Guest Siientx Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 My theory is simple. Gravity is a layer that does not cover everything. Gravity is not around us at all. It is a thin layer that is placed between the border of the sky/clouds and space. When you are underneath the layer gravity is pushing on you, causing anything to go up to be pushed back down. Now when you are above the what i call 'Gravitonic Line' you are being pulled downward. PULL ___________ PUSH Comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed84c Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 That is increadibly niaive. This line also is irrelivant because the pull and the push are essentailly the same. I dont think trying to redesign general relativity around some form of earth blanket is a valuble use of your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubJunk Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 I don't think it's likely at all mate. Good on you for thinking outside the square though. My advice is that if you want to make a new theory, thoroughly learn the current/old theories first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted November 14, 2004 Share Posted November 14, 2004 Please don't post threads like this in the Peanut Gallery again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 please tell me this thread is a joke. how does your theory work on stars, galaxies, spacecraft, ect.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ophiolite Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Siientx, this could have been a useful contribution to gravitational theory at the time of the early Greeks. Today, I have to go with SubJunk and applaud you for thinking out side the box, and to echo his thoughts, that before you think outside the box it is best to know the exact dimensions, temperature, orientation, velocity, composition and history of the box! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ophiolite Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Siientx, this could have been a useful contribution to gravitational theory at the time of the early Greeks. Today, I have to go with SubJunk and applaud you for thinking out side the box, and to echo his thoughts, that before you think outside the box it is best to know the exact dimensions, temperature, orientation, velocity, composition and history of the box! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaAotS Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Time of the Early Greeks as in, not relevant for the present... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gib65 Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Not only do I think your theory is out to lunch, but it's not even internally consistent. How does gravity push on you if it is a thin layer above the atmosphere? That's just like saying my ceiling is keeping me on the ground by pushing on me even though it's not touching me. Same with being above the "gravitonic line" - how could it be pulling on you even if you were just an inch above it? If there's some kind of mysterious force emanating from it that does the pulling/pushing, how do you explain that? We've already got that without a gravitational-blanket, and it's what we call "gravity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 the two of you should probably take a look at the dates of the first six posts and the (nonexisting) heat of the debate that was going on back then to judge the relevance of this thread. To add something constructive: http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/necromancer.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad89 Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 You know, thinking in ways that are 'tangental' is the key to finding out new information. Look at Einstein, he was mocked for his thoughts, yet look at them now. But I do have to say, the theory you made is kind of a bit too outside the box. To think of gravity as something in the Earths atmosphere is like saying nowadays that the Earth is the center of the solar system! You should pursue ideas that have some kind of backbone behind them. To say that gravity is something that works the Earths atmosphere does nothing to explain the rest of the universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now