korfezli

I think it could be a frequency stabilizator

Electric Power transport with a frequency of 60 hz. Electricity has a frequency for transport. The issue is about transporting without loss or less loss of power. I want to keep up the frequency by boosting it each time with 60 hz in a distance. So when the grid has 60 hz, i give 60 hz of boost to give it good flow. So I do not increase the frequency but i boost it with the turning magnet. Example: 1 km power grid has 10 of these "toys" and keep up the energy stable without loss. Each 100m x 10 = 1km Normally the loss of energy is approximately 30%, when you can reduce this, you will earn much money.

Dear people, I need advise on a electro technical issue. Maybe you have already seen this scientific toy, a magnet train: Instead I believe it is not just a toy. The theory When you have a wire, you put current on it, let's say 60 hz/s, it will conduct a frequency of 60hz/s current. When you have a wire bonded with another wire for five rounds, the wire will conduct 60 hz/s, and create electromagnetism of 5hz/s When you have a wire 60 times wrapped it will conduct 60hz/s and create a boost with 60hz/s. The magnet must be set to flow for the time needed to create 60hz/s wen your current is flowing with 60hz. If the current is at 1000 hz/s, then the magnet must be set to take 1000 rounds of bonded wire and so on. Now imagine that an active superconducting can be reached by boosting the grid of power plants with 60hz/s, every second the grid is boosted with these "toys" and the grid is being boosted and kept stable providing less loss of current when transporting power. I really believe this is a simple trick and i am convinced it will work. I know there is a need for a real superconductor and that scientists all over the world are researching a powerful method. Do you think this can work?

thanks everyone, maybe later on a different topic

You are very subjective now. We do not have to agree but I think all information is present at this topic. This topic is nice to read for beginners, seniors and even for the retards. Because the elements are described and a scientific approach is argued. With new things to discuss.

I am not the person who sets science. But i am not the person who Always accepts things like scientist believe. So in my opinion every new approach should have to be researched before you can deny the hypothesis.

Yeah indeed i had read that before somewhere. Maybe things change fast . I think Wikipedia. But to come to the point, when an air ionizer is used, oxygen will ionize. If the molecule is h2o gas in the air. I thought only oxygen would ionize. There are different types of ionizators and the needle is of different material for types of atoms. Still both atoms are different, so you would expect that one of them ionizes first. Oxygen is +/- 15 timesbigger in structure than hydrogen. If it is true that all atoms must become ionized, then my method will not work. Because I thought when you ionize the oxygen, it will not freeze and the hydrogen atoms would freeze after a while, under circumstances, maybe very cold, colder then now possible.

you metion that when an ionizator ionizes a molecule containing oxygen atoms, all atoms are ionized. But the rule is, only oxygen atoms can be ionized, with the technology nowadays.

- ions cannot freeze, conclusion. Perhaps.

so it will not freeze? How can a polar molecule h2o freeze then? It is really complicated like this. So a molecule in a refrigrator, an ionized molecule,for example -1000 Celsius, will not reach his boiling point?

"If you have water molecule in gaseous state, after heating it significantly, you will turn it to gaseous hydrogen and gaseous oxygen, after heating it even more, you will turn them to hydrogen plasma and oxygen plasma state." ok it becomes liquid again and becomes solid later on, thanks. Still i have no answer to the ionization issue of the molecule in gas state, for example h2o in gas state. When you ionize the oxygen atom and freeze the molecule rapidly it will become liquid you say. So no other phenomenon will occur, i doubt it is the same. The ionization process activates the elektrons and the elektrons activate the protons, so maybe a different liquid form will be gained, like rainwater and damp visible for the human eye. I understand that at the boiling point all atoms reach a point of changing. For myself i can imagine that the force needed, the temperature needed to reach this point, can change when oxygen atoms are ionized with a ionisator. Maybe you just need -100 refrigator instead of -300 for example.

Yes and there we come to a much difficult era. Because when molecules become hard, solid, are all atoms frozen, solid? > for gases

i do not think everyone understands the question, what is mentioned. I really repeated several times. It is now step by step: the point now is, will they freeze at the same time. The other splitting issue is different i agree.

in gas state oxygen atoms can be ionized with a ionisator

And when they are already fused, in molecular state like h2o in gas state, do they freeze together, or one by one. Then the question arises what if I ionize the oxygen atom to prevent it from freezing, because activating the atom, will activate the protons too I think, because of the balance of the atom.