fractalres 0 Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 Interpolate them. Link to post Share on other sites
mooeypoo 1603 Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 fractalres, you really have to be more clear in your posts. We don't read minds, and we have no idea what you mean. Link to post Share on other sites
fractalres 0 Posted December 4, 2011 Author Share Posted December 4, 2011 I like trig relating data anomalous to its general correspondence. Link to post Share on other sites
Klaynos 740 Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 I still don't know what you mean. Link to post Share on other sites
Phi for All 5887 Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 I still don't know what you mean. There is a great deal of evidence to support the hypothesis that fractalres' posts are designed to engender just this response. Possible conclusions include maintaining a sense of superiority, cognitive disconnection and poor communicative skills. Due to the number of people who have voiced Klaynos' concern above, and the continued vagueness of the ensuing explanations, I would have to say fractalres' threads make him feel smarter the more people respond with a lack of understanding. Have you ever told a devious riddle and then watched as everyone struggled for the answer that you already knew? For some there is a certain glee involved in being cryptic and watching others flounder as you stand on firm ground. Sometimes more so because you're the one who pushed them in. Link to post Share on other sites
John Cuthber 3829 Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 http://xkcd.com/169/ 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now