Jump to content

Magnetism - where does it's energy come from?


Recommended Posts

I was playing around with a permanent magnet today and the thought suddenly struck me: There is an energy field here. Surely that must mean that it is using energy to maintain that field. But the field strength of a magnet doesn't decrease, does it? Whence, then, comes the continuous flow of energy that powers the field?

Edited by Old Guy In Stanton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was playing around with a permanent magnet today and the thought suddenly struck me: There is an energy field here. Surely that must mean that it is using energy to maintain that field. But the field strength of a magnet doesn't decrease, does it? Whence, then, comes the continuous flow of energy that powers the field?

 

In this video, showing the basic electromagnetic induction, source of energy, initial acceleration comes from gravity:

See how slowly magnet is passing through Copper pipe, in the second part of video.

It's three-four times as long as not magnetized piece of Bronze.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you stop the current flow in an electromagnet, the magnetic field collapses. Energy flow - input of energy from somewhere - is therefore obviously necessary for an electromagnet. So is the magnetism of an electromagnet somehow different in kind (principle, operation) than the magnetism of a permanent magnet? If not, then where does the energy flow come from in a permanent magnet?

 

I am very sorry if I am sounding obtuse here, but this simply does not made sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is because of the resistance of the electromagnet: you need to supply energy to keep the current flowing. That energy is dissipated as heat. If you use a superconducting coil, then it requires almost no energy to maintain the magnetic field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What

 

That is because of the resistance of the electromagnet: you need to supply energy to keep the current flowing. That energy is dissipated as heat. If you use a superconducting coil, then it requires almost no energy to maintain the magnetic field.

What's happening at the atomic level with the two types? What is it about magnetic materials, atomically, that keeps them that way vs electromagnets?

Edited by StringJunky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What

 

What's happening at the atomic level with the two types? What is it about magnetic materials, atomically, that keeps them that way vs electromagnets?

 

 

Permanent magnet elements have unpaired electrons, so their magnetic field contributions don't cancel, and they are in a solid with a physical structure that lets the fields add together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Permanent magnet elements have unpaired electrons, so their magnetic field contributions don't cancel, and they are in a solid with a physical structure that lets the fields add together.

I forgot about the unpaired electrons. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.