Jump to content

about a question of gravitional acceleration


nghosh@india

Recommended Posts

actually it is the formula of variation of g with altitude,mr.swansot

 

But where is it from? I have tried to derive it - and I can only get there if I ignore higher orders of h/R and maddeningly drop a value of 2Rh. This might make sense when h is incredibly small compared to R - but you are positing "what if h is infinite!". In that case of h being large or even of the same order as R you need to rework the equation without the ignoring of orders of h/R and massive simplifications.

 

In reality it is an approximation that works for human scale structure on the earth - but not for large scale changes in height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually it is the formula of variation of g with altitude,mr.swansot

 

Variation with altitude is a specific application of a more general equation, in this case, Newton's law of gravitation. As imatfaal has said, it has to come from somewhere. When you have an equation in physics, you need to know what assumptions went into the derivation, because that has implications on the limits of applicability of the equation.

 

You can derive your equation by looking at the ratio of two values of g at a separation of h, and do a binomial expansion. But (again, as imatfaal has said) to get that particular equation, you have to make an assumption about the value of h/R in order to truncate the series and ignore the higher-order terms — you have to assume that h << R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the derivation of that equation probably went something like this: start with the g-value on Earth's surface:

 

[math]g=\frac{GM}{R^2}[/math]

 

Now define g' as the g-value at a height h above the Earth's surface:

 

[math]g'=\frac{GM}{(R+h)^2}=\frac{GM}{R^2} \left (1+\frac{h^2}{R^2}+\frac{2h}{R} \right )^{-1}=g \left (1+\frac{h^2}{R^2}+\frac{2h}{R} \right )^{-1}[/math]

 

Now do a binomial expansion to get:

 

[math]g'=g \left (1-\left (\frac{h^2}{R^2}+\frac{2h}{R} \right )+\left ( \frac{h^2}{R^2}+\frac{2h}{R} \right )^2 - \left ( \frac{h^2}{R^2}+\frac{2h}{R} \right )^3 + ... \right )[/math]

 

Now if we make the assumption that h<<R, (h is very small compared to R) then terms with higher powers of (h/R) are essentially zero. This makes all terms in our expansion go to zero, except:

 

[math]g'\approx g \left (1-\frac{2h}{R} \right )[/math]

 

If you make h large compared to R, then the simplifying assumption we used no longer holds. In other words, the approximation fails when h becomes large. So h=infinity is definitely not going to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.