professorvaughn

Sorry forgot to mention an important detail of the problem. So let me just rephrase the question. 80 is the average number for 25% of the people 95 is the average number overall So I need the average number for 75% of the others so it will equate to 95

I'm really bad at this sort of thing and this is not homework, just curious about learning how to do this type of problem. 80 is the represented number of 25% of the people Find the other represented number for 75% of the other people

This is not mine, but I would like to post it here because a certain individual claims its the "truth" despite having no real basis in reality. "Light itself is merely a concept; light does not exist. Light is not an autonomous thing. It is a complex field modality, it is a coaxial circuit comprised of longitudinal refractions and transverse, whether that be linearly or circular polarization, electrical and magnetic components. What we actually have is a repeating toroidal pulse perturbation with which electricity, by the way being phi * psi = q of the planck of electrification (electricity is a hybrid of magnetism and dielectricity), we have a repeating toriodal pattern which manifests at X-known frequency of the electromagnetic spectrum all the way from gamma to the other end of infrared and even further. But from the premise of science, relativity and the idiocy of Einstein, we certainly apply the fact that as Tesla himself face-palmed back in his day that space has no properties. The huge ignorance and insanity of Einstein, the greatest stupidity that he ever was guilty of, was the reification of space as something that does something upon other things. But space is no different from a shadow. Shadows don't affect things, of course we can say that we can stand in a shadow and we get cold but that doesn't reify shadow as a subject; as a principle. A shadow is a privation of light. The same is true with space, space is a posterior attribute of the loss of inertia as manifest as magnetism. The only thing that gives anything volume in the universe is magnetism. And there are fundamentally only three field modalities. Transverse, longitudinal, and Toroidal but for principles we can simply deem that as circular. Space exists inside a volume, a volume does not exist inside a space. We only of illumination but we only know of illumination when it manifests. Without resistence, permeability or permitivity there is no manifestation of light. This answers why you will see an infinite darkness when you turn away from the sun. Because there is nothing that could allow it's manifestation. So fundamentally we must say from the premise of simplex Platonic logic that there's no such thing as light. If there's only two things in the universe, the sun and yourself, and you turn your back to the sun (assuming that you're not being fried to death) the universe would be infinitely be nothing but darkness. Oh but how could that be, you have a gigantic light source directly at your back. Well everything in the universe if fundamentally only one of four things, which is to say fundamentally only one thing, capicatance/resistance permeability/permititivty. Magnetic permeability/dielectric permitivity. Light is a field modality, transverse electrical magnetic. If we take the cross section of any magnetic field we would have the torus and the hyperboloid. What we actually see and what science in it's great ignorance has misunderstood is when these electromagnetic transverse perturbances, whether they're circular or linear polarizations, appear we actually have refractions of the field. When they diminish we actually have compressions. Compressions, refractions, compressions, refractions. Same thing with waves, like I said waves are not a thing; waves are what something does. There's no such thing as a wave. There is no such thing as an electromagnetic wave. Oh, but sure there is. Well it's X-frequency of electromagnetism. Frequency of what? A field is not a thing. A field is an ether perturbation modality. Phi * Psi = q of planck of electrification, Phi being magnetism and Psi being dielectricity. Magnetism is the release of that inertia as manifest in volume. The volume of that electromagnetism is light. EMR, Electromagnetic radiation. What is light? In electromagnetism magnetism is the transverse carrier of electricity. What we think of light is merely a concept. We only of illumination but we only know of illumination when it manifests. Without resistence, permeability or permitivity there is no manifestation of light. This answers why you will see an infinite darkness when you turn away from the sun. Because there is nothing that could allow it's manifestation. Specifically illumination, light is merely a concept. Light does not exist, we have illumination. We think of the posterior release - release of what? Nothing is released, the person in the middle of the pond waving his arms is not releasing anything. His arms aren't growing longer, is it? He's disturbing the water by flapping his arms. Setting up a field perturbation, in this case the field i.e. the Ether and the inertia, would be the water. Those waves are refractions and compressions of the Ether. Nothing admits light, do you think a lightbulb is admitting light? It's a field perturbation. Do you think the piston in your car are actually propelling you down the road? Well, they're reciprocating up and down but they're not actually traveling in a longitudinal faction in the direction that the car is moving. That's kind of a gross analogy, obviously. How is it the case that people don't understand and we don't think that way we think of something larger to logically contain something more. "The larger it is the more power it must contain, larger bulldozers are more powerful, right?" Well, the inverse is the case of electricity. Counterspace is a term used to describe the infinite divisibility of a finite volume. Think of it like increasing the surface area of an object in a fixed volume. Mathematically, adding smaller and smaller structures onto the surface of the object like a fractal can be done to infinitely increase the surface area of the object. So in a way, the object is expanding into counterspace, while not expanding by volume at all." Could you disprove this at the fundamental level so he'll understand?