# Unifying Theory Complete By Israel Kim

## Recommended Posts

##### Share on other sites

Israel - here is the wikipedia page with 5 proofs that pi is irrational. that means you can never "measure it to the fullness of the pi number" (I think that's how you phrase it). There is no fullness, complete, or finished pi; it carries on regardless, and this has been proved.

To inflate a tetrahedron (that's a four-sided shape each of which is a equilateral triangle) you must distort it; that means that measurements of length and angle will not remain the same . I guess it would also depend on where you drew the line.

##### Share on other sites

Yes primate, what you say is taken to effect.. yet the co efficent is consistent and remains so, give me a more rational source other that wikipedia, in the first come first serve basis of that encyclopedia source. and I did not say a tetrahedron

Israel - here is the wikipedia page with 5 proofs that pi is irrational. that means you can never "measure it to the fullness of the pi number" (I think that's how you phrase it). There is no fullness, complete, or finished pi; it carries on regardless, and this has been proved.

To inflate a tetrahedron (that's a four-sided shape each of which is a equilateral triangle) you must distort it; that means that measurements of length and angle will not remain the same . I guess it would also depend on where you drew the line.

and further you use the oracle of wikipedia? please give me a more diffinative source, anyone testify to the claim I have made that is correct? Please enter your comment otherwise I will consider it completely sound and not irrational. Plus I have given 4 point intro, body, apogee, and end. to the disernment to the mathmatics involved to it soundness that can not be argued with. In another words the story is complete. And please listen to the soundness of the recording before you choose to make a fool out of me. And did I not mention the equator to the equation that was presented? Don't think your cognitive skills to comprehend is up to par. When you say it a irrational when it's without mention that it's a evolving form such as is the perfect circle that is in context to constant state of flux. Please listen to the recording again. Thank you come again.

Yes primate, what you say is taken to effect.. yet the co efficent is consistent and remains so

Edited by IsraelUnoone
##### Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations since this is just promotion of your own hypothesis.

Also:

Please start calling people by their actual user name.
##### Share on other sites

How about some text... and pictures... so i do not have to listen to a sound file???

##### Share on other sites

just listen

How about some text... and pictures... so i do not have to listen to a sound file???

##### Share on other sites

eh no.... any sound file... can be made into text.... and read quickly... instead of waiting for you to finish speaking...

I mean seriously... it must come in text form... so it can be broken down for value.

if you... do not write it down... that would require than I DO IT FOR YOU.... AND THAT.... is not anyway to explain such a thing.

##### Share on other sites

This is actually not a title that I came up with and is not mere speculation, this title derives from Stephen Hawkins and his quest is being added to. So politely please put this topic in the correct section of this site. Thank you

Actually all mathmathical formulas could derive from this. Also in application we can see that it could make what people popularly know from back to the future of the flux compassitor. Now time travel aside, this model can hold and deliver power and energy to more than a jigawat without complications and sucessfully be a source of power as well. Futhermore, the chaos theory is supported in this because of the constant state of flux. What we see is that the chaos theory is support by the agnknowledgement of not using the butterfly as an example, rather e=mc2. Energy can not be created or destroyed. In this a butterfly harness and utilize energy and chaos theory as a title is not specific, when the constant of such is shown through this of e=mc2. We have also the constant state of flux that is incorperated with the model I have present in lanugage such as english. One can say that this form of language is chaotic yet follow order and perceived order to be able to understand and behold. Nothing is without order. For example Hip Hop and the rhyme used are fragmented but to the able listener is clear when the fragment are put in order to the explaination of the artist. In the same way to those who do not listen hip hop will be in view of what seems to be chaotic form or prose. As poetry has always been a subject to interputation and that being chaotic, yet the proses of such is a organised form that would speak to each and to his or her own interputation until the artist if so be would explain the content to the mystery unraveled.

Empress of Everything - Once the constant state of flux is found, all things are considered in theory and law.

!

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations since this is just promotion of your own hypothesis.

Also:

Please start calling people by their actual user name.

Edited by IsraelUnoone
##### Share on other sites

I repeat:

And this thread is staying exactly where it is, which happens to be exactly where it belongs.

##### Share on other sites

To

imatfaal forgive me for calling you primate, will be more careful next time to acknowledge your identity

Yes primate, what you say is taken to effect.. yet the co efficent is consistent and remains so, give me a more rational source other that wikipedia, in the first come first serve basis of that encyclopedia source. and I did not say a tetrahedron

and further you use the oracle of wikipedia? please give me a more diffinative source, anyone testify to the claim I have made that is correct? Please enter your comment otherwise I will consider it completely sound and not irrational. Plus I have given 4 point intro, body, apogee, and end. to the disernment to the mathmatics involved to it soundness that can not be argued with. In another words the story is complete. And please listen to the soundness of the recording before you choose to make a fool out of me. And did I not mention the equator to the equation that was presented? When you say it a irrational when it's without mention that it's a evolving form such as is the perfect circle that is in context to constant state of flux. Please listen to the recording again. Thank you come again.

Edited by IsraelUnoone
##### Share on other sites

How many watts is a jiggawatt? You claimed it can take power up to a jiggawatt!

You also claim to be able to derive every mathematical formula from your work. I call BS, pony up and start deriving.

Oh, you are also BS'ing about "Stephen Hawkins". It's Stephen Hawking you genius. You didn't even bother to google the spelling.

Why should I believe you have a unified theory of...whatever it's supposed to be relevant too when you can't even use standard units, use LaTeX, or spell the names of famous physicists?

I think you are just making crap up honestly. My young cousin actually did better science in his fifth grade science fair project. Really!

##### Share on other sites

I stopped listening when you got to the part where you talked about "the curvature of a triangle which can be triangulated". There is only so much babble one can absorb at one sitting.

Israel, here is some advice. I think it is good advice. (Therefore, based on you posts here and your audio file I expect you to ignore it.)

Write up your conecpt so people can read it. Reading is a more efficient method of absorbing this type of information since it allows for rapid return to earlier points in the text as often as required.

It also will require you to structure your thesis more carefully, which in turn will make it more comprehensible.

You would also be well advised to define your terms rigorously. At the moment what you are saying comes across as word salad.

##### Share on other sites

How many watts is a jiggawatt? You claimed it can take power up to a jiggawatt!

You also claim to be able to derive every mathematical formula from your work. I call BS, pony up and start deriving.

Oh, you are also BS'ing about "Stephen Hawkins". It's Stephen Hawking you genius. You didn't even bother to google the spelling.

Why should I believe you have a unified theory of...whatever it's supposed to be relevant too when you can't even use standard units, use LaTeX, or spell the names of famous physicists?

I think you are just making crap up honestly. My young cousin actually did better science in his fifth grade science fair project. Really!

pretty aggresive language. "you genius" "BSing"

Did he really hurt your confidance. Was he blocking your road back home to your imaginary cousin that you have to wage war.

##### Share on other sites

pretty aggresive language. "you genius" "BSing"

Did he really hurt your confidance. Was he blocking your road back home to your imaginary cousin that you have to wage war.

Alright.

The language I used in the post you quoted was a bit on the harsh side and for that I apologize to IsraelUnoone, you, and to other readers who were offended by it. That was out of line on my part.

However I stand by the content of my post and still maintain that the OP is baseless speculation.

##### Share on other sites

• 4 weeks later...

using radio wave to create a circle with water that has been synthsized with gold to evaporate or simply using gold with radio wave, it can make a perfect disk and in that a perfect circle that will enable teleporation, and reciever.

In conjuction to using the break down of the geometric sphere we make a larger geometric orbit that would lend to the same structure in unison. This creates a energy field using this form to function in conjunction with the receiver. The earth already is a induction coil already existant in the molten center that is in earth as the earth is in orbit to the sun and the moon to earth with energy already in air as we breath it enable life and is proof of it being energy as conductor of this with it's atomic state.

This means free energy for the whole earth and no use for oil for war profit capitalist system in perversion to take rather to receive.

The spirit of the radio. Radio messiah represents the word that created a song of all songs. It is here.

Edited by IsraelUnoone
##### Share on other sites

This is bringing down the tone of the Speculations forum - not an easy thing to do.

##### Share on other sites

using radio wave to create a circle with water that has been synthsized with gold to evaporate or simply using gold with radio wave, it can make a perfect disk and in that a perfect circle that will enable teleporation, and reciever.

In conjuction to using the break down of the geometric sphere we make a larger geometric orbit that would lend to the same structure in unison. This creates a energy field using this form to function in conjunction with the receiver. The earth already is a induction coil already existant in the molten center that is in earth as the earth is in orbit to the sun and the moon to earth with energy already in air as we breath it enable life and is proof of it being energy as conductor of this with it's atomic state.

This means free energy for the whole earth and no use for oil for war profit capitalist system in perversion to take rather to receive.

The spirit of the radio. Radio messiah represents the word that created a song of all songs. It is here.

That's probably the most remarkable, and least comprehensible bit of word salad I have seen in a while.

On the other hand, the last line gives me an excuse to remind people of this, which is one of my favourite pieces of music.

##### Share on other sites

a 4 part equalateral pyramid of a trigonomic equation that would in use of a cofficent be rendered to sphere with the latitude being formed to the relation of pi. then deflated by using the same method then the arc of pi is captured in a 4 part equation to the trigonomic form. then the use of pythagorus theorem is used in a trigonomic form in the negitative space for a elipical co efficent then rendering what is similar to a atom structure that would soon bond to another gravitational pull of another atom. This would mean that the equation that would render to the form that would be pi in a constant state of flux would render to a geographical location of a digit to a mathmathical formula. This in essence means that quantum physics is no longer a science.

With the negitative space that is one in this structure the structure of the universe as the relativity time and space light speed formula is put in place to the effect of the pi and the time and space rendered to a model in application to the formula would end up with what is a order of all creation.

As a king would be represented in this equation that would be the star of David.

The potent of all creation to come like a ballon to all things of the creator spoken to existence, is also the blackhole explained in the consuming of that creation to what is said in revelations as be hot or cold if your lukewarm you will be spat out. Every action has a reaction. Yet it further states in the word, that God is the center meaning that the very center of creation is the center to the break down of what we see as a chemistry distilation flask. In 3 parts God. Father, Son, Holy spirit. To what we see as the basic of the properties on this earth. Plasma requires the solid, liquid, and gas state together to make such.

Edited by IsraelUnoone
##### Share on other sites

a 4 part equalateral pyramid of a trigonomic equation that would in use of a cofficent be rendered to sphere with the latitude being formed to the relation of pi. then deflated by using the same method then the arc of pi is captured in a 4 part equation to the trigonomic form. then the use of pythagorus theorem is used in a trigonomic form in the negitative space for a elipical co efficent then rendering what is similar to a atom structure that would soon bond to another gravitational pull of another atom. This would mean that the equation that would render to the form that would be pi in a constant state of flux would render to a geographical location of a digit to a mathmathical formula. This in essence means that quantum physics is no longer a science.

With the negitative space that is one in this structure the structure of the universe as the relativity time and space light speed formula is put in place to the effect of the pi and the time and space rendered to a model in application to the formula would end up with what is a order of all creation.

As a king would be represented in this equation that would be the star of David.

The potent of all creation to come like a ballon to all things of the creator spoken to existence, is also the blackhole explained in the consuming of that creation to what is said in revelations as be hot or cold if your lukewarm you will be spat out. Every action has a reaction. Yet it further states in the word, that God is the center meaning that the very center of creation is the center to the break down of what we see as a chemistry distilation flask. In 3 parts God. Father, Son, Holy spirit. To what we see as the basic of the properties on this earth. Plasma requires the solid, liquid, and gas state together to make such.

After reading your word salad sprinkled with terminology obtained from watching the Discovery Science channel and Back to the Future, I will have to refer you to rule 1 of the speculations forum:

Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.

I have to agree with Ophiolite:

This is bringing down the tone of the Speculations forum - not an easy thing to do.

Perhaps the Trash Can would be a better forum for this thread.

##### Share on other sites

Personally, I'm more worried by the sprinkling of theology than the stuff from the Discovery Channel.

This sort of thing "Yet it further states in the word, that God is the center meaning that the very center of creation is the center to the break down of what we see as a chemistry distilation flask. In 3 parts God. Father, Son, Holy spirit. To what we see as the basic of the properties on this earth." belongs in religion or as has already been suggested, the dump.

I can see one possible reason for keeping it: it serves as an example of how unhelpful it is to try to mix science and religion.

##### Share on other sites

After reading your word salad sprinkled with terminology obtained from watching the Discovery Science channel and Back to the Future, I will have to refer you to rule 1 of the speculations forum:

I have to agree with Ophiolite:

Perhaps the Trash Can would be a better forum for this thread.

which thread are you refering to to the posting that is also a part of the thread.

Modern and Theoretical Physics <- is it not one of these?

And furthermore, Daedelus... you know what happened to this character of your name, in false claim

Edited by IsraelUnoone
##### Share on other sites

Your idea does not count as a theory in the scientific sense.

Also your use of theology strongly suggests that it never will be a real theory.

So it's not in theoretical physics.

##### Share on other sites

which thread are you refering to to the posting that is also a part of the thread.

Modern and Theoretical Physics <- is it not one of these?

And furthermore, Daedelus... you know what happened to this character of your name, in false claim

and science is the observation of creation and creation to certain people is made by YHWH

Your idea does not count as a theory in the scientific sense.

Also your use of theology strongly suggests that it never will be a real theory.

So it's not in theoretical physics.

In this instance of what you wrote is based on theory of language as mine, and there fore is a theory being put into practice. Furthermore if you have any more positive addition to the thread other than discounting it and not giving proper credit due then it will not be taken to seriously by me and my peers.

Also theology was a hard basis of what the renassance scientist developed most of their attributed practice that still exist now. I suggest that your biggotry be weighed without false measure.

After reading your word salad sprinkled with terminology obtained from watching the Discovery Science channel and Back to the Future, I will have to refer you to rule 1 of the speculations forum:

I have to agree with Ophiolite:

Perhaps the Trash Can would be a better forum for this thread.

Just because you gave yourself titles in the same structure to the higherachy of, you think I should listen to you when the alpha numeric language would already speak of a formula that is perfectly scientificly sound.

##### Share on other sites

Personally, I'm more worried by the sprinkling of theology than the stuff from the Discovery Channel.

This sort of thing "Yet it further states in the word, that God is the center meaning that the very center of creation is the center to the break down of what we see as a chemistry distilation flask. In 3 parts God. Father, Son, Holy spirit. To what we see as the basic of the properties on this earth." belongs in religion or as has already been suggested, the dump.

I can see one possible reason for keeping it: it serves as an example of how unhelpful it is to try to mix science and religion.

Already we see you dismiss the character of a golden era such as various renassance that would incorperate science as an observation to the creators creation and having definitive value to the structural integrity of today's modern thinking that would prove such a hypothesis displayed in your words as a fail. Further the scared notion of laws and theories would be a place of disregarded once to a current pinninical such as the earth is flat to a sphere. Now in this instance we see that religion or better yet an institution that does not regard somethings important enough for further evaluation would be a non benefit such as also your comment vice versa. Suckatash

## Create an account

Register a new account