Jump to content

JackG

New Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JackG

  1. These musings have been sent to the New Scientist magazine, as well as, a number of eminent scientists over the past year. To date I have received no responses. I was hoping that some one on this forum may feel able to discuss and contribute to this.

     

     

    ****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

     

     

    For the last thirty years I have woken up at night wondering how life began.

    why this should happen I don’t know. As a layman I do not have the knowledge

     

    or information afforded to yourselves, and unable to go any further than my

     

    thoughts. If you could give me some answers I would be most grateful.

     

     

     

    THE BIG BANG THEORY

    ------------------------------

    We are told an explosion in space released chemicals that fell to Earth and

     

    completed its journey in a deep-sea hypothermal vent. Some scientists say

     

    these chemicals formed a soup from which one-cell creatures came into being.

     

    Such an explosion would spread residue from one end of the Earth to the other.

     

    This for me is a problem, falling from different heights weighing various amounts

     

    into a tidal salty sea ending up together, undiluted and uncontaminated.

     

    The odds this coming together must be astronomical, in my humble opinion can

     

    Only be accepted if you believe in miracles. This hypothesis goes further these

     

    one-cell creatures came on land and were responsible for all life. It is hard to

     

    believe those one- cell creatures were so diverse they eventually changed into

     

    millions of different species.

     

    Another aspect to consider, this life created by chemicals cannot be

     

    copied in clinical laborites. What abilities would a one –cell creature have?

     

    compared with a common fly that is multi-cell creature. Lord Kelvin [William

     

    Thomson} Said:

     

    “ I confess to being deeply impressed by the evidence put before us by professor

     

    Huxley, and I am ready to adopt, as an article of scientific faith, true through all

     

    Space and through all time, that life proceeds from life, and from nothing but

     

    life.”

     

    Two such redoubtable minds of their time almost unsurpassed in achievement

     

    say, indirectly, the big bang is not possible.

     

     

     

    ANIMALS, PLANTS AND MAN

    ---------------------------------------

     

    Webster dictionary puts vascular plants, such as ferns, began life 390 million

     

    years ago; Insects, reptiles plus amphibians 230 million years ago, flowering

     

    plants 160 million years ago and birds 100 million hundred years ago life of

     

    man estimated to have begun 70 million years ago. Plants are very interesting

     

    since it could be argued they were the first life. How did plants get to Earth? The

     

    only theory I have heard is that meteorites from another world crashed on this

     

    Planet-exposing seeds trapped inside. To travel millions of light years with the

     

    harmful rays in the cosmos and the longevity of the journey make this theory

     

    unlikely. Ferns and flowering plants were separated by two hundred million

     

    years so it would have to have happened twice If however this feat was managed

     

    it evokes another thought, whatever

     

    time it took to reach Earth, for instance, a million light years, where it came

     

    from would have been at least that amount of time ahead of life on Earth.

     

     

    Darwin wrote his famous theory on evolution, but evidence shows us it might be

     

    true, or might not. If you can imagine millions of one-cell creatures emerging

     

    from the sea, subject to the same environment changed into billions of different

     

    species. Taking this a step further, there would have been thousands of these

     

    creatures that chose exactly the same place to live and became so different as an

     

    Elephant is to a Ant. Man gave many other species millions of years start in their

     

    Evolution and achieved wonders. They built cities, wrote music, great works of

     

    art and most of all complicated languages to communicate. Other species, in

     

    millions of years, have achieved nothing in comparison. We tend to be amazed

     

    when an animal uses a stick or a stone as a tool, we are dumbfounded when

     

    animals are taught to do complicated tricks, it took them millions of years to

     

    reach this state. If it is accepted that man came from apes, then why do these ape

     

    still exist? In 70 millions years they should have all have changed. If the same

     

    species of ape lives today all it says is that environment may or may not change

     

    appearances. In billions of different species it is most likely that many will have

     

    related features. One can surmise man was never an ape but ape like. He would

     

    have been hairy to protect him from the climate but as time elapsed things would

     

    change. Wearing animal skins for protection, discovering fire to keep warm, and

     

    living in caves all of these elements over time would eliminate the need for hair.

     

    This cannot be claimed as environmental change, this is progress.

     

     

     

    GOD AND RELIGION

    ---------------------------

     

     

    If you can believe in God then nothing is impossible. To accept the abilities

     

    attached to such a being creating life would be a simple task. One might ask

     

    one self,” how can there be a God when so many evil people are allowed to

     

    prey on the innocent unhindered? Why are people starving ? Including children

     

    that could hardly be classed as sinners”. These thoughts are further mudded by

     

    religion. Often people are told ”IT IS THE WILL OF GOD” you must not question.

     

    A more intelligent thought might be why is it God’s will? If man never questioned

     

    he would still be living in caves, wearing animal skins and using flints to make

     

    fires. The bible is so contradictory almost impossible to take seriously. Tells of

     

    life beginning with Adam and Eve, does this mean sexual interaction between

     

    brothers sisters, mothers and fathers? We know that medically this is unsound

     

    and hardly likely to produce a healthy race, which by survival to modern times it

     

    must have been. The bible then condemns such sexual interaction between

     

    direct families as a terrible sin and should not be tolerated. How do intellectual

     

    Scientists who are also devout Christians gather their thoughts? The bible says

     

    life began with Adam and Eve yet fossils gathered prove life began millions of

     

    years before. There are so many contradictions in religion too numerous to

     

    comment on, except one, if you truly believe in God religious leaders were meant

     

    to help people and not rule them and certainly not to live in luxury while millions

     

    starve.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.