B. John Jones Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 I don't understandInstead of just one infinite universe, I think that is an infinitely small fraction of existence. An analogy that makes sense to me is that instead of just having just one infinity such as infinite apples- that infinty is just one of infinite infinities which they themselves are just one of infinite infinities and so on. I suppose I am very affected by my religious standpoint of a perfect infinite God, I just feel like this theory is basically the past possible existence because it is the most infinite it can be. Hence ultimate infinity. In fact I think creation it self is just one action of God and is one of infinite and you get the idea - I hope The universe appears to be expanding, but is not. It's being broken down into infinitely smaller parts. In the end certain parts will be mended and perfected. Others will continue their destruction (death). -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memammal Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 The universe appears to be expanding, but is not. It's being broken down into infinitely smaller parts. In the end certain parts will be mended and perfected. Others will continue their destruction (death). I notice that these four statements went by unchallenged. B. John Jones, can you substantiate what you presented as "factual" statements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 The universe appears to be expanding, but is not. It's being broken down into infinitely smaller parts. In the end certain parts will be mended and perfected. Others will continue their destruction (death). Did someone rename this to "Random Nonsense Forums" while I was away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. John Jones Posted June 28, 2016 Author Share Posted June 28, 2016 (edited) I notice that these four statements went by unchallenged. B. John Jones, can you substantiate what you presented as "factual" statements? Is it a fact that if you're not careful when striking a nail with a hammer eventually you'll get hurt? I couldn't substantiate that nor could you, unless you're so foolish as to prove it. If you would look with as much respect to the stellar regions as to the microscopic regions and as to the natural order, you would acknowledge that matter decays because that's the course nature takes. I don't prove it to state it as fact, because it is indeed fact. Yet I will offer the comparison of the stellar regions to decaying matter. Without gravity, matter would decay outward, as the "satellites" do in the atmospheres. Did someone rename this to "Random Nonsense Forums" while I was away? If something explodes, it acts in the same form of the appearance of the universe, outward, but gravity restrains it and it comes to rest. Explosion is comparable to decay. Correct me if I'm wrong, but decaying matter is simply the breaking down of molecules, correct? It's the same thing at a macro-particular/macro-molecular level with gravity removed. The universe is breaking down. Edited June 28, 2016 by B. John Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 "Did someone rename this to "Random Nonsense Forums" while I was away?" If something explodes, it acts in the same form of the appearance of the universe, outward, but gravity restrains it and it comes to rest. Explosion is comparable to decay. Correct me if I'm wrong, but decaying matter is simply the breaking down of molecules, correct? It's the same thing at a macro-particular/macro-molecular level with gravity removed. The universe is breaking down. I'll take that as a "yes". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memammal Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 (edited) Goodness me. A quick Google search confirmed my suspicion...this BS science is being promulgated on a number of pro-religious websites. B. John Jones, you stated that the universe is in fact not expanding (?) while some parts will be "mended and perfected" and others not (?) And then you elaborated on it in this manner: Yet I will offer the comparison of the stellar regions to decaying matter. Without gravity, matter would decay outward, as the "satellites" do in the atmospheres. Plus the strange section that Strange copied above. Seriously dude, if you really want to learn something useful you can start by reading this article entitled Future of an expanding universe. Chances are good that it is slightly more accurate than what you have been reading in your selected sources elsewhere on the internet or in the Book of Revelation. One day soon we need to discuss the science behind that rainbow in your avatar as well. Edited June 28, 2016 by Memammal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts