cryingmale

I think the onus for disallowing the intervention of genetic tinkering rests with those wishing to outlaw it. If you can find no overwhelming argument to support outlawing the ability to either enhance, or "fix" the genes of someones' child or indeed themselves, then in a free society surely it should not be done so.

Do you believe Eugenics can ever be morally justified? If so, are there any caveats that you think should be adhered to? (i.e. should you only be able to alter certain genes?) Also, aside from your personal views on the ethical implications of Eugenics, what do you think will be the fate of Eugenics in the future of society?