Zero Momentum frame?

[Capiert]

Indirectly (re)states the bipolar, pair law.

 

Strange said something

about a zero momentum frame

that bugs me, (=drives me nuts, up the wall)

because it is so naive.

 

"There is (always) a frame

where the net momentum

is zero."

 

Big deal!

Whoopy do!

 

1. Can we measure it?

That idea is in his head,

science is (about) measurement.

Reproducing methods

& facts,

not just silly ideas (in our heads).

 

Does it tell us anything? Yes. (Almost nothing! It's so naive!)

 

2. If New york & china are both near dusk,

1 experiences sunrise

while the other (experiences) sundown,

then the (earth's) net speed to & from the sun is zero.

Conclusion: does the earth still rotate?

 

3. I have a gas pressurized in a bottle,

it's net momentum is zero.

Thus, no pressure?

 

4. The net force is always zero (Newton's 3rd law, reaction).

How much do I weigh?

I can tell you, anybody's net weight is zero,

the scale always counteracts.

The net force in the universe or anywhere is always zero.

The net momentum anywhere, is always zero, everywhere.

Boy have I said a lot.

What have we learned? Next to nothing!

Forces are always created in pairs.

Momentum is always created & destroyed in pairs.

(The same applies to energy, although physicists don't want to agree.

Restated agreeably for them:

physicists don't want to agree, that bipolar energy also exists,

although Gibb's (free) energy is used in chemistry.

Somebody has managed to polarize energy,

if physicists can't.)

 

Telling me the net is zero, only tells me the pair law. Naive(ly).

It doesn't tell me anything (else), quantitatively.

It doesn't tell me how much.

Strange's net zero momentum frame

doesn't tell (about) the constant (unstable) jitter (that happens),

as the direction differences & amounts continually change!

The (momentum formula) statement

mom-mom=0

is so naive

& meaningless

because stated so

it assumes

the total momentum (macroscopically)

has already cancelled,

which it hasn't.

Microscopically, each molecule

is moving

in it's own direction

at its own speed.

At worst, the equation should read

mom=mom.

(Or just plain momentum,

without an equation.)

In other words

the entropy**=k*mom

of all coordinates

(e.g. both of all 3 (xyz), =6 axii directions)

not just the silly net (is zero),

(that) says something more

than just zero. (=Such stupidity,

we still love ya Strange, but that's too little

for me to be fascinated with.

I can't hang that (zero) out as useful, for telling the details.

Stating the pair law (so)

says next to nothing. (=Too naive.)

 

**The thermodynamic mom (non polar)

(cause for temperature, & pressure

of a gas volume)

says something (quantitatively);

instead of (naively) nothing.

 

 

Feel free to attack, this hubris, you would call (it so).

Maybe you can change my mind?

(You've locked just about everything you can get your hands on from me.)

I appologize for the rude style, in advance,

but I don't know how to get the message across better.

Edited June 16, 2016 by Capiert

[imatfaal]

!

Moderator Note

Utter nonsense from beginning to end - laced with insults and arrogance; you did get one thing right - it's being locked.

 

If you wish to try again with fewer personal comments and a bit more desire to learn rather than preach then you may - but any posts such as above will be locked