ScienceLord

Following the laws of physics 'I'm assuming', yes, they do. Matter is conserved, so if it is 'sucked in' it would stay in there meaning the black hole has more mass. This gets complicated very quickly, but surely the answer is yes?

Yes, a big bang? If anything a lot larger than that!

~ Science Lord

Well, all i can say is, admire it while you have the chance

~Science Lord

Matter and Anti-Matter cannot theoretically speaking be in different parts of the universe. For example, if Matter was on the side we were in, and Anti-Matter on the other, most of the universe will explode in pure energy. Discussing where you find Anti-Matter is one of the hardest topics.

~ Science Lord

Rightey, first things first, Neil Armstrong wouldn't be as famous and rich as he is, and the night sky would be darker than usual. But moving on to a more serious matter, we rely on the moon for many many things, probably the best known one is how the moon affects our tide, how it uses our oceans to keep it tidally 'locked'.

Our days would be shorter, the tidal pull from the gravity of the moon slows us down. The Earths rotation slows down because of the moon, but only by about a second every 50,000 years or so. But this difference on the cosmic scale is very large, in terms of millions of years, our days would be considerably shorter!

Before leaving you guys to think and discuss this, I need to ask you to admire the moon, as it wont be here for long, every year it gets four centimeters away from us.

Tell me what you guys think about this!

~ Science Lord