Artebian Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 When a particle is said to have "spin," does that mean it actually spins or is it simply an arbitrary label of a property like "charm"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 When a particle is said to have "spin," does that mean it actually spins or is it simply an arbitrary label of a property like "charm"? No, it's is not physically spinning, and no, this is not arbitrary. Spin is angular momentum, as the classical concept suggests, but it is intrinsic to the particle rather than from physical motion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 As swansont says, you should not think of a particle as a tiny spinning ball. The intrinsic spin does not have such a simple interpretation, but it is similar to angular momentum when you take special relativity into account - you could look up the Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector. The usual way to include spin in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is to simply 'bolt it on' to the theory - you then think of total angular momentum, which is the sum of the orbital angular momentum and the spin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artebian Posted September 13, 2016 Author Share Posted September 13, 2016 Interesting. I've got some reading to do on angular momentum, Pauli-Lubanski, etc. Thank you for the answers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now