Jump to content

estimating IGM density from cooling curve (?)


Recommended Posts

For T < 104 K, the cooling curve of the ISM scales as ~T7 (Gaetz & Saltpeter 1983):

 

P
[ergs cm3 s-1]
= -10
-23
x n
h
x n
e
x (T/10
4
K)
7

And, since z ~ 2, the IGM has cooled from 10,000 to 4,000 K:

 

igmannotatedq.jpg

From
z ~ 6 to 2
, Cluster gas continued to influence the IGM, maintaining its temperature through outflows. After
z ~ 2
, however, Clusters completely decoupled from the Hubble Flow, continuing to contract, compress, & heat Cluster gas. Meanwhile, the now isolated IGM, in the receding voids, began to cool radiatively. (Source:
Majestic Universe
[scientific American special report], pg. 8.)

So, we seek to calculate the cooling, of the IGM, as a function of time, in a Critical, matter-dominated cosmos. Consider, then, a comoving volume, expanding with the stretching of spacetime, having a volume V(t) = R(t)3.

 

 

 

Order-of-Magnitude Calculation

 

In the comoving volume, where the matter only loses energy, to radiation, through aforestated cooling, w.h.t.:

 

[math]E \approx \frac{\rho}{m_H} k T \times V(t) \approx \frac{M_{tot}}{m_H} k T[/math]
[ergs]

 

[math]\frac{dE}{dt} \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho}{m_H} \right)^2 \left( \frac{T}{T_0} \right)^7 \times V(t) \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{M_{tot}}{m_H} \right)^2 \left( \frac{T}{T_0} \right)^7 \times V(t)^{-1}[/math]
[ergs s
-1
]

 

[math]\therefore \frac{dE}{dt} \approx \frac{M_{tot}}{m_H} k \frac{dT}{dt} \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{M_{tot}}{m_H} \right)^2 \left( \frac{T}{T_0} \right)^7 \times V(t)^{-1}[/math]

 

[math]k \frac{dT}{dt} \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{M_{tot}}{m_H} \right) \left( \frac{T}{T_0} \right)^7 \times \frac{1}{R_0^3} \left( \frac{R_0}{R(t)} \right)^3 \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho_0}{m_H} \right) \left( \frac{T}{T_0} \right)^7 \times \left( \frac{R_0}{R(t)} \right)^3[/math]

Then, since we assume matter-dominated cosmology, R(t) ~ t2/3:

 

[math]\therefore k \frac{dT}{dt} \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho_0}{m_H} \right) \left( \frac{T}{T_0} \right)^7 \times \left( \frac{t_0}{t} \right)^2[/math]

Defining normalized variables:

 

[math]\therefore \frac{k T_0}{t_0} \frac{d\tau}{dx} \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho_0}{m_H} \right) \tau^7 \times x^{-2}[/math]

This is easily integrated:

 

[math]\frac{k T_0}{t_0} \int_1^{0.4} \frac{d\tau}{\tau^7} \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho_0}{m_H} \right) \int_{z=2}^1 \frac{dx}{x^2}[/math]

 

[math]\frac{k T_0}{6 t_0} \left( 0.4^{-6} - 1 \right) \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho_0}{m_H} \right) \left( 1 - x^{-1}|_{z=2} \right)[/math]

But, R(t) ~ (1+z)-1, which, when combined with the above, gives x ~ (1+z)-3/2:

 

[math]\frac{k T_0}{6 t_0} \left( 0.4^{-6} - 1 \right) \approx -10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho_0}{m_H} \right) \left( 1 - 3^{3/2} \right) \approx 10^{-23} \left( \frac{\rho_0}{m_H} \right) \left( 3^{3/2} - 1 \right)[/math]

And, letting [math]\rho_0 \equiv \alpha \rho_{crit}[/math], w.h.t.:

 

[math]\alpha \approx 10^{23} \frac{k T_0}{6 t_0} \frac{m_H}{\rho_{crit}} \frac{ 0.4^{-6} - 1 }{3^{3/2} - 1}[/math]

Now, for a Critical cosmology, t0 = (2/3) H0-1. So, using the usual formula, for the Critical Density, w.h.t.:

 

[math]\therefore \alpha \approx 10^{23} \frac{m_H k T_0}{4} \frac{8 \pi G}{3 H_0} \frac{ 0.4^{-6} - 1 }{3^{3/2} - 1} \approx 10^{23} \left( m_H k T_0 \right) \left( \frac{2 \pi G}{3 H_0}\right) \left( \frac{ 0.4^{-6} - 1 }{3^{3/2} - 1}\right) \approx 0.80 \, h_{72}^{-1}[/math]

According to this calculation, and assuming a matter-dominated Critical cosmology, the IGM has been cooling, since z ~ 2, from roughly 2 to 9 Gyr, as if its density were comparable to Critical. Thus, such a cosmology could account, for the cooling, observed in the IGM (which will soon undergo a "second Recombination" event, perhaps w/in roughly +1 Gyr +10 Tyr).

 

 

 

Numerical Factors

 

For a multi-component gas, the energy density is E = (3/2) ntot k T. And, for 4,000 K < T < 10,000 K, and at ultra-low IGM gas pressures, Hydrogen is almost entirely ionized, whereas Helium is almost entirely neutral. So, ignoring the low IGM metallicity (Z ~ 0.007), w.h.t.:

 

[math]n_{tot} = n_H + n_{He} + n_Z + n_e \approx n_H + n_{He} + n_H = 2 n_H + n_{He} \approx \rho_{tot} \times \left( 2 \frac{X}{m_H} + \frac{Y}{4 m_H} \right)[/math]

Using canonical values, for the mass-fractions, X = 3/4 & Y = 1/4, w.h.t. [math]n_{tot} \approx \frac{\rho_{tot}}{m_H} \times 25/16[/math]. So, on the LHS, we have omitted numerical factors, of order unity, but specifically equal to 3/2 x 25/16 = 75/32. (Physically, hot, Hydrogen-ionized IGM, has ~2.5x more energy content, than was recognized above, due to having three degrees-of-freedom, and all of the extra Hydrogen-ionized electrons.)

 

Likewise, on the RHS, since all the radiative cooling comes from the (near-)fully ionized Hydrogen, recombining with its own electrons, we require the product of:

 

[math]n_H n_e \approx n_H^2 \approx \left( \frac{X \rho_{tot}}{m_H} \right)^2[/math]

So, on the RHS, we have omitted numerical factors, of order unity, but specifically equal to X2 = 9/16. (Physically, hot, Hydrogen-ionized IGM, has only ~0.5x the cooling capacity, compared to what was recognized above, mainly due to all of the non-radiating mass 'locked away' in Helium.)

 

And, so, our original, order-of-magnitude estimate, for the fraction of Critical density in gas [math]\alpha[/math], we neglected to multiply by the ratio, of "LHS / RHS" = 75/32 x 16/9 = 75/18 ~ 4. (Physically, hot, Hydrogen-ionized IGM, has more energy content, and less cooling capacity, than was recognized above -- and, so, must be much more dense, to decrease its temperature, at the same rate.) Thus, more accurate physics seemingly suggests more strongly, that a matter-dominated Critical cosmology can account, or is even required to account, for observed IGM cooling, since z ~ 2 (~7 Gyr ?).

 

 

 

second Recombination

 

Sticking with the same physics, the IGM will cool to 3000 K ([math]\tau_f = 0.3[/math]), at some future time, when the relative age of the universe is [math]x = 1 + \delta x[/math]:

 

[math] 0.3^{-6} - 1 = 3^{3/2} - (1 + \delta x)[/math]

 

[math]\delta x = 0.3^{-6} - 3^{3/2} \approx 1400[/math]

Thus, given the expansion of space-time, and the IGM's already-quasi-cold condition, the IGM is could require trillions of years, to cool back down to 3000 K.

Edited by Widdekind
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.