Ant Sinclair Posted October 29, 2014 Author Share Posted October 29, 2014 http://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field SwansonT; I'm not fully conversant with the Higgs Boson/Field but I've been studying it the last two days and believe it may be a candidate for this Wave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 http://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field SwansonT; I'm not fully conversant with the Higgs Boson/Field but I've been studying it the last two days and believe it may be a candidate for this Wave. Why the given frequency of the wave in the Higg's field and how can you account for your superluminal speed? You know that the Higg's is a scalar field, you know what the gauge invariant form of the action is, you can work out equations of motion. You need to show that you can have a superluminal wave. I think you will not be able to show this as the theory is relativistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant Sinclair Posted October 29, 2014 Author Share Posted October 29, 2014 ajb I'm not certain yet(there maybe other factors to the wave) but the Higgs fits the Energy Constants Model. When you read that scientists believe its the Higgs Particle that realises mass in atoms, then if the energy flow through quark formations is the wave of the higgs boson, this is what attracts the different type of gluons and is the energy in the circuit. Looking back at the models interpretation of the water molecule I THINK the reason that steam rises up is because of the "extra" local energy pulling the quark bonds "tight". This tight formation would have a too large wave compression pressure in the quark-centres expelling neutrally-attracted gluons and hence losing mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I would suggest this article on the Higgs its a 2014 review on the Higgs sector. Including numerous related models. http://www.google.ca/url?q=http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2013-rev-higgs-boson.pdf&sa=U&ei=275RVISPJsyuyATPkoL4DA&ved=0CAsQFjAA&sig2=teCad_WamYVBYYFp58KqGA&usg=AFQjCNG-I9NqClw2oId0WdmvIBEHzBc92g Be forwarned though its 198 pages technical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 http://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field SwansonT; I'm not fully conversant with the Higgs Boson/Field but I've been studying it the last two days and believe it may be a candidate for this Wave. How does a resonance at ~126 GeV get you a ~208 GHz wave? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidivad Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 i think ant is correct to a degree. the big bang expanded faster than the speed of light. and indeed there is a background noise at 208ghz. as well as the entire spectrum. and regardless of the fact that you cannot transmit information beyond the speed of light, the wave that ensued IS the amount of energy we have today. in other words it is equal my suggestion is that he sees the idea of how it works and can at least prove a signal (not superluminal). regardles of whether a resulting 208 ghz wave is the cause of matter accumulation, he gets the idea to an extent. now he must prove that it is not a 208 ghz wave. he must prove himself wrong to get the real answer. matter did start accumulating at a particular frequency. he is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 the big bang expanded faster than the speed of light. <sigh> Expansion isn't a speed. The speed depends on the distance between two points. There are, and always have bee,n points that are sufficiently far apart that their speed of separation is faster than light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidivad Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 (edited) absolutely. you are correct would you argue that it is an apparent wave? Edited October 30, 2014 by davidivad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 and indeed there is a background noise at 208ghz. as well as the entire spectrum. "the bond +/- gluons around quarks [ still spinning from the 208.33ghz super-luminal wave]" doesn't sound like a claim about background noise to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidivad Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 yes, we are still working on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 (edited) According to these papers its a CMB signal http://www.google.ca/url?q=http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0004357&sa=U&ei=2KZSVNbOHpKjyASz5oJg&ved=0CBEQFjAD&sig2=CFXkfa0OHG6zDguP8xJIqg&usg=AFQjCNFUnrJnFcFnqCY_HZehXPSbi36q8g It is the instrinsic CMB fluctuation signal http://www.google.ca/url?q=http://www.itp.kit.edu/~ertl/Hauptseminar/papers/Bernardis_a_flat_universe_from_high_resolution_maps_of_the_cosmic_microwave_background_radiation.pdf&sa=U&ei=Qa5SVK_UDIOwyAThqoLABA&ved=0CA0QFjAB&sig2=Hlg8SYcp3cFoWtlxgdB2tw&usg=AFQjCNE8pG0CQz_jHhQfwP0UPaFhKsYHwg The second paper discusses its significance as its the multipole [latex]l_{peak}[/latex]. Which has applications in determinig the universes density to detrmine our universes geometry. Its also a supportive piece of evidence for inflation and a flat universe. Along with the other signals from the CMB power spectrum and related accoustic oscillations I must admit researching this signal on its importance to cosmology was a good suggestion by the OP. Well done Edited October 30, 2014 by Mordred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidivad Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 i agree mordred. thanks for the information. i find this thread shows collaboration which is a key ingredient of science beyond simple argumentation (it does work). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant Sinclair Posted September 4, 2015 Author Share Posted September 4, 2015 AS FROM THIS MOMENT I LOCK THIS THREAD! ANY DRAWINGS ON THIS THREAD ARE MY PERSONAL WORKS AND I DO NOT AUTHORISE THEIR USE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM! !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts