Jump to content

Cars running on magnets?


dstebbins

Recommended Posts

Lots of scientists are racing to find ways to power cars without expensive fuels.

 

Some people suggesting having a car that runs on hydrogen, and then, funneling the water that was created back into the engine. Unfortunately, due to the law of science that says that no system can ever be 100% efficient, that wouldn't work.

 

However, what if cars ran on magnets? Public roads would be replaced with tracks that are made of north pole magnets. The tracks would look like metal T's protruding out of the ground, which would keep the cars (with north pole magnets on the bottom) from simply being lifted up into the air. Tracks, in this case, would have to go into each person's private garage, but at the same time, there's no more fuel to worry about!

 

The north pole magnets in the bottom of the car would be in the form of hundreds of poles. The poles would stick out diagonally towards the back of the car when you wanted to go forward. When you wanted to put on the breaks, half of the north pole magnets would point diagonally backwards, and half would point diagonally forwards, balancing the magnetic forces out, creating equilibrium and causing the car to remain stationary relative to the ground.

 

There's also some south pole magnets wrapping around the car like a belt, which would repel themselves against other south pole magnets wrapped around other cars, thus preventing a good number of collisions.

 

Turning, accelerating, and parking wouldn't need fuel. The re-adjusting of the north pole magnets and the direction they turn can be done completely using simple machines and muscle power!

 

The biggest problem, that I can see, is convincing entire cities to revamp their road systems.

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turning, accelerating, and parking wouldn't need fuel. The re-adjusting of the north pole magnets and the direction they turn can be done completely using simple machines and muscle power!

 

Aye, there's the rub. All of the work done in the system has to come from turning the magnets. (Also, muscle power is fairly weak/inefficient as things go, which is why we invented machines)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Also, muscle power is fairly weak/inefficient as things go, which is why we invented machines)

 

And power steering!

 

Currently similar technology is being used for mass transit, as I'm sure you are already aware. Maybe some of the quoted figures might be an indication as to why we don't make the sudden leap to maglev passenger vehicles. Tracks are a bit of an inconvenience as well.

 

My opinion on this is we're going to see a slow progression towards the use of mass transit by the greater global population. I'm personally sick and tired of seeing such a high percentage of my surrounding landscape allocated to roads and vehicles. The constant nagging world gloomy doomy is a bit much as well.

 

Assuming there is no move away from passenger vehicles there are a few things that will be addressed as you have attempted to do so. On-board intelligence systems will be coming into fashion over the next decade and has already begun with assisted parking. There is current investigation into charging electric vehicles through magnetic strips embedded in roadways. There are also a few dozen projects investigating maglev for passenger vehicles that doesn't require any sort of track, and so on . . . . I just read a concept of BMW's in where the car is grown from a seed --word-- !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just a concept car, it's called the Biome. How much effort they actually put into realizing something like this is, probably a well guarded secret if they are at all serious. There must be something behind the curtain though if they are actively showcasing the idea as a concept at trade shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should add that what maglev buys you is a reduction in friction, so the work you have to do to move the car is a lot closer to its kinetic energy. But here's another problem with the repulsion as propulsion (of several): hills. You would have to be doing the manual work equivalent to lifting the car up a hill in addition to any kinetic energy you still have. And when you stop, you dissipate all that energy, and there's a question of how quickly you could stop, because friction helps you out there.

 

Even a small car with a mass of ~500 kg (including payload) going ~100 km/hr (60 mph) has a KE of 200,000 Joules. A good workout output for someone in average shape is a kiloWatt. Going "zero to 60" takes more than 3 minutes. Stopping would be similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should add that what maglev buys you is a reduction in friction, so the work you have to do to move the car is a lot closer to its kinetic energy. But here's another problem with the repulsion as propulsion (of several): hills. You would have to be doing the manual work equivalent to lifting the car up a hill in addition to any kinetic energy you still have. And when you stop, you dissipate all that energy, and there's a question of how quickly you could stop, because friction helps you out there.

 

Even a small car with a mass of ~500 kg (including payload) going ~100 km/hr (60 mph) has a KE of 200,000 Joules. A good workout output for someone in average shape is a kiloWatt. Going "zero to 60" takes more than 3 minutes. Stopping would be similar.

Excellent post.

 

I just want to add that we must remember that acceleration and topspeed are a matter of convenience. People might want to make a small sacrifice to make it either cheaper or more ecological.

 

Stopping a vehicle is a matter of safety, and different standards apply. All safety aspects just have to work, or it is not going to work. Ecology and economy always come second to safety. So, if you have a magnetically floating car which cannot safely stop when a child is crossing the road, this concept can go straight into the garbage bin. I am not saying this cannot work... I am only saying that we'd better solve this first before dreaming about a lower energy consumption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just a concept car, it's called the Biome. How much effort they actually put into realizing something like this is, probably a well guarded secret if they are at all serious. There must be something behind the curtain though if they are actively showcasing the idea as a concept at trade shows.

 

Not BMW but Mercedes-Benz.

 

From the link

The Biome isn't built the same way normal cars are. Instead, its bodywork is grown from two seeds -- one for the interior, one for the exterior -- that produce an ultralight 'BioFibre', which is then harvested and knitted together to form the car.

The german engineers discovered cotton.

Or flax (linen). Or bamboo.

Or wood, who knows?

 

--------------------

About the OP, IIRC there is some research into magnetic systems for frictionless binding between the wheel and the axis. It is probable that future electrical vehicles will have the generator in direct contact with the wheel, not to say upon the wheel: 4 wheels, 4 generators, contrasting with existing central power supply. There will be no (or much less) mechanical parts, less gears.

 

found this enterprise

And SKF

Edited by michel123456
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.