Edward Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 How many can you think of (and name with properties). Anamantium (not spelled right) From X-Men A very shiny non mallibule non corrsive mettal that is virtually industrucitiable and once forged cannot be destroyed. Naquada From SG-1 Non radioactive highley reactive super heavy element looks like grafite. Naqaudria SG-1 same as naquada but more reactive and is more unstable. Maclarium SG-1 does not exist in nature atomic weight over 200 most likley non radioactive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insane Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 How about that element from Spider-man 2? I forget the name, someone refresh my memory. It looked pretty damn cool though. Edit: Was it 'Tritium'? Isn't Tritium H3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budullewraagh Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 it's the isotope of hydrogen known as H3, yes. Anamantium=adamantium actually "Anamantium (not spelled right) From X-Men A very shiny non mallibule non corrsive mettal that is virtually industrucitiable and once forged cannot be destroyed. probably a transition metal related to osmium, iridium, tungsten Naquada From SG-1 Non radioactive highley reactive super heavy element looks like grafite. probably ununquadium Naqaudria SG-1 same as naquada but more reactive and is more unstable. probably below ununquadium Maclarium SG-1 does not exist in nature atomic weight over 200 most likley non radioactive. inconceivable based on the fact that it is not found in nature AND it's NOT radioactive" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insane Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 Oh yeah, What about the Bob Lazar guy who claimed Ununpentium could actually exist without decaying instantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2SO4 Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 Oh yeah, What about the Bob Lazar guy who claimed Ununpentium could actually exist without decaying instantly. Bob lazar is the owner of unitednuclear.com and does pyrotechnic shows in desert blast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akcapr Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 wats desert blast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2SO4 Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 Its a crazy event were hardcore people go in nevada (i think) and shoot of fireworks and walk around naked and theres bikers. I havent read this whole site, but it should get an overview. Its probaly an incredible event. http://www.desertblast.org/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 BO0 (it`s just after Magnessium). apparently it`s the element of surprise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackout Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 my teacher has named one from his name, the Besnerium! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darth tater Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 How about Kryptonite (sp?) from Superman? Is there really such an element? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 How about Kryptonite (sp?) from Superman? Is there really such an element? Thats a fictional compound but not element. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 Krypton. some of these aren't elements, but fake compounds. like Kryptonite and Adamantium. edit: Lance, grrr... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2SO4 Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 I always thought of adamantium as an allow of several elements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MulderMan Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 dilithium, latinum and the rest of the star trek ones. theres a list here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_elements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
entropydave Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 ...if any of these 'exotic' transuranic elements exist, then they would have been spotted in stellar spectra - even very short 1/2 life ones like Al26 have been detected, so if thre were any >115 atomic no. elements, I wuold have guessed they would have been found, albeit fleetingly! my 2 femtograms worth.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdurg Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 In order to get nuclei of that weight, you need to fuse very large atoms together. A star only produces atoms of any appreciable weight when it is collapsing into a supernova. So I am fairly confident that even in the far reaches of space, elements >115 don't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insane Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 H2S04, google 'Bob Lazar' and you'll know what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In My Memory Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Dihydrogen monoxide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soulestada Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Dihydrogen monoxide? Isn't that another name for water? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 i guess water is fictional now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akcapr Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 dueterium oxide is heavy water. i have no idea wat significance that has here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
entropydave Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 In order to get nuclei of that weight, you need to fuse very large atoms together. A star only produces atoms of any appreciable weight when it is collapsing into a supernova. So I am fairly confident that even in the far reaches of space, elements >115 don't exist. Yep, as a astrophysics student I concur. Even if they had short 1/2 lives, I suspect we'd detect the daughter nuclei? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdurg Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 But even the daughter nuclei have relatively short half-lives in the grand scheme of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest river-wind Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 118 was seen, but then no one could see it again, so it may not have been seen at all. it's like religion with fast-moving particles. 116 has been seen in the lab, though: http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Uuh/key.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdurg Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Yeah, the claim to have discovered element 118 has been retracted because the group that submitted the discovery realized that they misread their data. They were also unable to reproduce their results, so they have retracted all statements about the discovery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now