Jump to content

Does anyone know how to isolate the light isotopes of mercury?


Mosheh Thezion

Recommended Posts

ok.. simple question... I am asking for help.

does anyone know how to isolate, EASILY.. CHEAPLY.. the isotopes of mercury???

I seek and desire Hg 196... which naturally.. is .15% of all naturally occuring mercury.

 

Any thoughts???

 

-Mosheh Thezion

 

 

Oh, what do you need it for. How come Hg 196. Is it radioactive lol.

 

 

My input would be the process would cost millions, certainly not cheap and takes weeks, minimum.

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, what do you need it for. How come Hg 196. Is it radioactive lol.

 

 

My input would be the process would cost millions, certainly not cheap and takes weeks, minimum.

 

:lol:

 

 

Radioactive mercury, that sounds particularly nasty as elements go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Surprisingly, a patent by CEA tells a method:

Mix some mercury into a flow of oxygen and butadiene, irradiate by a mercury lamp depleted of the isotope 196, this separates the isotope 196 in the flow.

 

Which might be a variant of the laser method proposed for uranium enrichment...

 

I just wonder how the hell the ultra-faint optical frequency shift by the neutrons shall change light absorption by mercury in th gas mixture. All gases - including in the lamp - must be at a damned low pressure, or line widening due to the short mean free path will let all lines overlap.

 

Edit :

Webster and Zare, "Photochemical Isotope Separation of 196 Hg by Reaction with Hydrogen Halides" J. Phys. Chem. 85, 1302 (1981)

tells 10mm Hg, a mystery for me. Maybe a multi-step separation.

 

Next interrogation: how much energy does it take per isolated atom? In that patent, I believe to understand every mercury atom is excited by inefficient optical means just to extract the 0.15% isotope, which is nearly as inefficient as mass spectroscopy. Present methods seek to expend less than one ionization energy per isolated atom, which is an advantage of diffusion and centrifugation over mass spectroscopy.

 

Finally, Mosheh Thezion, could you explain us this interest in 196Hg? CEA paid a patent for it, so it must have some use, beyond the mere availability of mercury lamps?

 

Did someone finally find a neutron multiplicator that is less polluting than lead? It would be nice, since lead spallation makes D-T fusion reactors as polluting as uranium fission.

 

Or do you want to build lamps? From http://www.patentgen...nt/5205913.html :

"U.S. Pat. No. 4,379,252, the advantages of utilizing higher than normal levels of .sup.196 Hg in the Hg added to fluorescent lamps are described and include unexpectedly high efficiency gains in light output."

"The drawback of using this isotope lies in its high cost. For example, using conventional enrichment techniques, mercury which has been enhanced to contain about 35% of the .sup.196 Hg isotope can cost about $500 per milligram."

Which deepens the mystery for me.

 

Well, if 196Hg radiates light so much better, you can probably build a lamp and collect in it the Hg fraction that is already de-excited. Or the one that is less prone to non-radiative de-excitation.

 

Will you tell us? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.