BrentNewland

It is all very hard to find out with what we know of science right now. However, I find it hard to believe that going forward from the past would change your memories. In order for hyperspace to work, or for us to leave the universe, I think that we would have to hope that my theory that the most basic building blocks of matter exist independently of each other and are their own forms of a high dimension. If this is so, then leaving the universe would be possible, because we would in essence have our own universe. If we could leave the universe, then travelling through the fourth dimension might not be a problem, since you would be travelling independently of our universe. You could trael through time and reenter a prior version of the universe, change something, then travel back. That, of course, assumes that the fourth dimension does not have to contain a copy for every possible moment in time for every iteration of the universe, but instead keeps a memory of each point in time for the said universe. So, if you travel outside of the universe and back into it at a previous point in time, it could very well be like living a memory, with you being unable to change anything. Of course, under this model, you might not even be allowed to enter the memory under normal circumstances, simply because it would be a memory and not real.

I posted this on my blog and I wanted to get some feedback on it. Note I did not do any research prior to writing this down, it was only after that I found similar information might be available. I was recently thinking about how time has always seemed to move differently for me than other people (i.e. when I last saw my friend was only a month ago, but it seems like at least 4 months). I was forced to think: How do we tell time? How do we see how much time has passed? The answer is obvious: we relate to time through our memories, because time to us is basically a string of moments. We tell how long ago something was by its relation to other memories and by how hard it is to remember certain details from that memory. I.E. the longer time goes on the more memories you will lose - similar to video compression, your mind removes a certain number of frames, giving you the same sequence in less space. But what if someone has memory problems? Their mind will do this after a short period of time, and something that was a short time ago will appear to be a long time ago, because their memories of recent events are so compressed. edit I have searched the internet on this subject, and found a paper by Aristotle on the subject. I'm not sure why, but I can't seem to read the whole paper :/ Anyways, I feel that more explanation is needed. Let us equate a sequence in time to the alphabet (for chronological purposes, since everyone knows the alphabet) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ Z is the most recent event. In a normal person, the memory compression would be like this: A_C_EF_HI_KLM_OPQ_STUV_XYZ with the blank spaces being points of time that have been dropped from the mind due to insignificance (determined by the amount of certain chemicals in the brain at the time of the memory; this implies that each memory has a fingerprint or hash that tells the brain how important the memory is). Now, someone with short-term memory problems would end up with compression like this: A___E___I__L__O__R__U_W_YZ The long term memory receives higher compression, and the short term memory is compressed sooner. This could be caused by a lack of proper space, an imbalance of the proper chemicals in the brain not giving memories the right level of importance, or a problem in the brain itself that causes the importance threshold to be higher than normal, causing it to believe that high importance memories should be compressed more or removed.

I don't think that hyperspace exists, but I believe it is possible to travel vast distances in short amounts of time. It takes some roundabout thinking, so here goes (note: I am only 17 years old and planning on being a HS dropout, so take everything I say with a couple buckets of salt): A one dimensional plane may contain one dimensional objects. A two dimensional plane may contain two dimensional objects and one dimensional objects on one dimensional planes contained within the two dimensional planes (multiple basic planes inside a more advanced plane). Extending this, one can surmise that a fourth dimensional plane (time) may contain multiple 3-dimensional planes within it. In order to travel quickly across a 3-dimensional plane, one would have to remove ones self from the plane, in essence becoming their own plane, and travel to another part of the first 3-dimensional plane through the fourth-dimensional plane. All this talk of planes is kind of confusing. Might it be more likely that instead of multiple universes and planes containing many objects, each most basic particle is its own plain of existance, with the planes interacting with each other to form matter and universes? To make that fit though, I think that the most basic element of matter would have to exist in the most basic dimension. And the definition of basic is the most fundamental, the building block. And fundamental is an essential component; therefore the most basic dimension would be the dimension that all other dimensions must be able to exist in. So the most complex dimension (the tenth or eleventh according to our theorys?) would have to be the most fundamental and basic. So if each fundamental particle of matter were its own universe, then they would all be the 10th or 11th universal objects, and they interact to create lesser dimensions. Does this make any sense to anyone else? Because I've kind of confused myself.