marcverhaegen
-
Posts
1 -
Joined
-
Last visited
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.
Aquatic ape hypothesis
in Speculations
Posted
Thanks for discussing this. Unfortunately, there are still a lot of misconceptions & unproven assumptions about our semi-aquatic evolution (so-called AAT or AAH) not only by AAT opponents, but also by some proponents.
Our semi-aquatic phase didn’t happen 6 or more mill.yrs ago as Elaine Morgan thought (Hardy even thought >10 Ma), it has nothing to do with apes or australopiths, but it is about archaic Homo during the Ice Ages (Pleistocene 2.5 - 0.01 Ma). Most erectus fossils are typically found amid edible shellfish (marine & freshwater) and show several unmistakable convergences to littoral species: pachyostosis (thick & dense bones), platymeria (flattened femora), platycephaly (long low flat skulls), ear exostoses (as in human divers), orbital rim (eye-protecting), intercontinental dispersal (as when fossil whales became littoral), projecting nostrils etc. Pleistocene Homo did not run over open plains, but simply followed the African & Eurasian coasts & rivers, where they beach-combed, dived & waded bipedally for littoral, shallow aquatic & waterside foods. Our "scars of evolution" (title of one of Elaine's books) show that our ancestors' lifestyle at some time(s) included shallow frequent diving for shellfish, probably this was early-Pleistocene, when they followed the coasts: 1.8-Ma Homo fossils are found as far as Mojokerto on Java (in deltaic sediments, amid shellfish & barnacles), Turkana in the Rift (where H.erectus appeared together with stingrays, showing a marine connection then) & Dmanisi in Georgia (at a confluence of big rivers not far from the Black-Caspian Sea connection then).
This littoral diaspora has been called the “coastal dispersal” model by Stephen Munro (Molluscs as Ecological Indicators in Palaeoanthropological Contexts 2010 PhD thesis Austr.Nat.Univ.Canberra), IMO a much better term than “aquatic ape”, see my paper attached.
Please also google the recent papers of José Joordens & Stephen Munro http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/anu-archaeologist-helps-discover-earliest-human-engravings-20141203-11ys3h.html
In any case, our Pleistocene ancestors did not run over savannas as popular views still assume: this is biologically & physiologically, see e.g. my letter to Nature 325:305-6 in 1987, Origin of hominid bipedalism:
"... Man is the opposite of a savanna inhabitant. Humans have thermo-insulative subcutaneous fat layers, which are never seen in savanna mammals. We have a water- and sodium-wasting cooling system of abundant sweat glands, totally unfit for a dry environment. Our maximal urine concentration is much too low for a savanna-dwelling mammal. We need much more water than other primates, and have to drink more often than savanna inhabitants, yet we cannot drink large quantities at a time ..." Humans have about 10 times as much SC fat as chimps, which is a serious risk of overheating in an open milieu. And salt & water are scarce on savannas: sweating is a very poor solution in open environments, but overheated furseals on land also sweat profusely through abundant sweat glands on their naked hind-flippers.
HE'13.pdf