Jump to content

SETI@Home


Recommended Posts

Chances of discovering ETs are quite low and the possible scientific effect is not likely to be immediate since any communication with other life species is limited by the speed of light. On the other hand Einstein@Home looks for possible gravitational wave sources as the last, still unverified consequence of GR. Even if such waves haven't been discovered yet, the project is quite successful in finding radio pulsars which is still quite a significant result.

Edited by pavelcherepan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why idle? I just received 204.68 Cobblestones of computation with an average of 16.04 Cobblestones. I am a new person to this project. How about you, Mr. EdEarl?


Chances of discovering ETs are quite low and the possible scientific effect is not likely to be immediate since any communication with other life species is limited by the speed of light. On the other hand Einstein@Home looks for possible gravitational wave sources as the last, still unverified consequence of GR. Even if such waves haven't been discovered yet, the project is quite successful in finding radio pulsars which is still quite a significant result.

 

Ok, that is your opinion. I tried Einstein@Home before but the deadlines are too short if compared to SETI@home. i won`t have the opportunity to turn on my computer everyday.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why idle? I just received 204.68 Cobblestones of computation with an average of 16.04 Cobblestones. I am a new person to this project. How about you, Mr. EdEarl?

My computer is always on, I have about 1.2M work done and 3740 average. SETI is a long shot, but with better and better radio telescopes the odds increase. Nonetheless, I think the odds of a hi tech civilization besides us in the Milky Way are long. The universe is a dangerous place, and Earth has already experiences several mass extinctions. It's only a matter of time before another occurs, and we are fragile and vulnerable. There's a good chance we will not become space travelers before the next extinction, and I all high tech civilizations face the same difficulties.

Edited by EdEarl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Having just reached the midway point of Jared Diamond's excellent (and endlessly thought-provoking) "Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive", I too am struck by the fragility (in this instance) of humankind-based civilisations. Personally, I suspect that even if other high-tech civilisations do "currently" exist elsewhere in our Galaxy, we all may remain unknowable to each other, given the sheer immensity of cosmic distances, plus a stern reading of the Drake Equation. On the other hand, we Earthlings could be analogous to those Easter Islanders - that is, we are a relatively civilised species, doomed not only as a result of all the unhappy consequences that flow from our isolation, but also in part because our seclusion has rendered us insensitive to the existence of other (rather more highly) advanced civilisations, some of whom, unbeknownst to us, may have already established worthwhile - even trade-based? - communications with each other. . . though, I realise this is straying into wish-fulfilment territory. Also, it's worth keeping in mind that our projections about any advanced alien civilisations, and eventual ability to communicate with them, may be hamstrung by our present lack of understanding regarding the laws of physics. For all we know, we could be, relatively speaking, still at the Ptolemaic stage in our grasp of scientific knowledge; or as Arthur C Clarke once observed, we are endeavouring to make contact with super-advanced extraterrestrials with the modern equivalents of drumbeats or smoke signals. Still, I believe the attempt should be made, perilous though it might end up being for a whole variety of reasons. But then, nothing ventured, nothing gained. . . a fundamental law of nature?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I should have qualified my final throwaway remark by rephrasing it as "living nature" instead of just "nature". One may still consider whether it is relevant to the above discussion. I did so myself, hence my tagging it with a question mark. Nevertheless, I still lean towards the adage "nothing ventured, nothing gained" serving as a convenient shorthand for the workings of Darwinian evolution. I could expand upon this point, but feel that in doing so would further increase the risk of my wandering away from the main themes contained in this thread and/or boring everyone rigid by stating the obvious, which is the sin of sins. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now 920.74 and 51.58 average. Well, could you further clarify your meaning, GeeKay. Sorry, I still couldn`t get your idea. I am living in Malaysia and currently 15 years old. You know, English is my second language. Maybe you can help in using simple language. Thanks and sorry for asking you to do extra job. Really sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Nicholas, you should really consider reading up on Darwinian natural selection - assuming, of course, you haven't already? It is at present the only known mechanism that offers a thoroughgoing description of how living organisms thrive and evolve (and become extinct) over time. You won't go far wrong with born explainers like Richard Dawkins or Steve Jones. For starters just google their names. . . Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible that most ETs have calculated that sending out, say, a terawatt of 'I am here' signals for a million years would give them a 50% chance of contacting one other ET civilisation.

 

They may not be advanced enough to take the long view.

 

:):(

Edited by Carrock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I know Darwinian Natural Selection, but I don`t know how you are going to relate it with your explanation. Maybe you can clarify it?"

 

Yes, that's relatively simple: although we Homo sapiens cannot make any direct comparisons, other than studying ourselves in this respect, it would appear that inquisitiveness is a normal component of intelligence. In this thread's context, inquisitiveness = a desire by intelligent extraterrestrials to make contact with other intelligent species. . . ourselves, for instance? Hope that clarifies things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Yes, that's relatively simple: although we Homo sapiens cannot make any direct comparisons, other than studying ourselves in this respect, it would appear that inquisitiveness is a normal component of intelligence. In this thread's context, inquisitiveness = a desire by intelligent extraterrestrials to make contact with other intelligent species. . . ourselves, for instance? Hope that clarifies things.

 

I get your sentence meaning but not the overall meaning. You say maybe ETs would like to contact us, for instance. Ok, so what is your next idea, and the main theme? Do you support searching ETs or you have other meanings? Good English but this means I couldn`t really understand your message. Sorry for interuptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yes, I do support the SETI programme - though I am aware of its inherent dangers (ref. Stephen Hawking). We don't know for sure if an intelligent species has to first get through an 'ethical' bottleneck in order to become a space-faring species. The SF novels by Larry Niven are instructive here. Unlikely though it might be in actuality, it's just possible to conceive of an alien species with 25th century space technology and the morality of The Beano (a British children's comic). Personally, I'm inclined towards the view aired by Frank Zappa, who when asked a related question, responded by saying that he considered the universe to be composed mostly of stupidity. It's the less 'stupid' parts we're discussing here, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.