Jump to content

Energy Eingenstates of 2 particles in a potential 'box'


mooeypoo

Recommended Posts

Final is coming up, and I'm going over all my homework.

 

I'm trying to understand this part, though, and i'm not sure I get it.

Question: Two non interacting particles of mass m each are inside a cubical box of side a and rigid walls (potential 0 inside and infinity outside).

a) Write the states for the lowest 3 values of the energy if the particles are distinguishable. What is the degeneracy of each level?

So, this is an infinite square well in three dimentions, with two particles:

 

Energy eigenstates are represented with:

 

[math]E_n=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(n_{x_1}^2+n_{y_1}^2+n_{z_1}^2 + n_{x_2}^2+n_{y_2}^2+n_{z_2}^2 )[/math]

 

In an infinite square well with one particle, I can start with an eigenstate [math]E_{100}=E_{010}=E_{001}[/math] - that is, I can have n=0.

 

In the answer sheet, though, the eigenstate are in a table, like this:

 

[math]E=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(3 + 3)[/math]

Which is

[math]|111>_{1}|111>_{2}[/math]

(Degeneracy = 1)

 

[math]E=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(6 + 3)[/math]

Which is

[math]|211>_{1}|111>_{2}[/math]

[math]|121>_{1}|111>_{2}[/math]

[math]|112>_{1}|111>_{2}[/math]

[math]|111>_{1}|211>_{2}[/math]

[math]|111>_{1}|121>_{2}[/math]

[math]|111>_{1}|112>_{2}[/math]

(Degeneracy = 6)

 

 

But why is this eigenstate wrong? Shouldn't that be the first energy level??

[math]E=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(1 + 1)[/math]

Which is

[math]|001>_{1}|001>_{2}[/math]

[math]|001>_{1}|010>_{2}[/math]

[math]|001>_{1}|100>_{2}[/math]

[math]|100>_{1}|100>_{2}[/math]

[math]|100>_{1}|010>_{2}[/math]

[math]|100>_{1}|001>_{2}[/math]

[math]|010>_{1}|001>_{2}[/math]

[math]|010>_{1}|010>_{2}[/math]

[math]|010>_{1}|100>_{2}[/math]

(Degeneracy = 9)

 

I have a problem with part 2, two (the question then goes to ask what are the three values of the lowest energies if the particles are bosons, then fermions [i know one's symmetric and one isn't]), but I'll wait 'till I get the first part before I move on.

 

Thanks!

 

~moo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wave function of the 3D infinite square well potential factorizes into three factors each solving the 1D problem (note that this is a reminder, I assume you to know that), i.e f(x,y,z) = fx(x)*fy(y)*fz(z). Each of the functions fx, fy and fz have to solve the 1D problem. The lowest energy state for this 1D seems to be labeled n=1 in your problem; there is no n=0 solution (if there was then the lowest state would be |000>/|000>).

 

You can also think of it in a less abstract manner and in terms of the square of the wave function: The wave function needs to have a zero value on all of the six walls of the potential, not only at those parallel to one of the spacial directions.

 

EDIT: In short: |100>, |010>, |001> are not solutions for the single particle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wave function of the 3D infinite square well potential factorizes into three factors each solving the 1D problem (note that this is a reminder, I assume you to know that), i.e f(x,y,z) = fx(x)*fy(y)*fz(z). Each of the functions fx, fy and fz have to solve the 1D problem. The lowest energy state for this 1D seems to be labeled n=1 in your problem; there is no n=0 solution (if there was then the lowest state would be |000>/|000>).

 

Right! I did this problem in 3D with a single particle, and the available energy levels did have 0 in them (|001> , |010>, |100> was the first).

 

How do I know that in this case the levels start from 111 ?? My initial answer had 0 in it.. is that wrong? I'm confused. How am I supposed to know in advance?

 

You can also think of it in a less abstract manner and in terms of the square of the wave function: The wave function needs to have a zero value on all of the six walls of the potential, not only at those parallel to one of the spacial directions.
I don't understand ..

 

EDIT: In short: |100>, |010>, |001> are not solutions for the single particle.
... why not?

 

Here's another problem I solved from an earlier homework (that's why I'm confused about the current one, they're VERY similar, only with another particle)

A particle of mass m is confined inside a rectangular box of sides a, a and 2a. Find the energy and deceneracy of the lowest three energy levels.

Since [math]\Psi=X(x)Y(y)Z(z)[/math] like you said, the wave equation is:

[math]\Psi = \frac{2}{a}\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}sin(\frac{n_x \pi x}{a})sin(\frac{n_y \pi y}{a})sin(\frac{n_z \pi x}{2a})[/math]

 

And the Energy:

 

[math]E_n = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2} \big( n_x^2 + n_y^2 + \frac{n_z^2}{4} \big)[/math]

 

And the lowest three states (according to the answer sheet too):

 

[math]E_{001}=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi}{8ma^2}[/math]

(the answer sheet writes the above as E_000, but that's surely a mistake)

 

And

[math]E_{100}=E_{010}=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi}{2ma^2}[/math]

 

And

[math]E_{101}=E_{011}=\frac{5\hbar^2 \pi}{8ma^2}[/math]

 

 

So, in this case we COULD have n=0 state! this is more or less the same situation as above (a box) only with another particle. What am I missing? Why is this case okay with n=0 and the first case with 2 particles not okay with n=0?

Edited by mooeypoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.