Jump to content

Fossil use in calibrating molecular dating


Recommended Posts

When DNA/RNA is used to date common ancestors I understand that fossils are needed for calibration since rates of mutation vary considerably. I know fossils can normally be dated accurately but I don't understand how they help. If a fossil is found that resembles what the common ancestor must have been like I assume it cannot be known for sure if it came before or after the split in evolutionary lines, so I don't see that that helps.

Can anyone explain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A known common ancestor represents an "at least" bracket for the age of a node - as in the clade had to be in existence by at least this long ago. However, of course the origin of the clade could have occurred before the fossil, so it doesn't represent a hard lower bound for the age of the node. As a result, a fossil calibration generally allows you to put a log normal prior distribution around the node for age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.