Thread Hijack - from Spooky idea too late for Halloween

[Syn5]

 

Energy/momentum must be conserved at every point in space. If an electron gains energy somewhere and a proton loses energy somewhere else then conservation of energy cannot hold. In their rest frame you could say that when the electron gains energy the proton simultaneously loses energy. But in a reference frame moving with respect to the proton/electron the two event did not happen simultaneously, which means there was temporarily more/less energy then there should be, so energy conservation is violated.

 

Everything observed is information. (sound scientific theories point to this)

Everything observed is in. (reality as observed is not a closed system, it's part of)

Everything observed is form. (reality has space, the space in spacetime)

Everything observed is mot. (reality has time, the time in spacetime, the method)

Everything observed is ion. (greek for "going", going from one thing to another, Alpha to Omega)

 

To lay is to lie everywhere but the present. In the present tense being still is a lie. Everything observed is mot. (latin for "move")

 

Coincidence? If reality is information then it seems to me everything is conserved. Bits of information cannot be destroyed.

 

I'm also sure the number 3 is very important.

 

DAY = 1 = night/day = start/end = alpha/omega = a cycle

Sleep = 1/3 = awareness is unawareness

Awake = 2/3 = awareness is not unawareness

also we easily understand 1/3, one third, but why is the decimal form infinite? Like pi for example. Something so easily grasped, observed, yet infinitely complex.

 

So, what came first sleep or awake, night or day? Alpha is Omega and when that happens, paradox.

 

Zeno's paradoxes are a set of philosophical problems generally thought to have been devised by Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea (ca. 490–430 BC) to support Parmenides's doctrine that contrary to the evidence of one's senses, the belief inplurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but an illusion. It is usually assumed, based onPlato's Parmenides (128a–d), that Zeno took on the project of creating these paradoxes because other philosophers had created paradoxes against Parmenides's view. Thus Plato has Zeno say the purpose of the paradoxes "is to show that their hypothesis that existences are many, if properly followed up, leads to still more absurd results than the hypothesis that they are one." (Parmenides 128d). Plato has Socrates claim that Zeno and Parmenides were essentially arguing exactly the same point (Parmenides 128a–b).

Edited November 6, 2014 by Syn5