npbreakthrough

thanks for your reply,......basically i was just looking for a quick summary of philosophy's most important debates,....i use the "book" idea because i figured it would be a little more fun to answer than just "what are the top 10 philosophy.....etc".....and i was just kidding about writing the book myself,.....i was hoping peoples naming of the chapters would give me a good scope of where i could focus my own pondering. i have thousands of philosophy books and would like to jump right into the most recent and controversial ideas.

If some one were to write a Book, on philosophy and its most important , perplexing , intriguing, and mysterious questions, .....and this book consisted of 10 chapters, one on each greatly debated questions......what would be the names of each chapter? thanks for your replies,.....so i can get right to work on this book........jk

Philosophy is what philosophers do.............and from time to time,....philosophers crap.

hey buddy, i am a welder, and trust me, welding aluminum is a pain in the ass, my honest opinion and advice to you would be to get a welder, i attempted to MIG and TIG aluminum in welding school and i hate it, i refuse to weld aluminum but if you have to do it yourself, MIG is your best option trust me you don't want to get into all the crap involved in TIG, sharpening electrodes, switching currents , forming the electrodes into a "ball" using foot pedal,worrying about melting point......etc all at the same time, it is horrible......that's why aluminum welders make the large amounts of money you don't want to pay them.... welding is an art form comprised of many stressful considerations, machine settings, all your equipment safety standards and codes, travel angles , the crap is almost too much to list, plus most welds are tested , even x-ray tested for quality ...... as for "poor mans tig machine"...... not a chance, these machines are very precise and for a very specific purpose,.....much more specialized than a car battery.....

i agree, GIA your posts are boring me to death, if you cant understand the important role that religion has played in the development of human society and can only rephrase your misunderstanding of religious precepts into arrogant quips you'll be none the wiser.

markearthling im no big evolution fan myself, i find the mechanism of unguided chance mutation to simply be inadequate to explain the varieties of life and systems withing living creatures, but understand that science is not interested in the theories that deal with the supernatural science must try and solve problems with the only tools that science has, and that is the natural evolution is the only theory currently available that can attempt to explain how all these things happen absent of the supernatural just because evolution does not explain everything , does not give anybody the right to inject supernatural ideas into scientific query doing so adds nothing to the debate science does not necessarily explain things away from the supernatural and the supernatural explanation is not always needed when natural explanation is inadequate

alright, thanks for everyone's replies, as for the title "is the number 1 flawed" i am not necessarily picking on just this number, i guess what i was trying to get at was how inadequate can numbers be when subjected to certain theoretical math but my questions were answered, with units and formulas, the strictness of a single digit can be more malleable and useful and with our ability to create new fields of mathematics we are constantly able to reform our current views thanks to everyone, replying to my posts especially drrocket michel123456 soon i will have my 30 posts and ill be able to move onto the religion and philosophy threads where i am much better suited

evolution doesn't give animals what they need..........

try and make non-Newtonian fluid http://www.instructables.com/id/How-To%3A-Make-Non-Newtonian-Fluid-%26-Experiment-wit/

Pure evil

we use mathematics to probe the limits of our universe, its a philosophical issue that because we can accurately describe our material universe with mathematics , a mathematical basis for our universe is implied, but what if that is not accurate, and instead our failure to completely understand our universe, even our ability to ever fully understand our universe is because mathematics is too rigid perhaps the abstract ideas of mathematics invented by man fail because our universe is more analog then digital (i know analog and digital deal with something else, but its the best analogy i could think of at the moment, digital being mathematics)

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159654/20110608/red-bull-killer-stephen-coffeen.htm http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159654/20110608/red-bull-killer-stephen-coffeen.htm

??

i think the magnets on the rail are in a fixed position facing one way, maybe if you engineered it so each magnet could swivel

thanks for your reply, i figured it would be painfully obvious, my concern is that in recent weeks, the pentagon has declared that certain cyber attacks could be construed as acts of war, but if people could steal anything worth going to war over, then it would be our own fault for making that info available. and the submission of info that sensitive into public servers would constitute some sort of dereliction of duty to begin with, meaning our government basically invited the intrusion, and failed to keep us safe