DarkStar8 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 The Universe is expanding, but if we turn the clock back and energy is drawn back into the void so that that 13.7billion years ago the universe came from nothing. We could then have a continuously expanding universe which has no beginning. Mass, energy continuously emerging from the void as the universe expands... You see the Big Bang theory in its current form with specific moment of creation can not explain the following... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130111092539.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpha2cen Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Acccording to my calculation, the size of universe at that time is about 2/3 of it in the present. Model for calculation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantheory Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 (edited) yes, this observation is just one of the very numberous problems since the inception of the BB model. Continuos observational surprises, now requiring dark matter, dark energy, dark flow, and often contradicting obervations such as this one seems to be. Edited January 12, 2013 by pantheory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 (edited) You see the Big Bang theory in its current form with specific moment of creation can not explain the following... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130111092539.htm Perhaps the minimum size or piece of the universe scientists use to determine isotropy and homogeneity is too small. Our Observable Universe is but one small piece in a much larger picture and any calculations or observations concerning the BB only relate to our OU.so that quasar group is probably not unique in the totality of the universe. Edited January 12, 2013 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkStar8 Posted January 12, 2013 Author Share Posted January 12, 2013 So what is the largest structured group of quasars or the highest red shift Galaxy we can observe before we say hang on a minute we need more time than 13.7billion years. Nassim Haramein points out that an expanding universe on the large scale must be contracting on the small scale... Equal and opposite reaction. Energy in the vacuum?.. Perhaps Sir Fred Hoyle wasn't totally wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantheory Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Yeah, after the James Webb has been up for just a few years, I expect we will again hear more of the ideas and theories of Fred Hoyle Then I expect cosmology models of a much older universe will again be discussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpha2cen Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 If the measured distance is exact, we will find another X-rays(Roentgen rays) in the astronomy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now