Jump to content

secondtrooper

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by secondtrooper

  1. The balloon analogy is just that, and analogy, and it assumes you are only looking at the surface. It's a two-dimensional representation so you can see an example, because it's harder to envision it in three dimensions.

     

    Does the surface of a balloon have a center?

     

    Ok, but why then use such an example, if it leads me of, as I see, proof?

     

    Holding on to topic. What do you think, looking at 2 stars in 2 different directions from a point, like earth. Would it be possible to measure the speed of those 2 stars using visible spectre.What i meant i draw in paint.

    post-114266-0-69149200-1445526876_thumb.jpg

  2. Hello!


    I had a theory, thats been scraching my brain for quite some time and i didnt know where to write this.

    So, science says, that The Big Bang doesnt have a center, a starting point.

    That it expands from anywhere to everywhere. And this table showed, that it expands constantly from any point, any planet or star if we look at it so.

    A B C

    From A 0 km/s 10,000 km/s 20,000 km/s

    From B -10,000km/s 0 km/s 10,000 km/s


    But doesnt universe expand exponentially? Taking example, that point B is where we stand, and the The Big Bang's starting point is somewhere before point A, the point C would "run" from us faster, than the point A and it would prove, that The Big Bang started from point somewhere before A. Even taking The Famous Balloon Analogy, Universe is multi-dimentional, it can't be a sphere. And if you imagine, that Universe is the air inside the balloon, blowing it up the particles would expand exponentially and there would be a center.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.