That shows that the cause of the magnetism in the rods is coming from the electric current and not from the allignment of small magnets in the metal with an external magnetic field, like physics books would say. Physics books would say only a coiled current would produce the magnetism. Leedskalnin does not use a coil. Physics would still say that those rods should not turn a compas needle, if the orientation of the rods was not alligned with the earth's magnetic field. Leedskalnin is showing they will turn a compas needle no matter if the rods are oriented parallel to the earth's magnetic field or not.

What you said about banging it with a hammer also requires the rods to be alligned parallel with the Earth's magnetic field.

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

I this is all as easy as you say -- objective unbiased proof should be very, very easy to provide.

So provide it already.

I remember 9 years ago when I read Leedskalnin's ideas and experiments that he said it is all magnetic. He also explained electrostatic force as being magnetic. I remember charging up a plastic comb with electrostatic charge by rubbing it on a blanket or something. Then I moved it close to small pieces of paper. They would be attracted to the comb and stick to it as expected. But when one piece of paper would stick to the comb, and then another piece of paper would stick to that piece of paper---so there was two pieces of paper hanging like a chain, from the comb. If I would bring a small magnet close to the second peice of paper that was hanging, it would be pulled toward the magnet. That is a little experiment you can try to see if electrostatic force is really magnetic. Physics would say the magnet should not pull on those pieces of paper at all. Physics has separated electrostatic force from magnetic force, but Leedskalnin says they are both the same magnetic force.

May 10, 2009

How do you know you wouldn't still be that way without vitamins? My MS advisor never bothered with vitamins, and is still *very* fit and healthy in his mid-fifties (as in "bikes 20 miles a day, resting pulse rate of 40" fit).

You cannot conclude anything based on a single individual.

A valid experiment has more than one replicate, ESPECIALLY in biology, and especially when it's not ammenable to repeated measures analysis. You are reporting an anecdote, nothing more.

In order to conduct a *valid* experiment on megadosing vitamins, you'd need at least 500 people in both the control and experimental groups, and a proper double-blind system. It would be even better to try it on a group of lab rats which are as genetically homogeneous as possible. One individual's experience doesn't even come close to being reliable or informative.

An old man or woman can do great physical activity if trained to do so. I heard of a 93 year old woman that finished marathon races. Jack Lalane can swim great distances in his old age. But he is still an old man. I am a young man. My physical age seems to be about 18. If I shave and do a comb over I look and move like a College freshman. College age and high school age girls showed an interest in me as a possible boy friend when I would ride the bus. I am not saying that I am young just because of what I can do physically. It is also because there are no signs of aging on my face. No crows feet. Full cheeks of muscle. Upturned nose. Young skin; no liver spots. No sagging under chin. And for the past 2 years my face has been getting noticebly younger. Putting on more firm living tissue all over my face.

Your MS advisor probably has the signs of aging on his face. Crows feet wrinkels. Hollowed out cheeks. Down turned longer nose. Bisically it is less living tissue all over the face and the skull starts to show through; that is aging. [Crows feet are the wrinkles that go behind the eyes below the temple.]

What you are saying is correct. You can research slowing down aging with antioxidants or nutritional supplements on the internet. There are many websites about it. There are many people around the world that take antiaging supplements to slow aging. The results are working for many people. I saw on the Discovery channel a lady in her 50s that was still young like in her 30s from taking alot of vitamins. I did not discover this for myself. I read about. I studied books in the good health guide series: the antioxidants, the disease of aging, vitamin C updated. You can find those on google. I used the research and findings of others to formulate my experiment. Slowing down aging with nutrition is working for alot of people worldwide. What I did was to start earlier and push it further than the other people, and make aging start going backwards. My doses were probably higher and I had an effective combination of vitamins to work with. I took risks to do this experiment. There are side effects with magadosing. I made adjustments when I had to. My stomach had to be in top shape to digest all of this. I used techniques to heal an ulcer to keep the stomach in shape. Sleep and a clean colon are also part of it.

May 10, 2009

These two parts do not jive. How does 5% imply complete?

The article talks about C and E from food sources. Food sources only supply a small amount of vitamins C and E. Vitamin C and E supplements, especially in large doses, can supply maybe well over a hundred times what you would get from foods.

[Foods fresh from the fields have lots of vitamins, but nowhere near as much as supplement tablets can provide. Vitamin content goes down with time rapidly. By the time you buy the food at the super market, very little vitamins are left in it.]

So, as you can see, the article talks about the 5% lengthening caused by only small doses of C and E. Megadosing on supplement tablets would provide much more C and E than that. It is the large megadoses that I suspect would protect the telomeres completely. Telomere shortening might be caused by attacks from free redicals.

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

Seconded. You cannot assume the effect is linear, and that if 10 mg improves things by X amount, 100 mg will result in 10X improvement. In fact, such simple, linear relationships are incredibly rare in biology.

I don't have a scanner, cell phone or digital camera. If I posted a picture of myself on the internet, that would not really prove anything. Pictures can be faked on the internet.

So, how do I prove to you that I am still young and vital at 57?

I live in New Orleans, Louisiana. If you really want proof that I am still like a teenager at 57, then get someone that uses this forum, who lives in New Orleans, to meet with me somewhere in New Orleans, and he can report to you if I am still young or not. I can show him my driver's licence that I was born in 1952, my birth certificate, copy. I will do a fast 100 yard dash for him if he likes. [The average 57 year old cannot do that fast.]

I know this is a science forum and scientists value experimental proof. I can provide the proof in person, but not over the internet. I have a BS physics degree and know scientific method. I think I did a valid experiment, to reverse aging over the last 17 years.

May 10, 2009

This is false. They do not freely move through air.

Completely wrong. The key is here is getting the rods hot enough so that the atoms can align to form a magnetic. Simpler and safer to bang rods with a hammer to get the atoms to align. And the magnets so formed are not monopoles as claimed here.

This has to be the dopiest part of this silly post. The correct word is builder. Coral as a building material is common in many parts of the world including East Africa and the tabby buildings of the US Southeast.

The correct Word is inventor. Coral Castle was built of stones weighing as much as 28 tons. Leedskalnin's equipment could only lift, [not move horizontally] about 10 tons maximum. Scientists don't know how he built it. He did everything in secret, and mostly at night. People spying on him with binoculars at a distance, signed sworn affidavits, that they saw stones weighing tons, floating like helium balloons, in the air. That is why Leedskalnin and coral castle was featured on the old TV series, "In Search Of" with Leornard Nimoy, as being a scientific mystery.

I read his books and experimented with what I thought was his method of lifting the stones, with electricity. It is based on his understanding of charge and electricity; not what I was taught in physics. [i have a B. S. Physics degree.] This is what happened:

He also detected South pole magnetic units flowing upward and North pole

magnetic units flowing downward in the northern hemisphere, by hanging a

long magnet in the middle and the south pole end would always hang upward. To

make it level, the south pole end needed to be longer. -- magnetic

declination of compass needles.

My best guess is: He put a strong negative electric charge on them, (at

night to avoid the photo electric effect) and the Earth's magnetic field

pushed up on them and they floated.

According to him, a strong negative charge is really filling it with south

magnetic pole units and the whole stone becomes a south magnetic monopole.

I experimented and made a cement brick weighing 15 pounds, to weigh 13

pounds. Did it twice and never tried it again.

Here:

Cement brick weighing 15 pounds on bathroom scale. Check bathroom scale to

see that it will weigh the same if taken off and put back on the scale.

Car battery charger rated at 20 amps.

Experiment must be done on a dark night, to avoid the photoelectric effect

of light knocking the electrons (south pole magnets as E. L calls them) off

of the cement. I did it on a cold night. The colder temperature might help

keep resistance lower. I used a flashlight; don't point it at the brick. Use

it to see the scale reading. [Leedskalnin did his work at night.]

Experiment done on cement pavement in my back yard.

+ terminal connected to a large metal T shaped pole stuck in the concrete

pavement. (I reasoned that I should channel away plus charge to allow a good

amount of negative charge to get on the brick; so I connected to the pole.

Cement brick is sitting on the scale. Soak the cement brick and cement

pavement (between brick and pole and under scale) with water to help

conductivity of the current.

The negative terminal is connected to the brick on the scale. Battery

charger has clamps. Run the charger for 6 or 7 minutes or longer or shorter

vary it to get results. Run the charger at the highest power it will go if

you have power settings.

This is the important part. How you break the connection. The current is

going from the plus terminal down the pole through cement pavement up

through scale and through brick to the negative clamp that is on the brick.

Break the connection by taking the cement brick off the scale. Turn off

current and take off clamp from brick. Put brick back on scale. Check the

weight and see if it decreased any.

I did this about 9 years ago, and am telling you this from memory.

It must be done at night, to avoid the photo-electric effect knocking off the electrons, (south pole magnets). I did that on a cold dark night. Coldness decreases, resistance.

Note: Leedskalnin got beat up by tough guys. So he moved the whole castle to another area. [about 2 million pounds of heavy coral stones weighing tons.] A guy with a flat bed truck was told to wait around the corner. In a few minutes he heard a loud noise. He ran around the corner. He saw a stone weighing tons in the back of his truck. No lifting equipment was near the truck. This was repeated again and again till the whole 2 million pounds of coral was moved.

I looked at his well documented experiments with compasses, wire and electricity and it looked like basic physics to me. I did the above experiment thinking of electricity and magnetism the way that he thought about it.

May 10, 2009

Telomeres?

Even small doses of vitamins C and E were found to lengthen telomeres. Read the following experiment report. Large megadoses may protect and perserve the length of the telomeres completely.

PMID: 19279081

Quote:

BACKGROUND: Telomere length may be a marker of biological aging. Multivitamin supplements represent a major source of micronutrients, which may affect telomere length by modulating oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine whether multivitamin use is associated with longer telomeres in women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from 586 early participants (age 35-74 y) in the Sister Study. Multivitamin use and nutrient intakes were assessed with a 146-item food-frequency questionnaire, and relative telomere length of leukocyte DNA was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: After age and other potential confounders were adjusted for, multivitamin use was associated with longer telomeres. Compared with nonusers, the relative telomere length of leukocyte DNA was on average 5.1% longer among daily multivitamin users (P for trend = 0.002). In the analysis of micronutrients, higher intakes of vitamins C and E from foods were each associated with longer telomeres, even after adjustment for multivitamin use. Furthermore, intakes of both nutrients were associated with telomere length among women who did not take multivitamins. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first epidemiologic evidence that multivitamin use is associated with longer telomere length among women.

May 10, 2009

What Electricity Is Really Made Of

Theories of Ed Leedskalnin, inventor of coral castle in Florida.

Backed up by experiments. You can buy his books and research his experiments

yourself. They are real elementary physics experiments.

I'll summarize what he found out by experimenting with magnets. Just like