joshuagolden00

thanks for the response!! love looking deep into things i cant find anywhere.. best data is in multiferroic stuff.. hmm.. every thing u say seems true, except that doesn't change that a charged particle would see them as one, so there is an averaged dynamic that is oddly unspoken of.. and about the giant toroidal magnet and small dipole.. hmmm.. idk man, if the little ones end is in the middle of the big one, then all its say, 'S' flux must navigate all that toroidal flux, becoming 'mostly' toridal.. therefore as it meets the unbent N flux, some sort of deal is made and an average bend is left.. but its obviously much more complex than that.

^indeed.. yeah oddly i know quite a bit about vacuum dynamics.. i admit i didnt read the whole thing, think it was a late night.. but one thing thats always bothered me was how the photons that were coming into being in the middle region of the gap, knew not to be, even tho they had not blossomed into a full unit? so really excluding direct wall contact, we still have a problem. right? but whats this is really getting down to is that as much as people hate to admit it, the vacuum carries an immense amount of info and energy about everything to everything allll the time.. likely mostly thru entanglement.. helping to explain spontaneous entanglement, and entanglement resurrection. iv even read of some people thinking it might be ez to send a signal to a receiver, where the receiver pays for the 'pick up' and the sender only turns a DETECTOR on and off.. same logic really.. so it must be possible

that is basically how the anapole does its cancellation.. anti-phasing..

old tempting vidieo

from scientific american: "An excited atom in a small cavity is precisely such as antenna, albeit a microscopic one. If the cavity is small enough, the atom will be unable to radiate because the wavelength of the oscillating field it would "like" to produce cannot fit within the boundaries. As long as the atom cannot emit a photon, it must remain in the same energy level; the excited state acquires an infinite lifetime." if its unradiated, how does it know it wont fit? - it hasn't touched or seen the walls.. and why does it 'fitting' really matter, why not just radiate and get all messed up, why does it care at all?

thanks sooo much for giving this ur attention, its deeply gratifying to have a real conversation about this.. been looking for stuff along these lines for a looong time.. but i did find out what i was missing, at least in one example given.. the E and M are (obviouslyXP) aligned and excited such that when u excite the system correctly ("nonradiatively") u induce each part of the system to radiate a system that is the inverse of the others existence and or its own potential radiative.. both neutralizing each other .. its so simple! i was expecting something more complicated so i kept trying to look to deep.. but your answer was enlightening.. i often forget that much in the near and far are very different.. guess i usually work on nearfield dynamics. but some other dynamics directly along these lines have bothered me for ages.. what happens to the energy and info of a photon when it meats its (nearly;) complete opposite? really fun to imagine whole laser beams disappearing like that.. its ez to envision with just a beam spliter and a few mirrors to bend the beam around annnd out.. of.. phase?.... is it reduced to the potentials some how? how would light made of only the 'EM vector potentials' behave differently than regular light? or is that just crazy.

PLEASE! what do the E, M, A's and ponying vectors look like when a permanent magnetic dipole has one half of its body (pole) charged + like "N & +" and the other half "S & -"? and then importantly whats the other orientation (N-)&(S+) behave like.. (just to make sure im not missing anything;) and what happens to a dipoles flux when its placed in the center of a large permanent toroidal magnet.. does the A field curl all its flux? thanks!

true, but being this symmetric leaves me wondering still exactly whats happening.. especially since almost all other configurations radiate strongly.. (hopf links are the other)... theres definitely something unique about the anapoles non radiating

thanks, so u think its just that its fuzzing out/into itself?

why does the E and M of an Anapole destructively interfere in the far field and not in the near field? is it related to waveicles (a near infinite set of waves becoming destructively and constructively localized)

any help at all would be awesome! and try not to describe in mathematics as much as u can! please help me figure out what happens to the E, M, A's and ponying vectors of the following. each examples components have equal strength fields in all categories except when explicitly stated otherwise. so as much E as M and as much dipole as toroid ect ect.. first of all why do virtual photons behave so much differently than regular photons.. and please teach me what u know about the A fields of for example a permanent toroidal magnet.. like how exactly (in what way exactly) dose it create a shift in the phase and or organization of charged particles? is it just a sort of translation or is it also a rotation and in what - is it the probability field itself or is it the underlying virtual particles? or are those mostly inseparable? and whats the differences between an electric fields A and an magnetic toroids A? what do the E, M, A's and ponying vectors look like when a permanent magnetic dipole has its entire surface charged(+)? and then (-)?... just to be sure im not missing anything;) BTW just ignore conductivity and keep the following surfaces charge accordingly.. what do the E, M, A's and ponying vectors look like when a permanent magnetic dipole has one half (pole) charged (N+) and the other half (S-)? and then importantly whats the other orientation (N-)&(S+) behave like? whats the E, M, A's and ponying vectors look like when a magnetic dipole is embedded in a toroidal permanent magnets axis of rotational symmetry, with its flux (at least initially) perpendicular to the toroidal flux, such that it is surrounded on all but one poles side. now much as above imagine a VERY large permanently magnetized toroidal magnet.. imagine putting a small long dipole a little ways into its A axis with its flux (at least initially) perpendicular to the toroidal flux.. such that the north or south pole is pushed into the rings of toroidal flux.. and the other pole is completely exposed.. at least at the moment of pushing in, would not a spiral of flux 'flow' out of the toroidal magnet, and then upon its first attempts at 'connecting' with the small exposed pole of the dipole, how does this magnetic vortex conserve angular momentum yet also not change speed (C..)? one last.. set.. ..what dose the E, M, A's and ponying vectors of the following look like. this time theres a spherical toroidal magnet with a spherical dipole magnet at its core with its flux (at least initially) perpendicular to the toroidal flux.. and the surface of it is charged in the following separate ways. wholly (+).. then later.. wholly (-) (+N x toroid) & (-S x toroid) .... (-N x toroid) & (+S x toroid) ................ (+N x reversed toroid) & (-S x reversed toroid) .... (-N x reversed toroid) & (+S x reversed toroid) ................. (+N x toroid) & (-S x reversed toroid) .... (-N x reversed toroid) & (+S x toroid) ................. (+N x reversed toroid) & (-S x toroid) .... (-N x toroid) & (+S x reversed toroid) thank you very much for any help! iv gotten my own theories and lessons about this over the years, but i cant find almost any data on most of it!? pictures are worth a billion words here btw, thanks for any help!!