sas

if ever there was one who spin the donut shape object at the velocity of 8.371 meters per second? I'm done here, thank you.

In my essay, I did calculations to calculate the angle of deflation when the light across the surface of the sun by using my own principle that is velocity acceleration with the same results as Albert Einstein did calculations under relativity 1.75 arcseconds. I also did calculations to calculate the time dilation for GPS Satellite orbiting the earth compared to clock stationary on earth using my own principle with the same results when people do calculations under relativity 38 microseconds. Just me and Albert Einstein who can calculate the bending of light and time dilation using velocity acceleration principle and relativity theory and when Albert Einstein and all people around the world claim they are evidences of the general and special relativity, why my own principle do not get the same treatment ? I stated that the bending of light and the time dilation are not enough to prove that my understanding of gravity is correct though I can do the calculations, therefore I need another evidence and I have already told how to defy the gravity and I hope someday somebody who can experiment to prove it. Am I wrong? please provide me insight how I should fix it. Thanks

Mainstream Theories : 1. Inertia : Newton’s first law of motion. 2. Inertia frame of reference : Earth’s rotation centripetal acceleration, earth’s orbital centripetal acceleration and sun’s orbital centripetal acceleration considered as barriers to measure a point of space on the surface of planet earth to be referred as a good inertia frame of reference. Earth’s gravitational acceleration, friction and air resistance also give another barrier to apply the newton’s first law of motion. 3. Weight/mass By definition “mass is a property of a physical body which determines the strength of its mutual gravitational attraction to other bodies, its resistance to being accelerated by a force, and in the theory of relativity gives the mass–energy content of a system. The SI unit of mass is the kilogram (kg).” “There are at least seven different aspects of mass, or seven physical notions that involve the concept of mass.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass “In a simple case such as an object resting upon a table, the normal force on the object is equal but in opposite direction to the gravitational force applied on the object (or the weight of the object), that is, N = mg, where m is mass, and g is the gravitational field strength (about 9.81 m/s2 on Earth).” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_force In other words normal force eliminates the earth’s gravitational acceleration on every object on the surface of planet earth. Mass can be measured using scale. “In science and engineering, the weight of an object is usually taken to be the force on the object due to gravity. Weight is a vector whose magnitude (a scalar quantity), often denoted by an italic letter W, is the product of the mass m of the object and the magnitude of the local gravitational acceleration g; thus: W = mg.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight 4. Free Fall and micro gravity or zero g-force The words “free fall” used as magic words to explain everything. “In Newtonian physics, free fall is any motion of a body where its weight is the only force acting upon it.” Weight of an object is usually taken to be the force on the object due to gravity. In the statement above stated that there is gravity acting upon the body and now in the explanation below the gravity is gone. “In a uniform gravitational field, in the absence of any other forces, gravitation acts on each part of the body equally and this is weightlessness, a condition that also occurs when the gravitational field is zero (such as when far away from any gravitating body). A body in free fall experiences "0 g".” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_fall “Weightlessness, or an absence of 'weight', is an absence of stress and strain resulting from externally applied mechanical contact-forces, typically normal forces from floors, seats, beds, scales, and the like. Counterintuitively, a uniform gravitational field does not by itself cause stress or strain, and a body in free fall in such an environment experiences no g-force acceleration and feels weightless. This is also termed "zero-g" where the term is most correctly understood as meaning "zero g-force." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness Me : 1. Inertia : Newton’s first law Of motion 2. Inertia frame of reference Agree with the inertia frame of reference with addition as follows. By ignoring the air resistance and friction newton’s first law can be applied inside the ISS orbiting the earth. ISS is considered as a good inertia frame of reference because ISS’s orbital velocity acceleration eliminates the earth’s gravitational acceleration so that the earth’s gravitational acceleration on the ISS which was 8.70 m/sec² has become zero or close to zero (micro gravity). There is an expression: ISS and astronauts are moving (have orbital velocity) but are not moving (earth’s gravitational acceleration yang seharusnya 8.70 m/sec² karena adanya velocity acceleration telah menjadi zero or close to zero) on the other hand objects at rest on the surface of planet earth are not moving (do not have orbital velocity) but are moving (they experience earth’s gravitational acceleration on average is 9.79 m/sec²). The conclusion is being at rest inside the ISS and being at rest on the surface of planet earth is completely different environment. 3. Weight/mass By definition mass is the amount of matter in an object and can be measured by its resistance to being accelerated by a force. There is one only aspect of mass that is a mass is a mass. There is no normal force which eliminates the earth’s gravitational acceleration on every object on the surface of planet earth. Being stationary on the surface of the earth is the same condition as falling through an atmosphere without a deployed parachute. If an object is at rest there is a solid object underneath this object. If an object is falling through an atmosphere there is fluid object underneath the object. The formula for mass is m=w/g Weight can be measured using scale. In the absence of gravitational acceleration or in the condition of micro gravity or zero g, weight can measured using the SLAMMD (Space Linear Acceleration Mass Measurement Device) “The SLAMMD (Space Linear Acceleration Mass Measurement Device) was installed in the HRF-1 rack during Expedition 11. SLAMMD measures the on-orbit mass of crewmembers by applying Newton's Second Law of Motion (force is equal to mass times acceleration).” http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/640.html Though according Nasa SLAMMD used as a tool to measure the mass but actually this device to measure weight of astronauts who are in the ISS. 4. Free Fall and micro gravity or zero g-force. Free fall is any motion of a body or a body at rest where its weight is the only force acting upon it. Zero g-force or micro gravity or weightlessness is a condition experienced by the object which the object’s velocity acceleration eliminates the massive object’s gravitational acceleration.

Orbit is the interaction between gravitational acceleration and velocity acceleration and their directions form the a new single direction that we call as an orbit. When this happen the magnitude of sun’s gravitational acceleration effect on earth reduced by the magnitude of earth’s velocity acceleration. In the context of tide on earth, after reducing it now the moon’s gravitational acceleration is more dominant than the sun’s gravitational acceleration.

We all agree that the tides due to the gravitational acceleration of the celestial body and on earth the moon is a major influence on the Earth 's tides. Because the moon orbits and the earth, the magnitude of the moon 's gravity acceleration on Earth depends only on moon 's gravitational acceleration GM/r² and not the moon’s velocity acceleration v²/r. On the other hand the earth orbits the sun and the sun 's gravitational acceleration on earth besides depend on the magnitude of the sun 's gravitational acceleration GM/r² also depend on the earth’s velocity acceleration v²/r. Data : Moon Mass (Kg) : 7.3477E+22 Average Distance (meters) : 384,000,000 Sun Mass (Kg) : 1.9891E+30 Gravitational Constant : 6.67428E-11 Average Distance (meters) : 149,600,000,000 Average Velocity (Meters/sec) : 29,780 Sun’s gravity on the earth : GM/r² = 0.0059319550656 V²/r = 0.0059281310160 Moon’s gravity on the earth : GM/r² = 0.0000332577902 The magnitude of the sun's gravitational acceleration on Earth is 178 times bigger than the magnitude of the moon's gravitational acceleration on Earth therefor if we do not take into account the earth 's velocity acceleration, the sun will be the major influence on the Earth 's tides and not the moon.

I agree with your statement, I should not said "sun's gravitational acceleration does not longer exist", but should I said "sun's gravitational acceleration close to zero or at the minimum level on the earth and on the moon because of their velocities", thanks for your input.

Albert Einstein proposed the deflection of light by the sun as a test of general relativity. I calculated the angle of deflection and time dilation for GPS satellite orbiting the earth using my own equation and and both the results are the same while people calculate them under relativity but I do not consider them as "evidences" to justify my essay because I strongly believe that when one claim he knows the gravity perfectly he has to know how to defy the gravity. I will say I have an evidence if one spin the object at the velocity of 8,371 m/sec and this spinning object does not obey the law of gravity.

I tried to explain all the phenomena related to gravity by using the concept of velocity , including but not limited to the inertia , the shape of the orbit , bending light , black hole , time dilation , the speed of milky way galaxy , gravitational constant in a zero gravity environment , etc. I believe that you can not find the concept of velocity in Newtonian and relativity , and this little summary of the concept : "When an object moves from one point to another point in any direction inside the gravity field there is another acceleration acting on this object namely the velocity acceleration. Each moving object will see the velocity acceleration as an effort for any object to overcome these three drag factors, they are gravitational acceleration, fluid and surface. Gravitational acceleration obey square law, in terms of overcoming the gravitational acceleration as a drag. We need another acceleration and can be obtained by applying square law to the velocity so that we get velocity² or v². Then we divide this velocity square with 1 radius as the total exposure in the gravity field so that we will get the velocity acceleration"

I post under the sub forum speculations and if i know this is true, i will not post in speculations. we can not say it is not true if nobody haven't tried it yet. Both, velocity in the spinning object and satellite's velocity while orbiting the earth are the same.

I just "borrow" the words "equivalence principle" and i don't refer to the "equivalence principle" in relativity.

if you stand on the surface of earth and not being in free-fall, if you spin the object at the velocity of 8,371 meters/sec, you can put the object anywhere in the air without the object fall down. the g to the object is no longer exist. Being in free fall or being in zero gravity is completely a different situation.

I don't have any evidence to support this claim but I use the same principle to calculate the angle of bending light when a light across the surface of the sun, the angle is 1.750511243 arcsecond as I stated on my essay. I also calculate the time dilation for GPS satellite orbitting the earth at the height of 20,200,000 meters, the orbitting clock will run faster compared to the clock stationary on earth per day by 38.568 microsecond using the same principle. I use "the equivalence principle" means that gravitational acceleration on the surface of planet earth at 9.799 m/sec^2 equals to 8,371 m/sec.

On the surface of earth, if you spin the object at the velocity of 8,371 meters per second, earth gravitational acceleration is no longer exist to the spinning object. This means that you can put the spinning object in the air without fear of this object will fall down, some people say anti-gravity object. I will edit my post above and this takes time because English is not my primary language, thanks for your note.

I have written my understanding of gravity into an essay , here is the abstract, "Velocity of an object can affect the gravitational acceleration. Black hole is an example where the light can form a circular orbit in the strong gravitational field. This light is moving around that causes the observer where is not in the path of the light orbit see the black hole as total darkness. In addition, when there is a high velocity of an object has been interacting with the gravitational acceleration, the object is in the micro or zero gravity relative to massive object therefor the gravitational acceleration does no longer exist." You can download the complete essay here : http://vixra.org/abs/1505.0129 I hope to get any comments related to my essay or comments that can give enlightenment to me, thanks