Hey,
I have previously knocked out a gene of interest in pseudomonas putida, and replaced it with a gentamicin cassette. Surrounding the gent gene are FRT sites. This part seemed to work fine, the mutants grow on gent, while the wild type do not. However, now I am trying to electroporate a plasmid containing FLP into these mutants so that FLP can remove the gent resulting in unmarked mutants. On the FLP plasmid I have (pFLP2) is a beta-lactamase gene... however, when I electroporate into the mutants and select with carbenicillin, I get equal background growth (a full on smear) on the control plate (electroporated with no pFLP2) as on the pFLP2 electroporation plate. P. putida will grow on amp, and I found that my strain (KTT2440) contains a AmpC-type Beta lactamase gene (Class C Beta lactamase), as well as many efflux pumps to very inconveniently pump out antibiotics quickly before they can take effect. I have tried concentrations from 200ug/ml - 1mg/ml of carbenicillin, and although there will be less growth on plates at higher concentrations, the growth is still equal on the control plate as on the pFLP2 electroporated plate. I have also looked for a tetR FLP plasmid for use in P. putida, but have not found one in the literature... tetracycline was suggested as a much better and stronger antibiotic to use for selection in P. putida.
(I am making my comp cells from an OD600 of appx. 0.5 with 3 washes in 0.5M sucrose.)
Any ideas of a way around this would be incredibly helpful!
Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Page 1 of 1
bacteria seem to be naturally resistant to antibiotic on plasmid pFLP2
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!

MultiQuote








