Jump to content

Peron

Senior Members
  • Posts

    232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Peron

  1. Black holes are supposed to have infinite gravity, that means nothing escapes. And yet we see stars forming on the edge of the black hole, remember it takes millions of years for a star to form, wouldn't the black hole just eat it?
  2. Look at it in a new light, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliopause#Heliopause http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heliopause_diagram.png The Heliopause is a huge standing wave in 3D, so the planets find the the proper low density ares of the standing waves, and roll around in the "grooves" like the needle on a LP record. Remember, the videos show a single 2d standing waves, but in a solar system inside the helioshere, they are 3d and cover the entire spectrum! Meaning the planets would be confined to a certain standing waves, to each his own. Jupiter, rides on and is attached to a huge ( I mean frequency and wavelength) standing wave, mars to a small one, the moon to the earths wave and so on. Here are some vids, of standing waves confining clouds to a particular location or an area. This might be why planets stay in their orbits. Remember, it all 3d. Em, waves do not look like this>>>http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/media/Communications/frequency.gif But, like this >>>http://www.efieldsolutions.com/Pics/generic_aircraft_far2.jpg http://www.efieldsolutions.com/Pics/generic_aircraft_far1.jpg https://www.cst.com/CMS/images/article382/figure04.png All images credited to their respective websites. Look beyond math, and look at the experiments.
  3. The sun is a giant anode discharge!? If that is so, all celestial objects, pick up that charge and based on their composition, capacitance, inductance and resistance to this charge seek equilibrium. The earth has a electric field, and a magnetic field, two simple components necessary to create an oscillator circuit. Combine this with massive amounts of charge present in space, well, the solar system might simple be an electrostatic motor. The sun being the stator and the planets rotors. The rotors electrical composition dictates were and how it behaves, that is, how much charge it picks up from the sun, how it is linked to the sun, and the electrical nature of the rotor determine where it will orbit. There might not even be the classical gravity at all. As Emmanuel Velicovsky was saying all along. The planets rotation might be the torque resulting from the planets interaction with the electric properties of surrounding space. Or the planets might be simple inducing that rotation by it self onto itself via the hall effect. The hall effect needs two things present, magnetic and an electric field at right angle to each other. The hall effect usually produces motion in a straight line, but earths both fields are spherical, so instead there might be torque! Plus don't forget the em oscillation that is a resultant of the magnetic and electric fields.
  4. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28506976/ Without too much comment really. Apparently the latest woolly thinking & frantic Back-Pedalling says that - and this is a quote from the article - The finding suggests that the molecular gas at the center of the Milky Way from which the stars form is denser than previously thought. The higher density gas makes it easier for the self-gravity of the condensing cloud to overcome the strong pull of the black hole and to collapse to form new stars. What????!?!??!?!:eek::eek::eek:
  5. The Static Universe that Einstien predicted will come true. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-05/cwru-cpa052407.php http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_universe
  6. Quarks In Science Science is conducted by observation, study, and prediction. There's a problem, scientists have applied to many predictions to outer space that it has grown into a system of lies. Lets go back to 1916 when Einstein published General Relativity. He created mathematical formula's, and designed predictions all with out any knowledge of how the universe works. Now there's a problem with math, all math is a language. A language that's good for measurement. You can build a house, a car, or a spaceship. But you cannot explain how space, or even life works with mathematical formula's. Things like Bekenstein-Hawking radiation, laugh in the face of science. Because Hawking radiation is a prediction that was formulated with out any study or proof of black hole existence's. Mathematical method Scientific method 1 Understanding Characterization from experience and observation 2 Analysis Hypothesis: a proposed explanation 3 Synthesis Deduction: prediction from the hypothesis 4 Review/Extend Test and experiment Cosmology today is mostly driven by mathematical method. Something is very wrong. People making predictions with out any observations, or study. But they take this prediction and attach it to what they see. With out test and experiment. This is a huge Quark in science. Everything has turned into Pseudoscience. "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." N Tesla
  7. My search for gravity control continues. Here is a interesting link, satellites around the van der graf generator! http://books.google.com/books?id=RPWNfdCGYlIC&pg=PA182&lpg=PA182&dq=van+de+graf+generator+satellites&source=web&ots=6VvuJQjAJd&sig=39CFd-VHSV-gfCm-m3Pqsir6AuY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA183,M1 Isn't the sun a giant pseudo van der graf generator? Could it be this simple. Gravity is an electrostatic phenomena. Wow. http://www.scribd.com/doc/2602893/Midget-Van-De-Graaff-Generator <<< Scroll to the last page, at the bottom read the "Satellites in Orbit" paragraph. Amazing. This should be tested in vacuum, if it still works, we know what gravity is!? http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200702/000020070207A0035927.php http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf112/sf112p14.htm http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue61/chargeclusters.html We know that flux ropes in space have long range attraction and short range repulsion. http://www.plasma-universe.com/index.php/Image:Birkeland-current-force-graph.png So why not the some action between the sun and earth? Or other planets. All are charged bodies! http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1998/TreshaEdwards.shtml The Earth's Electrostatic Charge Tesla's intent was to condense the energy trapped between the earth and its upper atmosphere and to transform it into an electric current. He pictured the sun as an immense ball of electricity, positively charged with a potential of some 200 billion volts. The earth, on the other hand, is charged with negative electricity. The tremendous electrical force between these two bodies constituted, at least in part, what he called cosmic energy. It varied from night to day and from season to season but it is always present. The positive particles are stopped at the ionosphere and between it and the negative charges in the ground, a distance of 60 miles, there is a large difference of voltage - something on the order of 360,000 volts. With the gases of the atmosphere acting as an insulator between these two opposite stores of electrical charges, the region between the ground and the edge of space traps a great deal of energy. Despite the large size of the planet, it is electrically like a capacitor which keeps positive and negative charges apart by using the air as a non-conducting material as an insulator. The earth has a charge of 96,500 coulombs. With a potential of 360,000 volts, the earth constitutes a capacitor of .25 farads (farads = coulombs/volts). If the formula for calculating the energy stored in a capacitor (E =1/2CV2) is applied to the earth, it turns out that the ambient medium contains 1.6 x 1011 joules or 4.5 megawatt-hours of electrical energy. In order to utilize this high-voltage energy you must do two things -- make an energy sink and then devise a way of making the "sink" oscillate. http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:UW8Gfni7chMJ:www.re-news.net/energy/fall2005/resources/tesla/NIKOLA%2520TESLA3.doc+earth%27s+electrostatic+charge&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=us Electrons are charged bodies, and so are protons, could the same laws that apply to Birkeland currents, repulsion and attraction, at the atomic level? Earth is kept around the sun by its short range repulsion and long range attraction? And so are atoms? It would seem that the electrostatics have been ignored just like plasma, or are they one and the same? http://www.pureinsight.org/node/60 http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2008/arch08/080611levitation.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9GU3XpiepM&feature=related So why are we stuck to the ground? http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2004/arch/040927earth-capacitor.htm http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/earth_charge.htm http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/Capacitors/EarthCap.html We are in side the capacitor! That would make us the dielectric! What does the dielectric experience in side a capacitor? http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/D/dielectric.html http://www.millersville.edu/~jdooley/macro/macrohyp/polel/polel.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dielectric_model.svg ELECTRIC POLARIZATION! Is that gravity!? Whoa. Any scientist out there who wants to take a look at my humble musings? Or any one, help me out here! So gravity may be the result of two different things. On the surface of a planet, it might simple be electric polarization and, in space; the em rules that governs plasma! :shock: Haha, what we call gravity here on earth, may not even exist in space! Only em repulsion and attraction! The same principals that governs plasma in space might also govern how celestial bodies interact. Orginally by Influx
  8. Einstien called it his biggest blunder.
  9. Let me start by saying, something cannot and never exsist in nothing. Planets, stars, Galaxies, cannot float around in empty space. Therefore Space isnt empty, it has to be built out of something, some particale has to be keeping all this we see toghter. Right? or wrong? I call this the Real Universe, the universe composed of this particale. With in this real universe, our tiny matter cloud sits, expanding possibly into empty space. :-) I call it Tender Blue
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.