Jump to content

The reynolds number


Leni k

Recommended Posts

The classically defined Reynolds number shouldn't ever be negative. [math]\textrm{Re} = \frac{vl \rho}{\mu}[/math] none of these terms can be negative, l is a characteristic length, v is a characteristic velocity, rho is the density, mu is the viscosity.

 

Now, that said, there are lots of times problem-specific Reynolds numbers are defined. e.g. ones for flow through a packed bed, or as Ophiolite above mentions, ones for non-Newtonian fluids. Now, that said, the specifics about the defined Re will be needed for how to correctly interpret it.

 

I will admit, I've never seen a negative one, unless someone naively just puts in a negative velocity. But, if they do that, they really are losing the meaning behind what the ratio is supposed to mean in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way that I see a Reynolds number can become negative, is when the velocity or relevant length are negative. But that just means that whoever was measuring it, started measuring from the wrong side smile.png

 

Never seen a negative Re number before.

 

Leni, for more feedback it is probably a good idea to link to the paper, or give the reference. (We know it might not be freely available).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.