zorro Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 (edited) Question: Is surface tension holding the photosphere together more than the Gravitational fields ??? Judging by the way Solar storms rip thru the Photosphere then contracting back to reform, it seems that the Photosphere is more in surface tension not gravitational compression. http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/feature1.shtml Storm watching: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91H4qgFCauQ zorro Edited August 15, 2013 by zorro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 That site is not a reputable source. Wal Thornhill is an electric universe crank. For a start he would flatly contradict that stars are nuclear fusion powered - as solar fusion was the base of two of your recent threads this could cause a little bit of a contradiction. What that site says is only really evidence for what Wal Thornhill reckons ... There are hundreds of good sites out there dealing with physics and cosmology - try Nasa for a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorro Posted August 15, 2013 Author Share Posted August 15, 2013 That site is not a reputable source. Wal Thornhill is an electric universe crank. For a start he would flatly contradict that stars are nuclear fusion powered - as solar fusion was the base of two of your recent threads this could cause a little bit of a contradiction. What that site says is only really evidence for what Wal Thornhill reckons ... There are hundreds of good sites out there dealing with physics and cosmology - try Nasa for a start. Thanx Imatfaal, I deleted it I mostly chose it for the pictogram. zorro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorro Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 (edited) That site is not a reputable source. Wal Thornhill is an electric universe crank. For a start he would flatly contradict that stars are nuclear fusion powered - as solar fusion was the base of two of your recent threads this could cause a little bit of a contradiction. What that site says is only really evidence for what Wal Thornhill reckons ... Test of multiquote zz Thanx Imatfaal, I deleted it I mostly chose it for the pictogram. zorro Test of multiquote wxx ----- parts deleted. .. zorro ----- There are hundreds of good sites out there dealing with physics and cosmology - try Nasa for a start. Test of inter aranging reply Thanx Imatfaal, I deleted it I mostly chose it for the pictogram. zorro Testing multiquote thanx zorro note very clumsy system in member quote arranging. .............................................................. Testing double insert swipe and dangles My thought is that we need a Fusion reactor with processes similar to the Photosphere of the Sun where temps are only 7,000 dK. Edited August 16, 2013 by zorro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 My thought is that we need a Fusion reactor with processes similar to the Photosphere of the Sun where temps are only 7,000 dK. ! Moderator Note Your previous threads on this have been closed. This one remained open because you mentioned surface tension in the OP and not fusion. If you discuss fusion in the photosphere again, this too shall be closed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorro Posted August 17, 2013 Author Share Posted August 17, 2013 (edited) Mod Ok close it . Fusion / Fusion containment is a separate subject particularly in the Photosphere. I use this thread as trash to try the clumsy Multi Quote and iPhone commands. Zorro Test photo insertion on iPhone. Edited August 17, 2013 by zorro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts